Child and Parental Satisfaction of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-01

Study Completion Date

2026-02-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the child and parents satisfaction of Bioflx crowns compared to zirconia crowns in the restoration of primary molars. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer : Is there a difference in the child and parents satisfaction levels between BioFlx crowns and zirconia crowns in the restoration of primary molars?" The study will also assess the clinical performance of both types of crowns in terms of Retention, occlusal wear, gingival health, as well as preparation time.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Retention of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars

NCT06856070

Carious Primary Molars

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Preparation Time Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars

NCT06968767

Carious Primary Molars

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Occlusal Wear Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars

NCT06890949

Carious Primary Molars

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Clinical Evaluation of BioFlx Crowns and Preformed Zirconia Crowns on Primary Second Molars

NCT06895707

Clincal Evaluation of BioFlx Vs. Zirconia Crowns

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Comparative Evaluation of Gingival Health and Bacterial Adhesion in Bioflx vs. Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars

NCT06933927

Carious Primary Molars

NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The management of severely decayed primary teeth in pediatric dentistry often requires the use of crowns to restore function and aesthetics. Traditional stainless-steel crowns (SSCs) have been widely used due to their durability and cost-effectiveness; however, their metallic appearance and lack of aesthetic appeal have prompted the development of alternative materials such as zirconia and Bioflx crown. Zirconia crowns are recognized for their superior aesthetics and biocompatibility, making them a preferred choice for parents who prioritize appearance. However, they can present challenges in terms of retention, preparation requirements, and cost. Bioflx crowns, a newer material in pediatric dentistry, aim to combine aesthetic appeal with flexibility and improved adaptability to tooth anatomy. Despite their growing popularity, limited research directly compares the child and parental satisfaction between zirconia and Bioflx crowns. It remains unclear which material offers the best balance of functional, aesthetic, and patient-centered outcomes.This gap in knowledge hinders evidence-based decision-making when selecting crowns for pediatric patients. Zirconia crowns have gained prominence in pediatric dentistry as an alternative to stainless steel crowns for primary molars. While SSCs have long been valued for their durability and ease of placement, their metallic appearance often presents an aesthetic concern for parents and patients. Zirconia crowns provide a more natural, tooth-colored alternative, making them a preferred option in cases where aesthetics is a priority. One of the main advantages of zirconia crowns is their biocompatibility, as they demonstrate lower plaque accumulation and gingival inflammation. Additionally, zirconia crowns offer superior mechanical properties, including high flexural strength and excellent fracture resistance, making them a long-lasting restorative option. Their wear resistance further supports their use in pediatric patients, particularly those with heavy occlusal forces. This study stems from the need to bridge the gap in current research regarding the satisfaction and the effectiveness associated with Bioflx crowns. Understanding whether Bioflx crowns offer superior aesthetic and functional outcomes compared to Zirconia crowns could influence clinical decision-making in pediatric dentistry. This is especially relevant as parents increasingly seek restorations that provide both durability and a natural appearance for their children.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carious Primary Molars

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

(Group A: Performed Bioflx crowns)

Bioflx Crowns, claimed to be the first flexible, durable, and aesthetic preformed crowns for primary molars. Bioflx are monochromatic, metal-free, tooth-colored crowns made from a high-strength resin polymer used in the medical device industry, offering strength, flexibility, and durability.These crowns are autoclavable and are claimed to require similar tooth preparation as SSCs.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

(Group A: Bioflx crowns)

Intervention Type OTHER

prepartion:1.The mesiodistal width of the tooth will be measured using calipers and a closely fitted crown will be selected based on the measurements.

2.The tooth will be prepared similarly to stainless steel crowns (SSCs): • Occlusal reduction of approximately 1-1.5 mm will be done using a diamond bur.Mesial and distal reduction of no more than 1 mm will be performed using a No. 169L diamond bur.Depending on the tooth anatomy, either no buccal and lingual reduction will be needed, or a minimal reduction will be done. 3.All sharp line angles and corners will be smoothed to ensure proper crown fit. 4.The crown will be checked for proper fit before cementation. It will be positioned to extend 1 mm below the gingival margin. 5.The crown will be cemented using luting glass ionomer cement (GIC). The crown will be held with firm, constant pressure until the cement sets initially.

