Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Glass Ionomer Cement
NCT ID: NCT06195449
Last Updated: 2024-05-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-06-01
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconomer Restorative
NCT06254053
Radiographic Assessment of Glass Ionomer Restorations With and Without Prior Application of Nano Silver Fluoride in Occlusal Carious Molars Treated With Partial Caries Removal Technique
NCT03193606
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624
Clinical Performance of Alkasite-based Restorations in Children
NCT07263555
Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Alkasite Restoration Versus Resin Modified Glass Ionomer in Adult With Class V Carious
NCT04716517
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Secondary or recurrent caries is characterized as "lesions that occur at the edges of previously placed dental restorations" or "caries that develop in association with dental restorations or sealants" (CARS).Proper seal at the tooth surface restoration interface is essential . That's why the most frequently material used is (GIC) with the advantage of chemical adhesion to tooth structure, superior esthetics, and long-term fluoride release providing cariostatic effect, but it has the disadvantage of slow setting rate, low fracture toughness, susceptibility to moisture contamination, dehydration during initial phase of setting, and poor wear resistance.
Resin Modified Glass Ionomer and Composite have always been the preferred material for restoration although several modifications have been made recently to improve its properties, Cent ion N is one of the recent ones.
Cent ion N is a tooth-colored basic filling material for direct restoration. It belongs to the material of Alka sites, with high flexural strength. It also has calcium and fluoride releasing properties comparable to conventional GIC, besides it is quick and easy to use.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Alkasite restorative material in primary molar
ARM 1 : ALKASITE RESTORATIVE MATERIAL( INTERVENTION)
ALKASITE RESTORATIVE MATERIAL
Restorative material for primary teeth
Glass Ionomer Cement in primary molar
ARM2: Glass Ionomer Cement(CONTROL)
Glass Ionomer Cement
Restorative material for primary teeth
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ALKASITE RESTORATIVE MATERIAL
Restorative material for primary teeth
Glass Ionomer Cement
Restorative material for primary teeth
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2\. Children between age 5 and 7 years. 3. Both male and female are included. 4. Cooperative Children.
Exclusion Criteria
5 Years
7 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ola Yasir Abdulaziz Mahmoud
principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sherien Ezz Eldin, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
cairo university faculty of pediatric dentistry
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
ola yasir mahmoud, master candidate
Role: CONTACT
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sharma H, Suprabha BS, Shenoy R, Rao A, Kotian H. Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2023 Jun;24(3):301-311. doi: 10.1007/s40368-023-00788-0. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
Hegazi, R.I., W.E. Jamil, and A. Fawzy, Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Performance of Three Different Glass Hybrid Restorations in High Caries Risk Patients: A Randomized Control Trial. Dental Science Updates, 2023. 4(1): p. 171-183.
Bepu, D., et al., Alksite-based material to restore endodontically treated teeth: A randomized controlled clinical trial. 2023.
Pooja MP, Karuna YM, Rao A, Suman E, Natarajan S, Suprabha BS. Comparative Evaluation of the Sealing Ability of an Alkasite Restorative Material and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement in Primary Molars: An In vivo Study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2022 Apr-Jun;13(2):113-117. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_345_20. Epub 2022 Jun 21.
9. Derchi, G., et al., Clinical Performance of CentionTM Alkasite Restorative Material vs. Glass Ionomer Cement Used in Deciduous Teeth: One-Year Evaluation. Applied Sciences, 2022. 12(21): p. 10845.
8. Attia, R., et al., Clinical Performance of Alkasite Dental Material and High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations in Class I Cavities. Comparative Study for One Year Follow Up. Egyptian Dental Journal, 2022. 68(4): p. 3881-3894.
Arora D, Jain M, Suma Sogi HP, Shahi P, Gupta I, Sandhu M. In vivo evaluation of clinical performance of Cention N and glass ionomer cement in proximal restorations of primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2022 Jan-Mar;40(1):23-29. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_108_21.
Mushtaq U, Mushtaq F, Thakur D, Rathee K, Poonia N, Khullar S. Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity Following Restoration of Class I Lesions with Different Restorative Materials: An In Vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):650-654.
5. Minocha, A., et al., Comparative evaluation of Cention N and Amalgam in Class II posterior restorations. UNIVERSITY JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2021. 7(1).
4. Roulet, J., et al., In vitro wear of two bioactive composites and a glass ionomer cement. DZZ International, 2019. 1(1): p. 24-30.
3. Dodiya, P.V., et al., Clinical evaluation of cention-n and nano hybrid composite resin as a restoration of noncarious cervical lesion. J Dent Specialities, 2019. 7(1): p. 3-5.
2. Modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) Ryge Criteria for Direct Clinical Evaluation of Restoration. 1995.
1. Class, V., Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different restorative materials (Cention N, Zirconomer improved and Glass hybrid restorative system) in Class V cavity restoration using stereomicroscope: In vitro study.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
alkasite material
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.