Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Two Matrix Systems for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars
NCT ID: NCT06447324
Last Updated: 2024-06-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-07-01
2024-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Glass Ionomer Cement
NCT06195449
Retrospective Evaluation of Posterior Direct Restorations
NCT04827823
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624
Clinical Evaluation of a Bioactive Material
NCT04825379
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fender Mate matrix group
Twenty primary molars will be restored with composite restoration using the Fender Mate matrix
Fender Mate matrix system
Matrix Systems used for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars
Conventional T-band matrix group
Twenty primary molars will be restored with composite restoration using T-band matrix
T-band matrix
Matrix Systems used for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fender Mate matrix system
Matrix Systems used for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars
T-band matrix
Matrix Systems used for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients showing Frankel's positive and definitely positive behavior.
3. Parent willing to participate in the study and signed on informed consent.
4. Each child has at least two carious primary molars (class II) bilaterally, indicated for composite restoration with criteria as follow: -
* No history of spontaneous pain or provoked pain.
* Fully erupted teeth.
* Fully erupted adjacent tooth.
* Caries involving two surfaces - proximal and occlusal
* Absence of clinical signs or symptoms suggesting a non-vital tooth such as sinus tract, soft tissue swelling, mobility or tenderness to percussion.
* No pathological external or internal root resorption.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Children having primary molars with:
* Caries involving less than or more than two surfaces
* Extensively damaged teeth
* Missing adjacent tooth.
* Mobility.
* Spaced dentition.
4 Years
9 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aswan University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Noha Elsayed Fathi Abdou
Lecturer at Pediatric Dentistry Department, Preventive Dentistry and Dental Public Health
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dindukurthi MK, Setty JV, Srinivasan I, Melwani AM, Manasa Hegde K, Radhakrishna S. Restoration of Proximal Contacts in Decayed Primary Molars Using Three Different Matrix Systems in Children Aged 5-9 Years: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Jan-Feb;14(1):70-74. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1929.
Bhatia HP, Sood S, Sharma N, Singh A, Rajagopal V. Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Efficiency and Patient Acceptability toward the Use of Circumferential Matrix and Sectional Matrix for Restoration of Class II Cavities in Primary Molars: An In Vivo Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2021 Nov-Dec;14(6):748-751. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2060.
Gomes IA, Filho EM, Mariz DC, Borges AH, Tonetto MR, Firoozmand LM, Kuga CM, De Jesus RR, Bandeca MC. In vivo Evaluation of Proximal Resin Composite Restorations performed using Three Different Matrix Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2015 Aug 1;16(8):643-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1735.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
matrix system for 1ry teeth
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.