Clinical Evaluation of BioFlx Crowns and Preformed Zirconia Crowns on Primary Second Molars
NCT ID: NCT06895707
Last Updated: 2025-03-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-05-31
2027-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Is there a difference between BioFlx crowns (Group A) and one zirconia (Group B) in terms of crown retention (primary outcome)? Is there a difference between BioFlx crowns (Group A) and one zirconia (Group B) in modified gingival index, plaque index, occlusion, surface roughness, stain resistance, wear of opposing tooth, color match, anatomic form, marginal integrity and discoloration, proximal contact, and recurrent caries at the crown margins?
Researchers will compare the clinical performance of Bioflx crowns and zirconia crowns to determine if they are similar.
Participants:
* Participants will be asked to attend two appointments. During the first visit, a BioFlx crown will be placed on the primary lower second molar, and during the second visit, a zirconia crown will be placed on the contralateral primary lower second molar.
* Participants will be recalled and evaluated after 3, 6, and 12 months.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Retention of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars
NCT06856070
Child and Parental Satisfaction of Bioflx Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars
NCT06897020
Occlusal Wear Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars
NCT06890949
Preparation Time Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars
NCT06968767
Comparative Evaluation of Gingival Health and Bacterial Adhesion in Bioflx vs. Zirconia Crowns on Primary Molars
NCT06933927
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Primary lower second molar
one NuSmileĀ® BioFlx crown will be placed on primary lower second molar.
BioFlx crown
NuSmileĀ® BioFlx crown (Group A) will be placed on primary lower second molar.
Contralateral primary lower second molar
one zirconia crown will be placed on the contralateral primary lower second molar.
Zirconia crown
Zirconia crown (Group B) will be placed on the contralateral primary lower second molar.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
BioFlx crown
NuSmileĀ® BioFlx crown (Group A) will be placed on primary lower second molar.
Zirconia crown
Zirconia crown (Group B) will be placed on the contralateral primary lower second molar.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification I or II status.
* Cooperative child.
* Obtained informed consent.
* Two primary lower second molars requiring full coverage restorations.
* Primary lower second molars in functional occlusion with the opposing tooth and have at least one contact area with an adjacent tooth.
* Primary lower second molars that can be adequately isolated.
* Pulptomized primary lower second molars.
* Primary lower second molars with multi-surface caries.
Exclusion Criteria
* Informed consent is not obtained.
* Allergy to local anesthesia.
* Non-restorable primary lower second molars.
5 Years
9 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riyadh Elm University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Fatimah alsuwaiyan
Resident
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FPGRP/2024/822/1146/1065
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.