6.The marginal fit will be evaluated, and necessary adjustments will be made. 7.The occlusion will be checked.

(Group B: Preformed zirconia crown)

Zirconia crowns brought a concept shift in esthetics of crowns; they are the most esthetic option available for treating primary molars. These crowns are resilient, tooth-colored, and highly polished. Zirconia crowns provide a more natural, tooth-colored alternative, making them a preferred option in cases where aesthetics is a priority.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

(Group B: Preformed Zirconia crown

Intervention Type OTHER

1. Crown Selection: The mesiodistal dimension of the corresponding tooth will be measured . to select the appropriate size.
2. Occlusal Reduction: The marginal ridge of adjacent teeth will be used as a reference point and a 1.5-2 mm of occlusal reduction will be performed to allow proper crown seating.
3. Bucco-Lingual Reduction: The bucco-lingual wall will be reduced by approximately 1-1.5 mm using a flame-shaped diamond bur.
4. Interproximal Reduction: 1mm of interproximal reduction will be performed using a flame-shaped diamond bur such as a .368 or .330tapered carbide bur.
5. Feather Margin Preparation: Subgingival reduction of 1-2 mm will be done using a flame-shaped diamond bur, creating a feathered margin to achieve a passive fit.
6. Trial Fitting of the Crown: The crown will be tried in to ensure proper adaptation. until the crown fits passively and extends sub gingivally by 1-2 mm wit.
7. Glass ionomer cement will be used for cementation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

(Group A: Bioflx crowns)

prepartion:1.The mesiodistal width of the tooth will be measured using calipers and a closely fitted crown will be selected based on the measurements.

2.The tooth will be prepared similarly to stainless steel crowns (SSCs): • Occlusal reduction of approximately 1-1.5 mm will be done using a diamond bur.Mesial and distal reduction of no more than 1 mm will be performed using a No. 169L diamond bur.Depending on the tooth anatomy, either no buccal and lingual reduction will be needed, or a minimal reduction will be done. 3.All sharp line angles and corners will be smoothed to ensure proper crown fit. 4.The crown will be checked for proper fit before cementation. It will be positioned to extend 1 mm below the gingival margin. 5.The crown will be cemented using luting glass ionomer cement (GIC). The crown will be held with firm, constant pressure until the cement sets initially.

6.The marginal fit will be evaluated, and necessary adjustments will be made. 7.The occlusion will be checked.

Intervention Type OTHER

(Group B: Preformed Zirconia crown

1. Crown Selection: The mesiodistal dimension of the corresponding tooth will be measured . to select the appropriate size.
2. Occlusal Reduction: The marginal ridge of adjacent teeth will be used as a reference point and a 1.5-2 mm of occlusal reduction will be performed to allow proper crown seating.
3. Bucco-Lingual Reduction: The bucco-lingual wall will be reduced by approximately 1-1.5 mm using a flame-shaped diamond bur.
4. Interproximal Reduction: 1mm of interproximal reduction will be performed using a flame-shaped diamond bur such as a .368 or .330tapered carbide bur.
5. Feather Margin Preparation: Subgingival reduction of 1-2 mm will be done using a flame-shaped diamond bur, creating a feathered margin to achieve a passive fit.
6. Trial Fitting of the Crown: The crown will be tried in to ensure proper adaptation. until the crown fits passively and extends sub gingivally by 1-2 mm wit.
7. Glass ionomer cement will be used for cementation.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Children aged four to eight years old who are appearing healthy and free of any systemic disease according to parental history.
2. Frankl's positive and definitely positive children.
3. Children whose parent or guardian are willing to sign an informed consent.
4. Children whose parent or guardian are willing to comply with follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Children with

1. Children with poor oral hygiene that may contribute to higher plaque levels and affect the clinical outcomes of the crown restorations.
2. Children with history of allergies; Known allergies to dental local anesthesia or to the materials used in Bioflx crowns.
3. Child with parafunctional habits.
4. Molars with severe structural loss that may compromise crown retention.
5. Presence of malocclusion such as crossbite or scissor bite.
6. Primary molar with root caries.
7. Primary molar with root resorption or furcation involvement.

Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

8 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes