Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block vs Surgically-placed Paravertebral Block for VATS Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03768193

Last Updated: 2018-12-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

40 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-04

Study Completion Date

2018-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Thoracic surgery, and surgery involving the chest wall in general, is associated with poorly controlled acute pain, which may result in delayed functional recovery, and may progress to chronic pain. Multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia regimens are a key component of the thoracic surgery enhanced recovery pathway, the aim of which is to improve outcomes in patients undergoing both minimally invasive and open thoracic surgical procedures. Novel interfascial plane blocks are emerging as feasible alternatives to central neuraxial analgesia techniques in a variety of clinical settings.

The aim of this study is to show non-inferiority of serratus anterior blockade compared with surgically placed paravertebral blocks in the management of perioperative acute pain in patients undergoing VATS procedures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Post-thoracotomy pain syndrome is an unwanted complication of thoracic surgery. Poorly controlled pain may precipitate increased morbidity in the immediate and early postoperative periods due to its adverse effects on respiratory mechanics and mobilisation, which may result in further morbidity such as postoperative pulmonary complications and thrombosis. Poor perioperative management of this pain may also result in the development of chronic pain. Enhanced recovery, particularly functional recovery has become an important goal in the perioperative management of our patients. A key principle of this pathway is multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia to facilitate improved recovery and patient outcomes. Regional anaesthesia forms the cornerstone of this multimodal analgesia regimen.

Traditionally, thoracic epidural and thoracic paravertebral blockade have been the main forms of regional anaesthesia utilised in thoracic surgical patients undergoing lung resection. With the increasing use of minimally invasive thoracic surgery and with a cohort of patients who may not always be suitable for central neuraxial blockade, alternatives are needed. More recently, there has been an emerging use of interfascial plane blocks in this patient group. The interest in these techniques is derived from case reports, case series, cadaveric studies, and small clinical trials, which have demonstrated clinical efficacy in a variety of elective and emergency thoracic surgical procedures and also in chronic thoracic pain syndromes.

The deep serratus anterior plane (deep SAP) block is a relatively new interfascial plane regional anaesthesia technique, which has been postulated to provide analgesia of the entire hemithorax. The mechanism of its analgesic effects are believed to occur via blockade of the lateral cutaneous branches of the thoracic intercostal nerves (T2-T12), which produces analgesia of the anterolateral chest wall. A recent anatomical study by Mayes et al. demonstrated consistent blockade of the lateral cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves. Clinical studies, although small, have shown dermatomal spread in the T2 - T9 distribution of the anterolateral chest wall. Therefore, this block presents a potential alternative to central neuraxial blockade.

However, whether SAP blockade can produce non-inferior analgesia compared with either thoracic epidural or thoracic paravertebral, both in terms of somatic +/- autonomic blockade, and the reliability of dermatomal spread, has been questioned by some.

The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to demonstrate non-inferiority of ultrasound-guided continuous deep serratus anterior plane blockade compared with surgically-placed continuous paravertebral blockade, for perioperative analgesia, in the patients undergoing minimally-invasive videoscopic thoracic surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Thoracic Diseases Thoracic Surgery Rib Fractures Pain, Postoperative Pain, Procedural Anaesthesia, Regional

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Deep serratus anterior plane block

Ultrasound-guided deposition of 40mls of 2mg/ kg levobupivacaine into the deep serratus anterior plane space, in the mid axillary line, at the level of the 4th/5th rib. Insertion of a continuous local anaesthetic infusion catheter(Portex™) and continuation of an infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine at a rate of 8-12mls/ hour for 48 hours.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Deep serratus anterior plane block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Deposition of local anaesthetic in the space between the serratus anterior muscle and the external intercostal muscle, at the level of the 4th-5th rib, in the midaxillary line. Procedure performed under ultrasound guidance. Catheter - based infusion of local anaesthetic into this space for 48 hours.

Surgically-placed paravertebral block

Surgical placement of paravertebral local anaesthetic infusion catheters (Portex™) prior to closure. Bolus of levobupivacaine as per protocol. Continuation of an infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine at a rate of 8-12mls/ hour for 48 hours.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Surgically-placed paravertebral block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgically-placed paravertebral block catheters for continuous local anaesthetic infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine at 8-12mls/ hr for 48 hours.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Deep serratus anterior plane block

Deposition of local anaesthetic in the space between the serratus anterior muscle and the external intercostal muscle, at the level of the 4th-5th rib, in the midaxillary line. Procedure performed under ultrasound guidance. Catheter - based infusion of local anaesthetic into this space for 48 hours.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgically-placed paravertebral block

Surgically-placed paravertebral block catheters for continuous local anaesthetic infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine at 8-12mls/ hr for 48 hours.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

• All adults greater than or equal to 18 years of age presenting for minimally-invasive thoracic surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal.
* Local infection at site of insertion.
* Allergy to amide local anaesthetics, opioids, paracetamol, NSAIDs, ketamine, NMBs, volatile anaesthetics.
* Concurrent use of antiarrhythmics with local anaesthetic activity.
* Concurrent use of MAOIs or within 2 weeks of MAOI use.
* Severe renal, liver or cardiac dysfunction.
* Coagulopathy/ anticoagulants that preclude use of PVB/ SAP techniques.
* Inability to comprehend pain scoring system.
* Elderly or frail patients that require a reduction in levobupivacaine dose commensurate with their physical status, resulting in the protocol not being followed.
* Pregnancy, breastfeeding.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mater Misericordiae University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Conor Hearty

Consultant Anaesthetist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Conor Hearty, FFPMCAI,FFPMANZCA,FCARCSI,FIPP

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Consultant Anaesthetist, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mater Misericordiae University Hospital

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Ireland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hanley C, Wall T, Bukowska I, Redmond K, Eaton D, Ni Mhuircheartaigh R, Hearty C. Ultrasound-guided continuous deep serratus anterior plane block versus continuous thoracic paravertebral block for perioperative analgesia in videoscopic-assisted thoracic surgery. Eur J Pain. 2020 Apr;24(4):828-838. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1533. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31955478 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1/378/1918

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id