Effecot of Serratus Posterior Superior Intercostal Plane Block and Thoracic Paravertebral Block in VATS
NCT ID: NCT06219369
Last Updated: 2025-01-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-31
2024-08-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Among these methods, TPVB performed under ultrasound guidance is already a commonly preferred and classical method. In patients undergoing thoracotomy and VATS, Tulgar and colleagues have defined SPSIPB as a new technique and demonstrated its efficacy in providing analgesia in the hemithorax when considering the sensory dermatome of SPSIPB in a cadaveric and a case series study with five patients conducted in 2023. Similarly, Avcı and colleagues, in their article published in 2023, emphasized the analgesic effectiveness of SPSIPB in the thoracic region after VATS. As far as we know, there is no published study comparing TPVB and SPSIPB under ultrasound guidance to date. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare ultrasound-guided TPVB and SPSIPB in postoperative analgesia after VATS. Our primary goal is to investigate whether there are any superiority in terms of postoperative Visual analog score (VAS), time to first rescue analgesia, opioid consumption, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) score, and complications, and to determine which one is more effective.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Superficial+Deep Vs. Deep Serratus Anterior Plan Block in Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery
NCT05852561
Comparison of Combined Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Thoracic Paravertebral Block
NCT05255562
US-Guided SAPB Versus ESPB on Acute and Chronic Pain After VATS
NCT05160961
Comparison of Deep Serratus Anterior Plane Block and Superficial Serratus Anterior Plane Block
NCT05105282
Effect of Different Local Anesthetic Volumes of Serratus Anterior Plan Block After Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
NCT05255536
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Materials and Methods:
This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind observational trial. A minimum of 70 patients, aged between 18 and 65, with a body mass index (BMI) \<35, undergoing VATS surgery at the Chest Surgery Service of Hitit University Faculty of Medicine Erol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, and classified under the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification 1-2-3, who have read and accepted the voluntary informed consent form, will be included. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups using a computer-based method. The study will be blinded for patients, surgeons, and those monitoring postoperative pain. Group T (n=35) will consist of patients receiving TPVB, and Group S (n=35) will include patients receiving SPSIPB.
Exclusion criteria:
Patients unwilling to participate in the study, those with BMI \>35, ASA 4-5 classification, inability to score pain using the Visual analog score (VAS) system, allergies to the local anesthetic and specified analgesic drugs, pregnant or breastfeeding women, patients under 18 or over 65 years old, those with uncontrolled anxiety, alcohol or drug dependence, neuromuscular or peripheral nerve diseases, high-dose opioid use 3 days before surgery, widespread chronic pain, diabetes mellitus, hepatic and renal insufficiency, coagulation disorders, and patients using anticoagulant drugs, as well as those with infections at the site of peripheral block needle entry, a history of abdominal surgery or trauma, inability to communicate in Turkish, technical problems while using patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) during surgery, and patients for whom surgery needs to be terminated before completion and those for whom postoperative extubation is not planned will be excluded from the study.
Method:
Patients will be provided with the necessary information about the procedure, and written consent will be obtained. Included patients will be randomly assigned to either Group T or Group S according to a computerized randomization table created by a non-participating researcher. Each patient will be assigned a random code for blinding, sealed in envelopes. The anesthetist in the operating room will receive the relevant sealed envelope indicating the block to be performed for each randomized patient. Patients, surgeons, and those monitoring postoperative pain will be blinded to the patient\'s group information. Patients will be taken to the operating room, where standard anesthesia monitoring will be applied. (non-invasive arterial blood pressure measurement, heart rate, electrocardiography, peripheral oxygen saturation measurement). A 20 G catheter will be placed for intravenous access in the patient. The time of anesthesia initiation will be recorded. For premedication, 0.03 mg/kg midazolam will be administered to the patients, and after preoxygenation, anesthesia induction will be performed with 2 mg/kg propofol and 1 mcg/kg fentanyl. After the administration of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium bromide IV and achieving muscle relaxation, intubation will be performed with a double-lumen endotracheal tube. Mechanical ventilation will be provided with pressure-controlled mode targeting an end-tidal CO2 value of 35-40 mmHg. During anesthesia maintenance, O2/air mixture (FiO2: 0.40), sevoflurane (minimum alveolar concentration 0.8-1), and IV remifentanil infusion will be used. Remifentanil infusion will be planned to maintain the patient\'s mean arterial blood pressure within 20% of the baseline value. The patient\'s intraoperative vital signs will be monitored as per routine anesthesia protocol. As an intraoperative antiemetic, 4 mg ondansetron IV will be administered. Thirty minutes before the end of the surgical procedure, 1 g of paracetamol infusion and 1 mg/kg contramal IV infusion will be administered to all patients for analgesic purposes. After the completion of the surgery, while maintaining the depth of anesthesia, the regional anesthesia technique will be applied. All block procedures will be performed under sterile conditions. The end time of the surgical procedure, the end time of anesthesia, the time of block administration, and the time of anesthesia termination will be recorded.
