One Year Clinical Evaluation of Pressed BioHPP Polyether Ether Ketone (PEEK)-Based Versus Zirconia-Based Single Crowns

NCT ID: NCT03697005

Last Updated: 2018-10-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-01

Study Completion Date

2019-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The clinical performance (using the modified Ryge criteria) and patient satisfaction ( using VAS questionnaire) of pressed BioHPP PEEK based posterior single crowns compared to zirconia based crowns are questionable as the peek is considered as a new material and need to be tested for future clinical application.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study is held to evaluate the clinical performance (using the modified Ryge criteria) and patient satisfaction ( using VAS questionnaire) of pressed BioHPP PEEK based posterior single crowns compared to zirconia based crowns after one year follow-up. Patients requiring posterior single crowns are collected. After teeth preparation to receive single full coverage crowns, secondary impressions were taken. The patients were divided randomly into two groups ;one group will receive pressed BioHPP PEEK single crowns (the intervention) and the other group will receive veneered zirconia single crowns (the control). Fracture of restorations (1ry outcome) using modified Ryge criteria and the marginal adaptation (2ry outcome) using modified Ryge criteria and finally the patient satisfaction (3ry outcome) using a questionnaire, all outcomes will be evaluated every 2 months with total period of follow-up of one year.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Clinical Performance Patient Satisfaction

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

patients requiring posterior single crowns.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Double blinding (trial participants and outcome assessor)

* Dental colleague assessors who are blinded about the aim of the study and participant's allocation will be responsible for assessing the outcomes of this study.
* The level of intra- and inter-examiner reliability will be determined for each assessor by the performance of a calibration session prior to the start of the trial. A training exercise to the assessors with the main investigator will help to standardize measurement techniques and parameters. An interactive calibration session will enable the investigator to quantitate the measurement variability among and between assessors and enable the optimization of the measurement process. The main supervisor will solve any conflict that may arise between the assessors by repeating the assessing and giving the final opinion.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

BioHPP PEEK single posterior crowns

BioHPP PEEK copings veneered with composite resin

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

BioHPP PEEK single posterior crowns

Intervention Type OTHER

BioHPP is a 20% ceramic reinforced, semicrystalline, thermoplastic and radiolucent polymeric material, used for fabrication of high strength fixed and removable prostheses. it has advantages of bio-compatibility, low density, light weight, shock absorption.

zirconia-based single posterior crowns

yttria stabilized tetragonal zirconia used as copings to be veneered with porcelain

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

zirconia-based single posterior crowns

Intervention Type OTHER

ZrO2, a ceramic material used for medical devices, displays good esthetic appearance, high mechanical strength, and high biocompatibility and is used in a wide range of indications, such as frameworks, implants, and abutments. In addition, it's very good long-term stability and reliability was proven in a 10-year clinical study. These excellent material properties and the transformation behavior are explained by the yttrium oxide stabilization of ZrO2.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

BioHPP PEEK single posterior crowns

BioHPP is a 20% ceramic reinforced, semicrystalline, thermoplastic and radiolucent polymeric material, used for fabrication of high strength fixed and removable prostheses. it has advantages of bio-compatibility, low density, light weight, shock absorption.

Intervention Type OTHER

zirconia-based single posterior crowns

ZrO2, a ceramic material used for medical devices, displays good esthetic appearance, high mechanical strength, and high biocompatibility and is used in a wide range of indications, such as frameworks, implants, and abutments. In addition, it's very good long-term stability and reliability was proven in a 10-year clinical study. These excellent material properties and the transformation behavior are explained by the yttrium oxide stabilization of ZrO2.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

BioHPP PEEk copings veneered with composite resin zirconia copings veneered with porcelain

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. From 18-50 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document.
2. Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations
3. Psychologically and physically able to withstand conventional dental procedures
4. Patients with teeth problems indicated for single posterior crowns:

1. Badly decayed teeth
2. Teeth restored with large filling restorations
3. Endodontically treated teeth
4. Malformed teeth
5. Malposed teeth (Tilted, over-erupted, rotated, etc.)
6. Spacing between posterior teeth
5. Able to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient less than 18 or more than 50 years
2. Patient with active resistant periodontal diseases
3. Patients with poor oral hygiene and uncooperative patients
4. Pregnant women
5. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth
6. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations
7. Lack of opposing dentition in the area of interest
8. Failed endodotically treated teeth; short or overextended, narrow, missed canal, ledge or perforated teeth (even if no clear symptoms for failure)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aya Ezzat Mohamed Ali El-shimy

Assistant lecturer, fixed prosthodontic department, faculty of dentistry

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBD-CU-2018-09-40

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Digital Techniques
NCT06805604 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1