Retention Rate of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional
NCT ID: NCT03264105
Last Updated: 2017-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
19 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-12-31
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional Resin-Based Flowable Composite in Initially Demineralized Pits and Fissure: A One Year, Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03242291
Retention Rate and Caries Preventive Effect of Preheated Flowable Resin Composite Used as a Pit and Fissure Sealant
NCT05606874
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638
Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Base Versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT04019145
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Several materials and techniques have been developed to enhance the longevity of pit-and-fissure sealants, including the use of flowable composite resins as pit-and-fissure sealants . However, the clinical longevity of flowable composite as fissure sealants is directly related to their retention, where the percentage of rate of retention differ on a 12-month follow-up examination were the partial loss rate of flowable composite material ranges from 15.5% to 16.5% and total loss were ranged from 12.7% to 13%, while on a 24-month follow-up examination the partial loss rate ranged from 18.1% to 20% and total loss rate ranged from 15.6% to 17%, and that depends on morphology of pits and fissures, adequate isolation, conditioning of enamel, application techniques, particular material characteristics like viscosity, surface tension, adequate adhesion and penetration of the material into the previously etched system of fissures.
In order to overcome the shortcomings of traditional dental composites, nanofibers or nanotubes fillers are broadly used in the academia and industry. The type of Nanofibers and Nanotubes used to reinforce dental resin composites include polymeric nanofibers, metallic nanofibers, and inorganic hydroxyapatide (HAP) nanofibers. The Hydroxyapatite Nanofibers are calcium phosphates fillers that allow the release of mineral from dental resin composite. Also HAP nanofibers possessing sufficiently high slenderness ratios and relatively long and thin structure, and create a lot of bonding points in the interface with polymeric matrix. When the composites suffer from huge pressure this allow tremendous stress transfer from weak polymeric matrix to tough HAP nanofibers; and consequently increase the mechanical properties of resin composite. So this study will examine the effect of adding HAP nanofibers on the clinical performances and retention rate of flowable resin composite.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NovaPro™ Flow
NovaPro™ Flow Flowable Composite, Nanova Biomaterials company, USA
Hydroxyapatite Nanofiber reinforced flowable composite
retention rate evaluation of Hydroxyapatite Nanofiber reinforced flowable composite
conventional resin-based flowable composite
retention rate evaluation of conventional resin-based flowable composite
Conventional resin-based flowable composite
Filtek™Supreme Ultra Flowable Restorative, 3M ESPE company, USA
Hydroxyapatite Nanofiber reinforced flowable composite
retention rate evaluation of Hydroxyapatite Nanofiber reinforced flowable composite
conventional resin-based flowable composite
retention rate evaluation of conventional resin-based flowable composite
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hydroxyapatite Nanofiber reinforced flowable composite
retention rate evaluation of Hydroxyapatite Nanofiber reinforced flowable composite
conventional resin-based flowable composite
retention rate evaluation of conventional resin-based flowable composite
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
safinaz hussien fahmy hassan
dental resident
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEBC-CU-2017-07-31
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.