Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations

NCT ID: NCT06803537

Last Updated: 2025-05-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aimed to perform a comparison between the clinical performance of short fiber-reinforced composite and indirect lab composite restorations in posterior dentition.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Occlusal Caries Proximal Caries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fiber-reinforced composite

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

indirect lab composite

Intervention Type OTHER

indirect lab processed resin composite inlay restorations

Conventional resin composite

Intervention Type OTHER

conventional microhybrid resin composite posterior restorations

Indirect lab composite

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fiber-reinforced composite

Intervention Type OTHER

short fiber-reinforced composite used as base covered by conventional composite

Conventional resin composite

Intervention Type OTHER

conventional microhybrid resin composite posterior restorations

Conventional microhybrid resin composite

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Fiber-reinforced composite

Intervention Type OTHER

short fiber-reinforced composite used as base covered by conventional composite

indirect lab composite

Intervention Type OTHER

indirect lab processed resin composite inlay restorations

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fiber-reinforced composite

short fiber-reinforced composite used as base covered by conventional composite

Intervention Type OTHER

indirect lab composite

indirect lab processed resin composite inlay restorations

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional resin composite

conventional microhybrid resin composite posterior restorations

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients aged 20-35 year from both genders.
2. Good oral hygiene: patients with low and moderate caries risk (according to Caries management by caries risk assessment CAMBRA sheets) were enrolled in this study.
3. The visual examination should reveal the presence of a minimum of three primary occlusal or proximal caries (Black Class I and II) with a severity score of 4 or 5 according to the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS).
4. The carious teeth must exhibit vitality and do not display periapical radiolucency as evaluated by periapical radiography.
5. The selected teeth must be under stable occlusion.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Uncontrolled systemic disease
2. Extremely poor oral hygiene
3. Chronic periodontitis
4. Heavy bruxism
5. Cavities with a buccolingual width exceeding two-thirds of the intercuspal distance or requiring cusp covering.
6. Patients undergoing orthodontic procedures.
7. Patients unable to attend the scheduled recall appointments.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mansoura university

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

A02071221

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA