Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
77 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-19
2024-06-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Hypothesis H1-1: Reflective practices affect nursing students' empathy level. H1-2: Reflective practices affect nursing students' compassion level.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Affective Learning in Disabled Health Training
NCT04365894
The Effect of "Standardized and Real Patient Interviews" on Students' Self-Confidence and Self-Efficacy Levels in Nursing Process Education
NCT07098442
The Effect of Compassionate Care Education on Nurses
NCT06921369
Drama-supported Patient Role Experience of Nursing Students
NCT05117944
The Effect of multımedıa-based educatıon ın dıstance learnıng on nursıng Students'
NCT05678855
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
The intervention was implemented as part of a nursing course consisting of 4 hours of theoretical instruction, 4 hours of laboratory practice, and 8 hours of clinical practice. For 14 weeks, reflective practice was integrated into both the laboratory and clinical components. In the laboratory sessions, clinical scenarios were developed based on five common topics (e.g., infection control, vital signs) that students are likely to encounter during clinical practice. Students performed these scenarios by taking on different roles. Following each role-play, structured reflection sessions were conducted with the students. In the clinical setting, the final hour of each practice day was allocated for reflection. After completing an online reflection form, students had the opportunity to engage in group discussions if they wished to reflect further.
Reflective practices
The intervention was implemented as part of a nursing course consisting of 4 hours of theoretical instruction, 4 hours of laboratory practice, and 8 hours of clinical practice. For 14 weeks, reflective practice was integrated into both the laboratory and clinical components. In the laboratory sessions, clinical scenarios were developed based on five common topics (e.g., infection control, vital signs) that students are likely to encounter during clinical practice. Students performed these scenarios by taking on different roles. Following each role-play, structured reflection sessions were conducted with the students. In the clinical setting, the final hour of each practice day was allocated for reflection. After completing an online reflection form, students had the opportunity to engage in group discussions if they wished to reflect further.
Control
Students followed the same laboratory and clinical curriculum but did not participate in any structured reflective practices. They received standard instruction in psychomotor skills and routine clinical procedures without the inclusion of role-play, scenario-based learning, or debriefing sessions.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Reflective practices
The intervention was implemented as part of a nursing course consisting of 4 hours of theoretical instruction, 4 hours of laboratory practice, and 8 hours of clinical practice. For 14 weeks, reflective practice was integrated into both the laboratory and clinical components. In the laboratory sessions, clinical scenarios were developed based on five common topics (e.g., infection control, vital signs) that students are likely to encounter during clinical practice. Students performed these scenarios by taking on different roles. Following each role-play, structured reflection sessions were conducted with the students. In the clinical setting, the final hour of each practice day was allocated for reflection. After completing an online reflection form, students had the opportunity to engage in group discussions if they wished to reflect further.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Enrollment in the "Fundamentals of Nursing-II" course
* Taking the course for the first time
* Not having previously received training in reflective practice
* Being registered in Class B
Exclusion Criteria
* Failure to fully complete the data collection forms
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Akdeniz University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fatma DURSUN ERGEZEN
Assistant Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Akdeniz University
Antalya, Antalya, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Durkin M, Gurbutt R, Carson J. Effectiveness of an online short compassion strengths course on nursing students compassion: A mixed methods non-randomised pilot study. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Apr;111:105315. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105315. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
Dreifuerst KT. Using debriefing for meaningful learning to foster development of clinical reasoning in simulation. J Nurs Educ. 2012 Jun;51(6):326-33. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20120409-02. Epub 2012 Apr 9.
Contreras JA, Edwards-Maddox S, Hall A, Lee MA. Effects of Reflective Practice on Baccalaureate Nursing Students' Stress, Anxiety and Competency: An Integrative Review. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Jun;17(3):239-245. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12438. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
Coleman D, Willis DS. Reflective writing: the student nurse's perspective on reflective writing and poetry writing. Nurse Educ Today. 2015 Jul;35(7):906-11. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
Arman M. Empathy, sympathy, and altruism-An evident triad based on compassion. A theoretical model for caring. Scand J Caring Sci. 2023 Sep;37(3):862-871. doi: 10.1111/scs.13163. Epub 2023 Mar 21.
Adamson E, Dewar B. Compassionate Care: Student nurses' learning through reflection and the use of story. Nurse Educ Pract. 2015 May;15(3):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2014.08.002. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FErgezen
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.