Communication Skills and Anger Management Training for Nurses
NCT ID: NCT06827067
Last Updated: 2025-02-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
56 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-03-01
2018-02-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Method: The study was conducted using a convergent parallel design, which is a mixed-method design. The experimental and control groups of the study were conducted with a total of 56 nurses. Data were collected using a socio-demographic data collection form, Communication Skills Inventory and State-Trait Anger and Anger Expression Scale. The intervention group participated in the simulation, and qualitative data were collected during the debriefing session of the simulation. The scales were administered to the groups 3 times in total: before the training, after the training and 6 weeks after the end of the training.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cognitive-Behavioral Approach and Anger
NCT06716684
Simulations Impact on Nursing Students Conflict Resolution and Problem-Solving Skills
NCT06592729
The Effect of Simulation Method on Self-Confidence and Stress Levels in Nursing Students
NCT06454786
Evaluation of the Efficiency of a Training Program Developed For Newly Graduate Nurses
NCT06711484
Ethical Attitude and Humanistic Acting Skills of Intensive Care Nurses
NCT06260592
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
"Difficult patients" are defined in the literature as patients with behaviors that hinder communication. (Göral 2011, Koekkoek et al. 2006). In a study conducted by Essary et al. (2005), it was observed that patients were labeled as "difficult patients" as a result of ineffective communication between nurse and patient and that nurses tended to blame patients as a result of labeling. In the literature, it is stated that improving communication skills with the difficult patient group will benefit nurses and the onset of conflicts can be prevented, which should not be forgotten that conflicts that cannot be prevented arouse feelings of anger in individuals. (MacLean at all 2017, Baran and Okanlı 2015) For this reason, it is as important for nurses to improve their communication skills as it is for them to improve their ability to cope with anger.
Although anger is a frequently felt emotion in the nursing profession, this emotion should not be expressed with aggression or suppressed in order to be healthy and useful. Nurses should gain the ability to express anger in a healthy way by recognizing and accepting it like all other emotions (Bozkurt 2010, Akdeniz 2007). Expressing anger openly in an acceptable way is a positive personality trait. However, such emotions that cannot be controlled and are ignored by denial or suppression have the potential to be harmful for both the person and his/her environment (Kaya et al. 2012). In the study conducted by Baran and Okanlı in 2015, it was emphasized that nurses should regularly receive in-service trainings on anger and anger expression in order to recognize their anger, accept its existence and express their anger correctly. Trainings on anger management can be given in many ways like other trainings. These ways can be in the form of individual and group trainings as well as using various simulations.
Simulation-based trainings are ideal for nursing education as they include an interactive method that can be used to teach cognitive, psychomotor or emotional skills to individuals or groups at any skill or proficiency level. ( Zengin \& Eren Fidancı 2024, Tanis, Quinn, \& Bischoff, 2019) In standardized patient simulation, the patient or case study is animated by playing the scenario prepared with structured steps. The use of standardized patients in teaching contributes to the development of participants' communication skills, history taking and physical examination skills. ( Zengin \& Eren Fidancı 2024). When the literature is examined, it is seen that skill-oriented studies are frequently used in simulation-based studies, but emotion-oriented studies are weaker, and the majority of the studies are conducted with student nurses, and the intervention study conducted with working nurses is very limited.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Control group
Theoretical training consisting of a total of 7 sessions of 40-45 minutes each was given to 30 nurses in the control group.
Theoretical training
The trainings, each of which lasted 40-45 minutes on average, were conducted in a total of 7 sessions.
Experimental group
Immediately after the theoretical trainings of 30 nurses in the experimental group were completed, simulation trainings conducted with a standard patient were given. A half-day training was given to the standard patient (SH) about the scenario content before the application. Before the encounter with the SH, a preliminary interview was held with the nurses in the briefing room, where the content and purpose of the application were explained to the nurses, and the story of the SH was told to the nurses in line with the prepared scenario. Three nurses were interviewed for each scenario. The nurses communicated with the SH for 10-15 minutes and each interview was conducted using video recordings. Those who finished the interview with the SH watched the scenario of the other group as observers and at the end of each 3 scenarios, the debriefing phase lasting an average of 60-90 minutes was carried out.
Simulation application with standard patient
Before the encounter with the standard patient (SH), a preliminary interview was held with the nurses in the briefing room, where the content and purpose of the application were explained to the nurses, and the story of the SH was told to the nurses in line with the prepared scenario. Three nurses were interviewed for each scenario. The nurses communicated with the SH for 10-15 minutes and each interview was conducted using video recordings. Those who finished the interview with the SH watched the scenario of the other group as observers, and at the end of each 3 scenarios, the debriefing phase was carried out for an average of 60-90 minutes.
Theoretical training
The trainings, each of which lasted 40-45 minutes on average, were conducted in a total of 7 sessions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Simulation application with standard patient
Before the encounter with the standard patient (SH), a preliminary interview was held with the nurses in the briefing room, where the content and purpose of the application were explained to the nurses, and the story of the SH was told to the nurses in line with the prepared scenario. Three nurses were interviewed for each scenario. The nurses communicated with the SH for 10-15 minutes and each interview was conducted using video recordings. Those who finished the interview with the SH watched the scenario of the other group as observers, and at the end of each 3 scenarios, the debriefing phase was carried out for an average of 60-90 minutes.
Theoretical training
The trainings, each of which lasted 40-45 minutes on average, were conducted in a total of 7 sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Working as a nurse in any of the surgical or internal medicine clinics of the hospital
* According to the results of the pre-test application, anger control scores were lower than the other nurses participating in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
* Not having participated in simulation training in the experimental group
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Yuksek Ihtisas University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Arzu AYDOĞAN
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Arzu AYDOĞAN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Yuksek Ihtisas University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yuksek Ihtisas University
Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Dated 11/9/2016 and no. 15/10
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.