Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconomer Restorative
NCT ID: NCT06254053
Last Updated: 2024-07-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-01
2025-01-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Alkasite Restorative Material Versus Glass Ionomer Cement
NCT06195449
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Highly Translucent Nano Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Filling Versus Conventional Resin Composite Restorations in Patients With Proximal Carious Teeth. (A One-year Randomized Clinical Trial).
NCT05403008
Custom-made Versus Prefabricated Zirconia Crowns for Primary Molars.
NCT04620174
Restoration Repairs Using Composite Resin Versus Glass Ionomer in Primary Molars: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT04491981
Evaluation of Performance and Occlusal Wear of Low Shrinkage Giomer Compared to Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT05949502
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Zirconomer Restorative material in primary molar
Arm one zirconomer restorative material (intervention)
zirconia reinforced glass ionomer
Restorative material
Glass Ionomer Cement in primary molar
Arm two Glass Ionomer cement (control)
Glass ionomer cement
Restorative material
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
zirconia reinforced glass ionomer
Restorative material
Glass ionomer cement
Restorative material
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Children between age 5 and 7 years.
3. Both male and female are included.
4. Cooperative Children.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Patients with systemic diseases.
2. Parent refuse to participate.
5 Years
7 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tamador Ahmed Ibrahim
DR tamador ahmed
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
sherien ez zaldein, professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cairo University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nanavati K, Katge F, Chimata VK, Pradhan D, Kamble A, Patil D. Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Bioactive Restorative Material, Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement and Conventional Glass Ionomer Cement to the Dentinal Surface of Primary Molars: an in vitro Study. J Dent (Shiraz). 2021 Dec;22(4):260-266. doi: 10.30476/DENTJODS.2021.87115.1230.
Kukreja R, Singla S, Bhadoria N, Pawar P, Gupta K, Khandelwal D, Dewani N. An In Vitro Study to Compare the Release of Fluoride from Glass Ionomer Cement (Fuji IX) and Zirconomer. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):35-37. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2141.
undefined
Mushtaq U, Mushtaq F, Thakur D, Rathee K, Poonia N, Khullar S. Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity Following Restoration of Class I Lesions with Different Restorative Materials: An In Vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Jun 1;22(6):650-654.
Arora D, Jain M, Suma Sogi HP, Shahi P, Gupta I, Sandhu M. In vivo evaluation of clinical performance of Cention N and glass ionomer cement in proximal restorations of primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2022 Jan-Mar;40(1):23-29. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_108_21.
Albeshti R, Shahid S. Evaluation of Microleakage in Zirconomer(R): A Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018 Jun;52(2):97-104. doi: 10.15644/asc52/2/2.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
cairo university
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Evaluation of zirconomer
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.