Clinical Performance of Fiber Reinforced Composite Versus Microhybrid Composite Restorations

NCT ID: NCT03515265

Last Updated: 2021-01-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-01

Study Completion Date

2020-03-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Clinical performance of direct fiber reinforced resin composite restorations versus direct microhybrid resin composite restorations in endodontically treated molars will be evaluated over 12 months using modified USPHS criteria.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Restoration of endodontically treated teeth is one of the main challenges in restorative dentistry. There are structural changes in endodontically treated tooth: dehydration of dentin, mutation of collagen due to the effect of irrigation and reduction of hardness. This alteration together with loss of tooth structure inflicts a negative impact on long term prognosis of the endodontically treated tooth increases incidence of dental fracture.

Endodontically treated teeth were restored traditionally by crown but this approach is invasive with many technical and clinical steps that prolong the time of treatment. Adhesive philosophy and resin composite were developed and enhanced within the last thirty years that give clinician conservative option also strengthen, protect the tooth against fracture and changed the doctrine of devitalized tooth must be restored by crown. Current studies encourage applying conservative approach and restoring endodontically treated teeth with bonded restorations, so a lot of classic indications of crown in restoring endodontically treated teeth are questioned now.

Microhybrid resin composite restorations permit application of conservative approach that preserves remaining sound tooth structure. Fiber reinforced resin composite improved strength, toughness and fracture resistance of conventional resin composite and restored teeth.

Fiber reinforcement of conventional resin composite is introduced aiming to improve their physical, mechanical properties and tooth fracture resistance. The improvement of the properties was interpreted due to the rule of fibers in stopping crack propagation and transferring stress from matrix to fibers, also it was suggested that fiber Reinforced Resin Composites decrease polymerization shrinkage and shrinkage stress. fiber-reinforced resin composites are used as a dentine substitute combined with conventional resin composites as an enamel replacement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Restoration Failure of Marginal Integrity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Fiber resin composite

Fiber reinforced resin composite restoration used as dentin substitute covered by conventional resin composite

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fiber reinforced resin composite restoration

Intervention Type OTHER

a type of resin composite with improved strength due to the fiber's action

Microhybrid resin composite

Microhybrid resin composite restoration with lower strength compared to Fiber reinforced resin composite restoration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Microhybrid resin composite restoration

Intervention Type OTHER

a type of conventional resin composite

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Fiber reinforced resin composite restoration

a type of resin composite with improved strength due to the fiber's action

Intervention Type OTHER

Microhybrid resin composite restoration

a type of conventional resin composite

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ever X posterior

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with Good oral hygiene.
* Co-operative patients approving to participate in the study.
* Endodontically treated molar with minimum to moderate loss of tooth structure.
* Presence of antagonists

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with advanced periodontal disease.
* Patients with parafunctional habits.
* Patients with temporomandibular joint disorders.
* Teeth with failed endodontic therapy or extensive caries.
* Pregnant female
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sherifa Ahmed Abdelaziz Kandil

Assistant lecturer at Conservative Dentistry Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohamed Farid, PHD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Professor of Conservative Dentistry, Cairo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dentistry

Giza, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abouelleil H, Pradelle N, Villat C, Attik N, Colon P, Grosgogeat B. Comparison of mechanical properties of a new fiber reinforced composite and bulk filling composites. Restor Dent Endod. 2015 Nov;40(4):262-70. doi: 10.5395/rde.2015.40.4.262. Epub 2015 Sep 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26587411 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBD-CU-2018-04-22

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA