The Effect of Patient Advocacy Training on Advocacy Skills, Ethical Sensitivity, and Patient Safety Culture in Nurses
NCT ID: NCT06969482
Last Updated: 2025-05-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
70 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-06-21
2025-09-19
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Social Justice Advocacy Skills and Ethical Sensitivity
NCT04578821
Child Abuse Training Impact on Nurses
NCT07050420
Peer Education Impact on Student Nurse Patient Safety
NCT06257173
The Effect of Repeated Simulation in Developing Social Justice Advocacy Attitudes and Skills on Nursing Student
NCT05966181
Program Development Study for Developing Ethical Decision Making and Ethical Sensitivity in Nursing Students
NCT06176326
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
The tools used for evaluation are as follows:
* Personal Information Form
* Patient Advocacy Scale for Nurses
* Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire
* Patient Safety Culture Hospital Questionnaire
These tools will be administered and evaluated by a specialist nurse in both groups.
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The Effect of Patient Advocacy Training on Advocacy Skills, Ethical Sensitivity and Patient Safety C
In this application, measurements are made before the experiment/intervention (pre-test).
No interventions assigned to this group
Pre-testing was applied to all individuals participating in the study.
Post-training measurements of the experimental group and pre-test and post-test comparison analyses of the two groups.
measuring knowledge level
The study group consists of 70 nurses, each consisting of 35 people. After the routine training of the hospital was given to the control and experimental groups, their consents were obtained and the pre-tests were completed, they were divided into experimental and control groups using simple randomization. The first group of nurses in the control group will not receive any intervention other than the routine training given by the hospital.
educational intervention
the effectiveness of training by making measurements after training and comparing them with pre-training results
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
measuring knowledge level
The study group consists of 70 nurses, each consisting of 35 people. After the routine training of the hospital was given to the control and experimental groups, their consents were obtained and the pre-tests were completed, they were divided into experimental and control groups using simple randomization. The first group of nurses in the control group will not receive any intervention other than the routine training given by the hospital.
educational intervention
the effectiveness of training by making measurements after training and comparing them with pre-training results
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Selcuk University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Neslihan Şahin
Doctoral Student
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Neslihan Ş Doctoral student, Doctoral student
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Selcuk University
Neslihan Ş ŞAHİN, Doctoral student
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Selcuk University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Neslihan Ş Doctoral student, Doctoral student
Role: CONTACT
Emel F Doç.Dr.Emel Filiz, Associate Professor
Role: CONTACT
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
203172001002
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.