SPSIPB Technique:
The SPSIPB block, which follows the guidelines we routinely use, will be performed after the completion of the surgical procedure and before the patient wakes up. A high-frequency linear US probe (11-12 MHz, Vivid Q) will be covered with a sterile sheath, and an 80 mm block needle (Braun 360°) will be used. The procedure will be performed with the patient in a lateral decubitus position. After gently shifting the scapula laterally, the US probe will be held sagittally at the upper corner of the scapula spine, visualizing the 3rd rib and the serratus posterior superior muscle. An in-plane technique will be used. The block needle will be advanced cranio-caudally between the serratus posterior superior and the 3rd rib. Block placement will be confirmed by injecting 5 ml of saline between the rib and muscle. After confirming the block placement, 30 ml of 0.25% concentration marcain (bupivacaine) will be used.
TPVB Technique:
The US probe (11-12 MHz, Vivid Q) will be placed 2-3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process. After visualizing the transverse process, the paravertebral area, internal intercostal membrane, paravertebral space, and pleura, the needle will be advanced to the paravertebral space using an in-plane technique. Hydrodissection with 5 ml of saline and pleural depression will be performed in this area. After confirming the accuracy of the site, 30 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected into this area.
After completing the designated block procedure, neuromuscular blockade will be reversed with 4 mg/kg sugammadex under 80% O2 ventilation. After confirming spontaneous eye opening, the endotracheal tube will be removed, and patients will be transferred to the intensive care unit for observation and close monitoring. Postoperative pain monitoring, blinded to the patient\'s group information, will be performed by an
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
The SPSIPB block, which follows the guidelines we routinely use, will be performed after the completion of the surgical procedure and before the patient wakes up.
TPVB Technique:
The US probe (11-12 MHz, Vivid Q) will be placed 2-3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process. After visualizing the transverse process, the paravertebral area, internal intercostal membrane, paravertebral space, and pleura, the needle will be advanced to the paravertebral space using an in-plane technique.
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group T
Group T patients who underwent TPVB
Group T
SPSIPB Technique:
The SPSIPB block, which follows the guidelines we routinely use, will be performed after the completion of the surgical procedure and before the patient wakes up.
TPVB Technique:
The US probe (11-12 MHz, Vivid Q) will be placed 2-3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process. After visualizing the transverse process, the paravertebral area, internal intercostal membrane, paravertebral space, and pleura, the needle will be advanced to the paravertebral space using an in-plane technique.
Group S
Group S patients who underwent SPSIPB
Group T
SPSIPB Technique:
The SPSIPB block, which follows the guidelines we routinely use, will be performed after the completion of the surgical procedure and before the patient wakes up.
TPVB Technique:
The US probe (11-12 MHz, Vivid Q) will be placed 2-3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process. After visualizing the transverse process, the paravertebral area, internal intercostal membrane, paravertebral space, and pleura, the needle will be advanced to the paravertebral space using an in-plane technique.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Group T
SPSIPB Technique:
The SPSIPB block, which follows the guidelines we routinely use, will be performed after the completion of the surgical procedure and before the patient wakes up.
TPVB Technique:
The US probe (11-12 MHz, Vivid Q) will be placed 2-3 cm lateral to the T5 spinous process. After visualizing the transverse process, the paravertebral area, internal intercostal membrane, paravertebral space, and pleura, the needle will be advanced to the paravertebral space using an in-plane technique.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical classification 1-2-3,
* Aged between 18-65,
* Who have read and accepted the voluntary informed consent form,
* Body mass index (BMI) of \<35.
Exclusion Criteria
* BMI \>35,
* ASA physical classifications 4-5,
* Patients unable to perform pain scoring using the NRS system,
* Those allergic to the administered local anesthetic and designated analgesic medication, individuals declaring pregnancy or lactation,
* Patients under 18 or over 65 years of age,
* Uncontrollable anxiety,
* Alcohol and drug addiction,
* Neuromuscular and peripheral nerve diseases,
* Using high doses of opioid medication three days before surgery,
* Widespread chronic pain,
* Diabetes mellitus,
* Hepatic and renal insufficiency,
* Coagulation disorders,
* Using anticoagulant drugs,
* Infection at the site of peripheral block needle insertion,
* History of abdominal surgery or trauma,
* Unable to communicate in Turkish,
* Patients experiencing technical problems while using patient-controlled analgesia,
* Patients for whom the surgical procedure needs to be terminated for any reason before completion, as well as those for whom postoperative extubation is not planned, will not be accepted into the study.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ankara Ataturk Sanatorium Training and Research Hospital
OTHER_GOV
Hitit University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Güvenç Doğan
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guvenc Dogan, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hitit Universirty
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hitit university
Çorum, Çorum, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Hitit
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.