Atraumatic Versus Silver-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment in Primary Molars

NCT ID: NCT07023939

Last Updated: 2025-06-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

34 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-05-02

Study Completion Date

2024-12-10

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate and compare the short-term effectiveness of two minimally invasive treatments-Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) and Silver-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (SMART)-in managing dentine caries lesions in the primary molars of children aged 3 to 7 years with Early Childhood Caries (ECC). The main questions it aims to answer are:

* Which treatment method (ART or SMART) results in higher clinical success after six months?
* How do ART and SMART treatments affect the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) of the children? The researcher will compare teeth restored using ART with those treated using SMART (which includes the application of silver diamine fluoride before restoration) to see if one approach leads to better restoration outcomes and to assess how these restorations will impact the quality of life.

Participants will:

* Receive both types of treatments in different teeth (split-mouth design).
* Undergo clinical evaluation of the treated teeth at baseline and six months to assess success based on restoration retention, integrity, and absence of secondary caries.
* Have their parents complete a quality-of-life questionnaire (A-ECOHIS) at the start and at the six-month follow-up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aim of the Study in details:

Primary Aim

This study aims to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of Silver-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (SMART) and conventional Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) in the management of carious primary molars in preschool children. This comparison includes:

* Success rate: which include restoration integrity, marginal adaptation, absence of secondary caries, and tooth vitality.
* Retention rate: Determined by monitoring whether the restoration remains fully or partially retained over time
* Caries arrest: where arrested lesions present with hard, darkened surfaces and no progression in lesion size Secondary Aim
* To describe the change in oral health-related quality of life of preschool children before and after placement of ART and SMART restorations Randomization The sample size was specified by using the G\* power test, assuming a statistical level of significance of 95% and power of 80% with normal distribution, and effect size calculated from means and standard deviation of 2 groups obtained from a previous similar study (Jiang et al.,2021). The original sample size was 64 molars and was increased up to 80 to avoid any drop out.

Eligible molars were randomly and equally assigned to either the SMART or ART group using a randomization software (Random.org).

Calibration:

One calibrated examiner was responsible for all the dental examinations. The intra-examiner agreement was assessed by re-examining 10% of the sample. The Kappa statistic for intra-examiner reliability was 0.87 which indicates consistency in the application of scoring criteria over the study period.

Blinding and Outcome Assessment Follow up assessments were done by the operator at 6 months. Complete blinding was not feasible in some cases particularly where GIC restorations where lost due to noticeable staining of the cavity with SDF. However, blinding of the data analyst was done where all study data was labelled with non-identifying Alphabet letters to reduce risk of bias.

Data Collection:

At baseline, parents completed a two-part questionnaire: Part 1 gathered general demographic information, while Part 2 included the validated Arabic version of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (A-ECOHIS) validated by Farsi et al in 2017\[20\]. At the second follow-up visit. parents completed the same questionnaire again.

Statistical Analysis Data were statistically analyzed through SPSS 28 (SPSS IBM statistics, USA). Based on the results of the Shapiro-Wilk test, most of the data were determined to follow a normal distribution. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05. Fishers exact test was used to compare the outcomes between ART and SMART at a single time point. Categorical data like the relation between the success rate of both treatments and the type of the cavity was analyzed by using the Chi-Square Test of Independence. Paired Samples t-Test was used to assess the changes in ECOHIS scores at baseline and after intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Caries Dental Caries in Children

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

split mouth design
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
The data analyst performing statistical evaluations was masked to group allocation during the initial analysis.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ART- Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

Children received Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART), which involved selective caries removal using hand instruments and restoration with high-viscosity glass ionomer cement. Carious dentin was excavated from the axial walls with a spoon excavator, unsupported enamel was removed with a hatchet, and only soft demineralized dentin on the pulpal floor was removed until firm dentin was reached.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ART: Atraumatic restorative treatment, SMART: Silver-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

Intervention Type DRUG

ART Group:

Selective caries removal was done using hand instruments-carious dentin was excavated from the axial walls with a spoon excavator, and unsupported enamel was carefully removed using a hatchet. On the pulpal floor, only soft, completely demineralized dentin was removed until firm dentin was reached.

