Stress and Learning in Educator- vs. Software-Guided VR Training for Basic Life Support

NCT ID: NCT06968260

Last Updated: 2025-05-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

66 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-05-31

Study Completion Date

2025-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized controlled trial will explore how instructor type-human vs. machine-affects performance, immersion, and stress during VR-based Basic Life Support (BLS) training. Participants will receive VR based education wither with a machine instructor or a human instructor and complete a simulated emergency exam. Outcomes will include procedural accuracy, physiological stress (measured via electrodermal activity), and subjective evaluations of presence and instructor effectiveness.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In high-stakes medical emergencies, both technical proficiency and psychological resilience are critical. Traditional Basic Life Support (BLS) training methods-such as lectures, role-play, and manikin-based practice-help students build core skills but often fall short in replicating the stress and complexity of real-world crises. As medical education evolves, virtual reality (VR) is emerging as a promising tool, offering immersive, controlled environments that simulate emergency conditions while supporting both skill acquisition and psychological engagement. However, while VR's benefits for technical training are well-established, its impact on stress management and mental preparedness remains underexplored.

This study will examine how the type of instructor-human or machine-within a VR-based training environment influences students' performance, immersion, and stress responses during BLS training. Participants will undergo VR-based BLS instruction led by either a human educator or a software-based guide, followed by a simulated emergency exam. Outcomes will be assessed through procedural accuracy, physiological stress measured via electrodermal activity (EDA), and subjective evaluations of presence and instructor effectiveness.

The findings are expected to shed light on how different instructional approaches in VR affect not only learning outcomes but also students' capacity to manage stress in high-pressure situations. By identifying how instructor type influences both competence and psychological resilience, this research aims to optimize VR-based medical training for the demands of real-world clinical practice.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Machine Guidance Instructor Guidance

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Machine Guidance

The participants will receive a machine guided education

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Education Type

Intervention Type OTHER

Machine Guidance group will receive education from a software, while the Instructor Guidance Group will receive education from a human instructor.

Instructor Guidance

Participants will receive human guided education

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Education Type

Intervention Type OTHER

Machine Guidance group will receive education from a software, while the Instructor Guidance Group will receive education from a human instructor.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Education Type

Machine Guidance group will receive education from a software, while the Instructor Guidance Group will receive education from a human instructor.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Being older than 18

Exclusion Criteria

* prior completion of Basic Life Support (BLS) training
* history of virtual reality (VR)-induced motion sickness
* medical conditions such as vertigo or the use of medications known to cause vertigo-like symptoms
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Acibadem University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-17/647

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Virtual Reality Use for ICU Mobility
NCT07234201 RECRUITING NA