The Effect of "Standardized and Real Patient Interviews" on Students' Self-Confidence and Self-Efficacy Levels in Nursing Process Education
NCT ID: NCT07098442
Last Updated: 2025-08-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
83 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-15
2022-01-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Effect of Peer Mentoring Model Supported by Mobile Application
NCT06792032
Peer Mentoring in Midwifery Students: Its Impact on University Adjustment, Leadership, and Professional Perception
NCT07083141
The Effect of the Reflective Practices
NCT07103538
ARCS-Based Training to Improve Nursing Students' Communication, Motivation, and Self-Efficacy
NCT07004205
The Effect of Repeated Standardized Patient Use on Students' Anxiety and Learning Levels in Teaching Extremity Examination Skills
NCT06712953
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Online Standart Patient
Online Interview Group
Before the Interview
* Preliminary briefings were given by providing a scenario for the standard patient to be interviewed.
* Students were given the "Interview Guide," "Nursing Process Case Example," and "Tips for Conducting a Successful Interview" documents and were asked to read them before the interview.
Interview
• Students conducted a 30-45 minute interview with a pre-determined standard patient.
After the Interview
* The instructor, who monitored the interview, debriefed the students.
* On the first clinical day after the intervention, students conducted a 30-45 minute interview with the patient they were responsible for, which included the instructor.
Clinical Real Patient
Clinical Real Patient Group
Before the Interview
* Patients who were willing to be interviewed in the clinic, stable, and physically and psychologically competent were selected, and the faculty member who would monitor the interview provided preliminary information about the interview.
* Students were provided with the "Interview Guide," "Nursing Process Case Example," and "Tips for Conducting a Successful Interview" documents and were asked to read them before the interview.
Interview
• Students conducted a 30-45 minute interview with a real patient in the pre-determined clinic.
After the Interview
* The faculty member who monitored the interview debriefed the students.
* On the first clinical day after the intervention, students had a 30-45 minute interview with the patient for whom they were responsible, which included the faculty member.
Control Group
Control Group
On the first clinical day, students had a 30-45 minute meeting with the patient they were responsible for, which included the instructor.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Control Group
On the first clinical day, students had a 30-45 minute meeting with the patient they were responsible for, which included the instructor.
Online Interview Group
Before the Interview
* Preliminary briefings were given by providing a scenario for the standard patient to be interviewed.
* Students were given the "Interview Guide," "Nursing Process Case Example," and "Tips for Conducting a Successful Interview" documents and were asked to read them before the interview.
Interview
• Students conducted a 30-45 minute interview with a pre-determined standard patient.
After the Interview
* The instructor, who monitored the interview, debriefed the students.
* On the first clinical day after the intervention, students conducted a 30-45 minute interview with the patient they were responsible for, which included the instructor.
Clinical Real Patient Group
Before the Interview
* Patients who were willing to be interviewed in the clinic, stable, and physically and psychologically competent were selected, and the faculty member who would monitor the interview provided preliminary information about the interview.
* Students were provided with the "Interview Guide," "Nursing Process Case Example," and "Tips for Conducting a Successful Interview" documents and were asked to read them before the interview.
Interview
• Students conducted a 30-45 minute interview with a real patient in the pre-determined clinic.
After the Interview
* The faculty member who monitored the interview debriefed the students.
* On the first clinical day after the intervention, students had a 30-45 minute interview with the patient for whom they were responsible, which included the faculty member.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Taking the Fundamentals of Nursing course for the first time,
* Attending the theoretical explanation of the Nursing Process within the Fundamentals of Nursing course and the history-taking skills demonstration given by the instructor.
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Akdeniz University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hilal Gamze Hakbilen
Res. Assist. Dr.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Nursing Faculty
Antalya, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wilson RD, Klein JD, Hagler D. Computer-based or human patient simulation-based case analysis: which works better for teaching diagnostic reasoning skills? Nurs Educ Perspect. 2014 Jan-Feb;35(1):14-8. doi: 10.5480/11-515.1.
Olaussen C, Heggdal K, Tvedt CR. Elements in scenario-based simulation associated with nursing students' self-confidence and satisfaction: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Open. 2019 Sep 27;7(1):170-179. doi: 10.1002/nop2.375. eCollection 2020 Jan.
Labrague LJ, McEnroe-Petitte DM, Bowling AM, Nwafor CE, Tsaras K. High-fidelity simulation and nursing students' anxiety and self-confidence: A systematic review. Nurs Forum. 2019 Jul;54(3):358-368. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12337. Epub 2019 Mar 10.
Ozdemir NG, Kaya H. The effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation methods to gain Foley catheterization knowledge, skills, satisfaction and self-confidence among novice nursing students: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Nov;130:105952. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105952. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
Sarmasoglu S, Dinc L, Elcin M. Using Standardized Patients in Nursing Education: Effects on Students' Psychomotor Skill Development. Nurse Educ. 2016 Mar-Apr;41(2):E1-5. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0000000000000188.
Ordu Y, Caliskan N. The impact of a web-based mind map learning technique on students' nursing knowledge of the nursing process. Int J Nurs Knowl. 2023 Apr;34(2):108-115. doi: 10.1111/2047-3095.12374. Epub 2022 May 20.
Johnson KV, Scott AL, Franks L. Impact of Standardized Patients on First Semester Nursing Students Self-Confidence, Satisfaction, and Communication in a Simulated Clinical Case. SAGE Open Nurs. 2020 Jun 10;6:2377960820930153. doi: 10.1177/2377960820930153. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Akın, A. (2016). Development and Psychometric Properties of Self-Confidence Scale. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education, 7(2).
Yıldırım, F., \& İlhan, İ. Ö. (2010). Validity and reliability study of the Turkish form of the general self-efficacy scale. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 21(4), 301-308.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AkdUni
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.