Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-10-01

Study Completion Date

2021-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to compare one-year clinical performance of indirect restoration fabricated from nano hybrid composite CAD CAM blocks and ceramic blocks

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations

NCT07265609

Dental Restoration Failure

COMPLETED NA

Effect of Modeling Resin on Anterior Direct Composite Veneer

NCT06485024

Dental Wear Dental Decay

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT

NCT04720638

Decay, Dental Caries Class II

UNKNOWN NA

Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional Resin-Based Flowable Composite in Initially Demineralized Pits and Fissure: A One Year, Randomized Clinical Trial

NCT03242291

Marginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nanofiber Reinforced Flowable Composite

UNKNOWN NA

Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations

NCT03608306

Dental Restoration Failure

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This research is conducted for comparing the clinical efficacy of nano hybrid composite blocks and ceramic blocks ., the choice of nano hybrid composite blocks based on the claim of the manufacturer, as it's considered to be promising , nano hybrid composite blocks has the highest fillers content (86% by weight), resembles natural teeth perfectly , Excellent physical values for flexural strength and abrasion, No firing required (a real one step ), can be processed using any conventional milling unit, can be finished and polished optimally, Ideal for grinding even in cases with thin edges.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Teeth Restoration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ceramic cad cam blocks

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ceramic cad cam blocks

Intervention Type DRUG

ceramic cad cam blocks

composite cad cam blocks

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

composite blocks

Intervention Type DRUG

cad cam composite blocks

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

composite blocks

cad cam composite blocks

Intervention Type DRUG

ceramic cad cam blocks

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with badly broken vital teeth
* Young adult Males or female
* Good oral hygiene measures
* Cooperative patients approving to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a compromised medical history.
* Severe or active periodontal disease
* Severe medical complications
* Lack of compliance
* Endodontically treated teeth

Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes