Comparing Between Two Different Restoration

NCT ID: NCT05556551

Last Updated: 2022-09-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-20

Study Completion Date

2022-07-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Clinical performance of two different ceramic restoration in patient mouth after 3 years follow up

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Comparing two different dental restoration in patient mouth after 3 years follow up by using USPHS criteria

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Restoration Failure

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two different restorations in patient mouth
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Different restoration inserted in the patient mouth

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hybrid resin ceramic restoration

Dental restoration

Group Type OTHER

Hybrid resin Ceramic restoration

Intervention Type OTHER

Hybrid resin Ceramic restoration

Full ceramic restoration

Dental restoration

Group Type OTHER

Full Ceramic restoration

Intervention Type OTHER

Two different dental restoration inserted in patient mouth ( split mouth)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Full Ceramic restoration

Two different dental restoration inserted in patient mouth ( split mouth)

Intervention Type OTHER

Hybrid resin Ceramic restoration

Hybrid resin Ceramic restoration

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* good oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria

* bad oral hygiene
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mansoura University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Amr hany hassan

Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Rubinstein MH. A new granulation method for compressed tablets [proceedings]. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1976 Dec;28 Suppl:67P. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12345 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

7755100

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA