Evaluation of 3D Printed Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK) and Milled PEEK Indirect Restorations Compared to Hybird Resin Composite Indirect Restorations Over One Year Period of Time ( A Randomized Clinical Trial )

NCT ID: NCT06092697

Last Updated: 2023-10-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-31

Study Completion Date

2025-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Clinical performance evaluation of 3D Printed Polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and milled PEEK indirect restorations compared to hybird resin composite indirect restorations over one year period of time

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of this study is to evaluate fracture and retention, wear of 3D printed PEEK indirect restorations and milled PEEK indirect restorations compared to milled indirect hybrid resin composite restorations according to FDI criteria over one year.

According to indirect restorations cavity preparation principles, shade selection and occlusal examination will be done preoperatively, followed by cavity preparations that will be carried out with tapered diamond stones.

The prepared teeth for the indirect restorations will be scanned with an optical scanner. Then restorations will be designed by a CAD software and files will be made in STL format, so as to be ready for either 3D printing or milling with different materials.

While the printed PEEK restorations are additively made, the milled PEEK and hybrid composite restorations are both milled out of either a disc or block ( size 12) using a CAD/CAM milling machine.

After the printing and the milling procedures are complete, the restorations are then promptly removed. Each restoration will be assessed and adjusted for its cavity after the occlusal surface is recontoured. This post-processing adjustments will be applied to both 3d printed ones and milled restorations. After assessment and needed adjustments are done, all restorations will be cemented into the cavities in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.

For each recall examination, two independent evaluators will perform the direct clinical evaluation for the fracture and retention at baseline, after 6 and 12 months using written criteria based on FDI world dental federation criteria. Together with the wear testing that will be performed by scanning of the restoration surfaces at baseline, after 6 and 12 months. Using parallel confocal technology, a 3D dental scanner (CEREC Primescan; Sirona, Bensheim, Germany) to attain the 3D Standard Tessellation Language (STL) models will be used. These scan models will be then introduced through a wear measuring software (Geomagic Design X; 3D Systems, Seoul, Korea) which will import, analyze, and superimpose the digitalized 3D models. So, it will automatically calculate the amount of occlusal volume lose due to wear.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Clinical Performance

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

A superiority frame randomized, controlled, parallel clinical trial with 1:1 allocation ratio.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

3D printed PEEK

Indirect dental restoration

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3D printed PEEK restorations

Intervention Type OTHER

Indirect dental restoration

Milled PEEK

Indirect dental restoration

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3D printed PEEK restorations

Intervention Type OTHER

Indirect dental restoration

Hybird resin composite

Indirect dental restoration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

3D printed PEEK restorations

Intervention Type OTHER

Indirect dental restoration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

3D printed PEEK restorations

Indirect dental restoration

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Milled PEEK

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients aging (18-45) years.
* Patients with a high level of oral hygiene.
* Each patient enrolled in the study should have moderate carious lesion or defective restoration needs to be replaced on a mandibular permanent molar.
* Patients with ability to attend periodical follow-ups.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with general/systemic diseases or allergies.
* Patients with chronic use of anti- inflammatory, analgesic, and psychotropic drugs.
* Pregnant or lactating females.
* Patients with parafunctional habits.
* Patients with experience of allergic reactions against any components of the used materials.
* Patients receiving orthodontic treatment.
* Inability to comply with study procedures.
* Collateral participation in another research study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hadeer Ahmed Abdalnaby Ahmed Attia

Lecturer Assistant at MSA UNIVERSITY

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abhay SS, Ganapathy D, Veeraiyan DN, Ariga P, Heboyan A, Amornvit P, Rokaya D, Srimaneepong V. Wear Resistance, Color Stability and Displacement Resistance of Milled PEEK Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns under Stimulated Chewing and High-Performance Aging. Polymers (Basel). 2021 Oct 30;13(21):3761. doi: 10.3390/polym13213761.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34771318 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Hadeer'sPROTOCOL-PHD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA