Partial Caries Removal in Permanent Molars Restored Using Giomer

NCT ID: NCT06601972

Last Updated: 2024-09-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

122 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-01

Study Completion Date

2026-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Dental manufacturers\' constant tweaks and improvements to composite compositions have resulted in a wider spectrum of restorative materials with positive long-term clinical performance. For example, the creation of bioactive giomer material with proven continuous multi-ion release has been beneficial in avoiding demineralization and imparting acid resistance to enamel and dentin.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Giomer resin not only reduces the risk of secondary caries around restorations by releasing fluoride ions, but it also has good esthetic, physical, and handling features. Furthermore, advancements have been made to reduce giomer resin polymerization shrinkage by incorporating filler technology into the matrix system. As a result of these efforts, giomer resin is currently distinguished by its low shrinkage feature. According to the manufacturer, low shrinkage giomer resin has volumetric shrinkage of 0.8% and a polymerization shrinkage stress of 2.72 MPa. Several investigations were carried out to examine the overall clinical performance of low shrinkage giomer resin with equivalent success rates when compared to other restorative materials. The aim of the current study is to evaluate the effect of giomer in maintaining pulp health and dentin bridge formation after partial caries removal in permanent teeth with deep occlusal carious lesion when compared to resin composite restoration.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Caries, Dental

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Giomer

Low-shrinkage bioactive material

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Beautifil II LS (Low-Shrinkage)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The most remarkable feature of this light-cured universal composite for anterior and posterior restorations is its unique shrinkage of 0.85 percent by volume

Nanohybrid composite

Universal Nano-hybrid composite

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Nanohybrid resin composite

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Nanohybrid resin composites are the most popular, because they improve the distribution of fillers in the matrix by combining nanoparticles with submicron particles to achieve better mechanical, chemical, and optical properties

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Beautifil II LS (Low-Shrinkage)

The most remarkable feature of this light-cured universal composite for anterior and posterior restorations is its unique shrinkage of 0.85 percent by volume

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Nanohybrid resin composite

Nanohybrid resin composites are the most popular, because they improve the distribution of fillers in the matrix by combining nanoparticles with submicron particles to achieve better mechanical, chemical, and optical properties

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 -35 years.
* Not received antibiotic therapy since 1 month before sampling.
* Males or Females (Both genders).
* Co-operative patients approving the trial.
* Good to fair oral hygiene

* Class I cavitated lesions in permanent molars (reaching \>1/2 of the dentin on radiographic examination)
* Absence of spontaneous pain; negative sensitivity to percussion; and absence of periapical lesions (radiographic examination).

Exclusion Criteria

* known allergic reaction to resinous materials.
* Systemic disease or severe medical complications.
* Periodontal problem.
* Bruxism
* Poor oral hygiene

* Class II caries lesion
* Shallow or enamel caries
* Teeth with periapical lesions.
* Mobile teeth, arrest caries and non-vital teeth
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

NewGiza University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Omar Shaalan

Associate professor of conservative dentistry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Omar O Shaalan, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+201122665661

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

giomervscomp

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.