Comparative Evaluation of Instrumentation Time Using Pediatric Rotary Versus Hand (Flare) File Systems
NCT ID: NCT05665803
Last Updated: 2022-12-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
23 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-01
2024-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Pulpally affected primary teeth is a common problem in children due to lower mineralization, the presence of large pulp chamber with high pulp horns, and thin layers of enamel and dentin .
Manual files system is usually used for management of pulpally affected primary molars. This system has shown through the past years an acceptable clinical success rate but it also have many problems such as long visit time affecting the child behavior and causing fatigue to the dentist, difficulty in dealing with thin and curved canals due to limited flexibility of manual files causing incomplete removal of pulp tissue, and also difficulty in the determination of the actual working length due to the presence of physiologic and pathologic root resorption.
Rationale for conducting the research:
Pulp therapy in primary molars becomes compromised sometimes after delayed treatment due to dental neglect of children till caries progression to the pulp leading to severe symptoms associated with excessive pulp inflammation, root resorption, or periradicular bone resorption with a less favorable prognosis for conventional endodontic therapy. In the current era, a new perspective which is less time consuming with an acceptable success rate could be a spark of hope for the pediatric patient as well as the dentists.
Many studies were done comparing manual vs pediatric rotary files but without definitive conclusion. So further studies should be done with higher sample size to determine the superiority of one system over the other.
Benefits for the practitioner:
* Providing new and alternative treatment options.
* Shorter instrumentation time.
* Less fatigue.
* Better preparation of the canal.
Benefits for the patient:
* A faster and easier process leading to a more efficient dental procedure which could develop better outcomes in terms of success.
* Improvement in patient as well as parent satisfaction.
Benefits for community:
* Using alternative technique that can be faster, with a better success rate.
* To boost overall oral health.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pediatric rotary files
Biomechanical preparation will be done using pediatric rotary file system (Kedo-SG blue file system). D1 and E1 files will be used at 300 rpm and 2.4 N/cm torque.
Pediatric rotary files
Mechanical preparation of primary tooth canals with pediatric rotary files
Manual flare files
Biomechanical preparation will be done using manual flare files (Mani) No. 15-35.
Manual flare files
Mechanical preparation of primary tooth canals with manual flare files
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Pediatric rotary files
Mechanical preparation of primary tooth canals with pediatric rotary files
Manual flare files
Mechanical preparation of primary tooth canals with manual flare files
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Cooperative children.
* 4-6 years old children.
* Children who will attend follow up.
Teeth:
* Bilateral lower second primary molars.
* Pulpally involved molars indicated for pulpectomy.
Exclusion Criteria
* Children with physical or emotional alteration.
* Children with systemic diseases.
* Children of parents who don't accept to participate in the study.
Teeth:
* Teeth with more than 1/3 of root resorption.
* Teeth with pathological mobility.
* Necrotic teeth with periapical or furcal lesions.
* Non restorable teeth.
4 Years
6 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ahmed Wafik Ismael Mohamed
Assistant lecturer, department of pediatric dentistry
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Manal A Elsayed, Professor
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Cairo University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pediatric rotary files
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id