Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations
NCT ID: NCT03515265
Last Updated: 2021-01-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
56 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-01
2020-03-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Performance of Two Fiber Reinforced Resin Composites Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria
NCT05380973
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638
Clinical Evaluation of Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Base Versus Incremental Packing of Nanohybrid Resin Composite
NCT04019145
Wear Measurement of Opposing Enamel to Milled Resin Matrix Ceramic Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite After 2 Years
NCT06807125
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Endodontically treated teeth were restored traditionally by crown but this approach is invasive with many technical and clinical steps that prolong the time of treatment. Adhesive philosophy and resin composite were developed and enhanced within the last thirty years that give clinician conservative option also strengthen, protect the tooth against fracture and changed the doctrine of devitalized tooth must be restored by crown. Current studies encourage applying conservative approach and restoring endodontically treated teeth with bonded restorations, so a lot of classic indications of crown in restoring endodontically treated teeth are questioned now.
Microhybrid resin composite restorations permit application of conservative approach that preserves remaining sound tooth structure. Fiber reinforced resin composite improved strength, toughness and fracture resistance of conventional resin composite and restored teeth.
Fiber reinforcement of conventional resin composite is introduced aiming to improve their physical, mechanical properties and tooth fracture resistance. The improvement of the properties was interpreted due to the rule of fibers in stopping crack propagation and transferring stress from matrix to fibers, also it was suggested that fiber Reinforced Resin Composites decrease polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress. fiber-reinforced resin composites are used as a dentine substitute combined with conventional resin composites as an enamel replacement.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fiber resin composite
Fiber reinforced resin composite restoration used as dentin substitute covered by conventional resin composite
Fiber reinforced resin composite restoration
a type of resin composite with improved strength due to the fiber's action
Microhybrid resin composite
Microhybrid resin composite restoration with lower strength compared to Fiber reinforced resin composite restoration
Microhybrid resin composite restoration
a type of conventional resin composite
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fiber reinforced resin composite restoration
a type of resin composite with improved strength due to the fiber's action
Microhybrid resin composite restoration
a type of conventional resin composite
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Co-operative patients approving to participate in the study.
* Endodontically treated molar with minimum to moderate loss of tooth structure.
* Presence of antagonists
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with parafunctional habits.
* Patients with temporomandibular joint disorders.
* Teeth with failed endodontic therapy or extensive caries.
* Pregnant female
18 Years
55 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sherifa Ahmed Abdelaziz Kandil
Assistant lecturer at Conservative Dentistry Department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mohamed Farid, PHD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Professor of Conservative Dentistry, Cairo University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Dentistry
Giza, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Abouelleil H, Pradelle N, Villat C, Attik N, Colon P, Grosgogeat B. Comparison of mechanical properties of a new fiber reinforced composite and bulk filling composites. Restor Dent Endod. 2015 Nov;40(4):262-70. doi: 10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.262. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Fiber reinforced resin composite
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CEBD-CU-2018-04-22
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.