Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations

NCT ID: NCT03608306

Last Updated: 2018-08-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-31

Study Completion Date

2020-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Clinical performance of bioactive restorative material versus glass hybrid restorative in posterior restorations of high caries risk patients will be evaluated over 12 months using Fédération Dentaire Internationale' (FDI) clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The application of resin composite has been described as "technique sensitive". Although glass ionomers are inferior to resin composite in esthetics, there are specific clinical situations where glass ionomers are the materials of choice for restoring teeth as patients at risk for caries and with carious lesions due to its ability to release fluoride and to self-adhere to enamel and dentin.

However, Conventional glass ionomer have poor physical and mechanical properties and are more liable to wear when compared to resin composite. The change in formulation of resin modified glass ionomer restorations allowed them to have improved physic-mechanical properties, combined with significant improvement in esthetic properties. Thus, in recent years glass ionomer as direct restorative materials have become more user friendly. Unfortunately, most of glass ionomers are not recommended as definitive final restorations for the permanent dentition in stress bearing areas because they do not have the physical and mechanical properties of amalgam or composite resin.

ACTIVA™ BioACTIVE-RESTORATIVE™ is recently introduced enhanced resin modified glass ionomer, which the manufacturer (Pulpdent Corporation, USA) reports to be the first bioactive dental materials with an ionic resin matrix, a shock-absorbing resin component, and bioactive fillers that mimic physical and chemical properties of natural teeth. They are durable, fracture and wear resistant, chemically bond to teeth, seal against bacterial microleakage, and release and recharge with calcium, phosphate, and more fluoride ions than glass ionomers. Thus, ACTIVA has more release and recharge of calcium, phosphate and fluoride than glass ionomers with the esthetics, strength, and physical properties of composites, combining the best attributes of both materials without compromising either one.

EQUIA® Forte is a fluoride-releasing, bulk-fill system which consists of EQUIA® Forte Fil, a high strength glass hybrid restorative, and EQUIA® Forte Coat, a wear-resistant, self-adhesive, light-cured resin coating. With improved flexural strength, and acid and wear resistance, the manufacturer claims that EQUIA® Forte extends the recommended indications to include stress-bearing Class II restorations.

The clinical performance of these materials regarding functional, esthetic and biological properties is yet to be evaluated. The FDI clinical criteria provide more detailed evaluation criteria and better differentiation between different types of failure; and incorporate objective assessment tools and a clear scoring system than other scoring systems. Thus, this study aims to contribute to providing evidence-based literature concerning current innovative Resin-modified glass ionomer restorations using the most updated and standardized assessment criteria, namely the FDI.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Restoration Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Resin-modified glass ionomer

Activa Bioactive-Restorative is an enhanced resin modified glass ionomer (RMGI) with an ionic resin matrix, a shock-absorbing resin component, and bioactive fillers that mimic the physical and chemical properties of natural teeth.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Resin-modified glass ionomer

Intervention Type OTHER

enhanced RMGIs with an ionic resin matrix, a shock-absorbing resin component, and bioactive fillers that mimic the physical and chemical properties of natural teeth.

Bulk-fill glass hybrid restorative

EQUIA Forte is a bulk-fill, fluoride-releasing restorative system that combines EQUIA Forte Fil, which is a high strength glass hybrid restorative, and EQUIA Forte Coat, a wear-resistant, self-adhesive, light-cured resin coating.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Bulk-fill glass hybrid restorative

Intervention Type OTHER

It's a bulk-fill, fluoride-releasing restorative system that combines EQUIA Forte Fil, which is a high strength glass hybrid restorative, and EQUIA Forte Coat, a wear-resistant, self-adhesive, light-cured resin coating.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Resin-modified glass ionomer

enhanced RMGIs with an ionic resin matrix, a shock-absorbing resin component, and bioactive fillers that mimic the physical and chemical properties of natural teeth.

Intervention Type OTHER

Bulk-fill glass hybrid restorative

It's a bulk-fill, fluoride-releasing restorative system that combines EQUIA Forte Fil, which is a high strength glass hybrid restorative, and EQUIA Forte Coat, a wear-resistant, self-adhesive, light-cured resin coating.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Activa Bioactive-Restorative EQUIA Forte

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* High caries risk patients with multiple posterior cavitated carious lesions
* Co-operative patients approving to participate in the study.
* Pulp asymptomatic vital carious posterior teeth.
* Presence of favorable occlusion and teeth are in normal contact with the adjacent teeth.

Exclusion Criteria

* Low caries risk patients.
* Anterior carious lesions
* Lack of compliance
* Severe medical complications.
* Pregnancy.
* Evidence of parafunctional habits
* Temporomandibular joint disorders
* Teeth with signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mona mahmoud Abd Elrahman

Principal Investigator and PHD student at Conservative Dentistry Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mai M Yousry, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor of Conservative Dentistry, Cairo University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mona M Abd Elrahman, Master

Role: CONTACT

1142077937 ext. +02

Mai M Aka, PhD

Role: CONTACT

1066444572 ext. +20

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bansal R, Burgess J, Lawson NC. Wear of an enhanced resin-modified glass-ionomer restorative material. Am J Dent. 2016 Jun;29(3):171-4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27505995 (View on PubMed)

Fleming GJ, Awan M, Cooper PR, Sloan AJ. The potential of a resin-composite to be cured to a 4mm depth. Dent Mater. 2008 Apr;24(4):522-9. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.016. Epub 2007 Jul 31.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17669481 (View on PubMed)

Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjor I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation: clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations-update and clinical examples. Clin Oral Investig. 2010 Aug;14(4):349-66. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0432-8. Epub 2010 Jul 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20628774 (View on PubMed)

Hickel R, Roulet JF, Bayne S, Heintze SD, Mjor IA, Peters M, Rousson V, Randall R, Schmalz G, Tyas M, Vanherle G. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2007 Mar;11(1):5-33. doi: 10.1007/s00784-006-0095-7. Epub 2007 Jan 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17262225 (View on PubMed)

Pameijer CH, Garcia-Godoy F, Morrow BR, Jefferies SR. Flexural strength and flexural fatigue properties of resin-modified glass ionomers. J Clin Dent. 2015;26(1):23-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26054188 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBD-CU-2018-07-11

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.