SMART Group:

the surrounding gingival tissues and lips were protected with petroleum jelly to avoid staining and irritation (2) ) one drop of SDF (Advantage Arrest ™, Elevate Oral Care, USA) was placed into a disposable dish, (4) SDF was applied with a bended micro-sponge directly to the affected tooth surfaces for minimum of 60 seconds, (3) excess was blotted with a cotton pellet, (4)and the area was air-dried while maintaining isolation for up to three minutes.

SMART_Silver-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

Children received Silver-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (SMART), which included the application of 38% silver diamine fluoride (SDF) followed by ART. Gingival tissues and lips were protected with petroleum jelly. One drop of SDF (Advantage Arrest™, Elevate Oral Care, USA) was placed into a disposable dish and applied to affected tooth surfaces using a bent micro-sponge for at least 60 seconds. Excess was blotted with a cotton pellet, and the area was air-dried under isolation for up to three minutes. ART was then completed using high-viscosity glass ionomer cement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

ART: Atraumatic restorative treatment, SMART: Silver-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

Intervention Type DRUG

ART Group:

Selective caries removal was done using hand instruments-carious dentin was excavated from the axial walls with a spoon excavator, and unsupported enamel was carefully removed using a hatchet. On the pulpal floor, only soft, completely demineralized dentin was removed until firm dentin was reached.

SMART Group:

the surrounding gingival tissues and lips were protected with petroleum jelly to avoid staining and irritation (2) ) one drop of SDF (Advantage Arrest ™, Elevate Oral Care, USA) was placed into a disposable dish, (4) SDF was applied with a bended micro-sponge directly to the affected tooth surfaces for minimum of 60 seconds, (3) excess was blotted with a cotton pellet, (4)and the area was air-dried while maintaining isolation for up to three minutes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

ART: Atraumatic restorative treatment, SMART: Silver-Modified Atraumatic Restorative Treatment

ART Group:

Selective caries removal was done using hand instruments-carious dentin was excavated from the axial walls with a spoon excavator, and unsupported enamel was carefully removed using a hatchet. On the pulpal floor, only soft, completely demineralized dentin was removed until firm dentin was reached.

SMART Group:

the surrounding gingival tissues and lips were protected with petroleum jelly to avoid staining and irritation (2) ) one drop of SDF (Advantage Arrest ™, Elevate Oral Care, USA) was placed into a disposable dish, (4) SDF was applied with a bended micro-sponge directly to the affected tooth surfaces for minimum of 60 seconds, (3) excess was blotted with a cotton pellet, (4)and the area was air-dried while maintaining isolation for up to three minutes.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Study Participants: Generally healthy children aged 3 to 7 years
* Behavior Rating (Frankel's Scale):

Negative (Score 2) Positive (Score 3)

* Dental Condition: At least two bilateral asymptomatic decayed primary molars
* Caries Classification: based on International caries detection and assessment systemII I(CDAS II) Scores 4 \& 5 (Occlusal or occluso-proximal carious dentin lesions)

Exclusion Criteria

* Children with systemic diseases/conditions (ASA Type I)
* Behavior Rating (Frankel's Scale) Definitely positive(Score 1) Definitely negative (Score 4).
* Teeth showing irreversible pulpitis or pulpal pathology (abscess, fistula, mobility)
* Teeth with very deep cavities or score 6 based on ICDAS II
Minimum Eligible Age

3 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

7 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beirut Arab University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sana Solh

Clinical Instructor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr.Ahmad Tarabaih, Assoc.Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Beirut Arab university

Dr.Ahmad Holiel, Assis.Prof

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Department of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry, Beirut Arab University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beirut arab University

Beirut, , Lebanon

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Lebanon

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2022-H-011-D-M-0489

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.