Clinical Comparison of Cariclast Gel and Rotary Drilling Technique for Caries Removal in 2d Primary Molars

NCT ID: NCT07270458

Last Updated: 2025-12-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-02-01

Study Completion Date

2026-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomized clinical trial aims to compare two different methods of caries removal in primary molars: the chemomechanical technique using Cariclast gel and the conventional rotary drilling method. The study will evaluate and compare the pain perception, patient acceptance, and operative time associated with both techniques in children aged 5-7years.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Dental caries is one of the most common chronic diseases in children, and the management of carious lesions in primary teeth should be both effective and minimally invasive. Traditional caries removal using rotary instruments is associated with discomfort and anxiety among pediatric patients.

Chemomechanical caries removal (CMCR) agents such as Cariclast have been developed as a more conservative and less traumatic alternative. Cariclast works by softening the infected dentin chemically, allowing its gentle removal without pain or vibration.

This randomized controlled clinical trial will compare Cariclast with the conventional rotary drilling method regarding:

Pain perception assessed using the FLACC scale.

Patient acceptance evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

Operative time required to complete the caries removal procedure.

All procedures will be performed on cooperative children with occlusal caries in primary molars, without pulpal involvement, attending the Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Caries in Primary Molars

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

cariclast group

Participants in this arm will undergo chemomechanical caries removal using Cariclast gel (sodium hypochlorite-based CMCR agent). The gel will be applied on the carious lesion according to the manufacturer's instructions, followed by gentle removal of the softened dentin using hand excavators.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cares removal using cariclast gel

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Chemomechanical caries removal using Cariclast gel applied to soften infected dentin, followed by gentle excavation with hand instruments.

Conventional Mechanical Caries Removal

Participants in this arm will undergo conventional mechanical caries removal using a high-speed rotary handpiece under adequate water cooling. The procedure will follow standard clinical principles for removing infected dentin while maintaining a conservative approach to preserve sound tooth structure in primary molars.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional Mechanical Caries Removal

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional mechanical caries removal performed using a high-speed rotary handpiece under adequate water cooling, following standard clinical principles for primary molars.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

cares removal using cariclast gel

Chemomechanical caries removal using Cariclast gel applied to soften infected dentin, followed by gentle excavation with hand instruments.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Conventional Mechanical Caries Removal

Conventional mechanical caries removal performed using a high-speed rotary handpiece under adequate water cooling, following standard clinical principles for primary molars.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Sodium hypochlorite-based CMCR agent

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children:

1. children aged 4-7 years
2. in good general health, and medically free according to parent history.
3. Cooperative patients
4. Children whom their parents will comply with follow-ups.
5. Children whom their parents who accept to sign informed consent

Tooth:

1. Broad cavitated occlusal lesion with dentinal involvement
2. (Black's Class I cavity) and occlusal access.
3. Radiograph showing dentinal caries up to two-thirds of the dentinal thickness.
4. The consistency of carious lesions ranges from soft to medium hard.
5. Color of carious lesion ranges from light yellow to brown

Exclusion Criteria

* Children:

1. Medically or developmentally compromising conditions
2. Children who will be unable to attend follow-up visits.
3. Children whom their parents refuse to give written formed consent.

Teeth:

1. Cases requiring restorative treatment that is not of the Class I variety.
2. Extensively damaged teeth.
3. Radiograph showing dentinal caries of more than two thirds of the dentinal thickness.
4. Caries involving pulp or extending below the gingiva.
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

7 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Noran Mohamed Kamel Bayoumi

Nora mohamed kamel

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

randa youssef abdelgawad, professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cairo University

rana sobhy saeed

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Cairo University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

noran mohamed kamel, bechelor

Role: CONTACT

011464949811

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gupta N, Marwah N, Nigam A, Vishwanathaiah S, Alessa N, Almeslet A, Alhakami K, Dawood T, Masha FM, Maganur PC. Evaluation of Papacarie(R), Carie-Care, BRIX3000 and conventional hand instrumentation for caries removal in primary teeth: a randomized control study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 May;48(3):131-138. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2024.066. Epub 2024 May 3.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 38755991 (View on PubMed)

Nagaveni, N. B., Radhika, N. B., Satisha, T. S., Ashwini, K. S., Sridhar, N., & Gupta, S. (2016). Efficacy of new chemomechanical caries removal agent compared with conventional method in primary teeth: An in vivo study. International Journal of Oral Health Sciences, 6(2), 52-58. doi: 10.4103/2231-6027.199986

Reference Type RESULT

Cardoso M, Coelho A, Lima R, Amaro I, Paula A, Marto CM, Sousa J, Spagnuolo G, Marques Ferreira M, Carrilho E. Efficacy and Patient's Acceptance of Alternative Methods for Caries Removal-a Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 23;9(11):3407. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113407.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33114249 (View on PubMed)

Al Agili DE. A systematic review of population-based dental caries studies among children in Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J. 2013 Jan;25(1):3-11. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2012.10.002. Epub 2012 Nov 10.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23960549 (View on PubMed)

Chaussain-Miller C, Decup F, Domejean-Orliaguet S, Gillet D, Guigand M, Kaleka R, Laboux O, Lafont J, Medioni E, Serfaty R, Toumelin-Chemla F, Tubiana J, Lasfargues JJ. Clinical evaluation of the Carisolv chemomechanical caries removal technique according to the site/stage concept, a revised caries classification system. Clin Oral Investig. 2003 Mar;7(1):32-7. doi: 10.1007/s00784-003-0196-5. Epub 2003 Feb 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 12673435 (View on PubMed)

Kotb RM, Abdella AA, El Kateb MA, Ahmed AM. Clinical evaluation of Papacarie in primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2009 Winter;34(2):117-23. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.34.2.f312p36g18463716.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20297701 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NK2025-CARICLAST

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Time of Treatment in HALL Technique Vs ART
NCT06594770 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA