Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-07-02
2022-07-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
ARCS-Based Training to Improve Nursing Students' Communication, Motivation, and Self-Efficacy
NCT07004205
Impact of Vaccine Education Program on Vaccine Advocacy and Vaccine Literacy
NCT05929053
Training of Trainers Program in IPE for Health Professionals
NCT06634433
Determining the Effects of an Evidence-Based Practice Education Intervention Program Applied to Nursing Students
NCT06195397
The Effect of a Mixed Intervention Structured According to the Integrated Disaster Management System
NCT07302529
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For this program, an announcement was made through the faculties which provide healthcare education and volunteering students from the Faculties of Dentistry, Medicine and Health Sciences (Nutrition and Dietetics, Nursing, Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation) were included in the education program. A whatsapp group of volunteer students was created and used for communication and motivational strategies. The link was sent to the students ahead of time via e-mail and the whatsapp group. The tactics and strategies required by the ARCS-V Motivation Model were used throughout the whole process.
• First session: In this session, which was online and lasted for 120 minutes, the education program was introduced to the students and conceptual information was presented. Links to the sociodemographic data form and the RIPLS were shared with the students and they were asked to fill them out prior to face to-face training.
The second and third sessions were face-to-face and were comprised of two 8-hour work days. Facilitators and students participated in these sessions.
• Second session: Introductions and warm-up exercises were carried out. In the development phase of the ADDIE instructional design, four scenarios addressing "Chronic Disease Management and Patient Safety" which involved different health professionals were prepared. The participants were segmented into four study groups, each delineated by their respective professional domains.The formation of these groups was intentionally designed to include a proportional mix of professional fields relevant to each specific scenario. For example, the makeup of one scenario group included 2 medical students, 2 nursing students, 1 physiotherapy student, and 2 dentistry students. In a parallel manner, a different scenario group was arranged with 2 students from medicine, 2 from nursing, 1 from dentistry, and 2 focusing on nutrition and dietetics. This strategic grouping fostered a diverse yet balanced professional composition in each group, directly aligning with the scenario-driven learning objectives.
Two facilitators and one observer were appointed to each group. The task of the facilitators was to ensure that the scenario was read by the students and the discussion was guided by discussion questions.
Observers watched the students and facilitators and took notes on the process of conducting the guided discussion as part of the interprofessional education program.
The whole discussion process was audio- and video-recorded with the voluntary consent of the students and facilitators.
At the end of the day;
* Each group was asked to make a presentation of their achievements according to the interprofessional education competencies (roles and responsibilities, communication skills, collaborative leadership, teamwork, ethics, approach to patient needs and lifelong learning) in the scenarios they discussed.
* Each student was scored by the facilitators using the IPE evaluation form.
* Each student was given questions prepared for reflection based on the scenario they discussed and asked to submit them to the facilitators as homework within a few hours.
* In preparation for the next day, all facilitators were provided with the discussion session recordings and students' reflection assignments and were asked to prepare feedback.
* Third Session: This session was planned in a large group format including students, facilitators, and observers.
The session started with a warm-up chat. A presentation on the outcomes of the discussion were made by the student who had the role of spokesperson in each group.
The facilitators showed the discussion video segments to the whole group and gave feedback by sharing the positive ideas and the ideas that needed to be improved. They presented the content analysis of the student reflection assignments.
At the end of the session, verbal feedback was received from all participants regarding the implementation. Certificates were given to all participants.
The ARCS-V motivation model scales and the RIPLS were administered to the students.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Educational Intervention Group
Participants in this group included undergraduate healthcare students from the faculties of dentistry, medicine, and health sciences at a higher education institution in Turkey. The group underwent an interprofessional education (IPE) program designed based on the ARCS-V motivational design model. The program consisted of three sessions and was delivered in a hybrid format, incorporating both online and face-to-face elements. Various tactics and strategies from the motivational model were used throughout the training process. The Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) and the ARCS-V Motivation Scale were administered to assess the students' readiness for interprofessional education and the program's effectiveness. The educational content included scenarios, multimedia elements, messages, emails, reflection assignments, and group tasks, which aimed to enhance students' motivation, interest, and overall learning experience.
Education
An Interprofessional Education Program Based on the ARCS-V Motivation Model on the Theme of "Chronic Disease Management and Patient Safety"
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Education
An Interprofessional Education Program Based on the ARCS-V Motivation Model on the Theme of "Chronic Disease Management and Patient Safety"
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Voluntarily participate in the training.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ege University
OTHER
Izmir Democracy University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Aysel Başer
assistant professor dr
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Aysel Baser, Asst Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Izmir Democracy University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Izmir, Konak, Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MedEdu1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.