Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of SMART Technique vs ART in Primary Molars
NCT ID: NCT05438381
Last Updated: 2022-06-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-09-30
2021-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
For this study, a sample size of 30 was obtained using unpaired two sample two tail z-test. The effect size (dz=2.813) and the required sample size were calculated for α =0.05 and a confidence power of 0.8039, assuming a normal distribution.
Patient selection: This study conducted on thirty children aged 3-6 years old of both genders. The children selected from Pediatric Dental Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University. Included children in the study were. Apparent healthy and free from any systemic diseases or chronic conditions. Child should have bilateral restorable carious lower first primary molars, occlusal caries, International Caries Detection and Assessment System(ICDAS) score (4, 5), asymptomatic or have reversible pulpitis. Radiographic examination show intact lamina dura, absence of internal and external pathological root resorption or periapical infection.
Randomization. The study was spilt mouth design. The right side of all participants was done atraumatic restorative technique (ART) and the left side was silver modified atraumatic restorative technique (SMART technique).
Clinical procedures:
* Communication with the children were established.
* Pre-operative periapical x- ray were taken for both sides.
* Gross debris from cavitation were removed.
* Carious dentin on walls were excavated using spoon excavator and low speed contra with round or fissure bur.
* Areas to be treated were isolated with cotton rolls.
* Dryness of lesion with gentle flow of compressed air were done. Control group: Right side of the patient (ART technique) (group 1) (D1) :(20)
* GIC was applied according to manufacturer's instructions.
Experimental group: Left side of the patient (SMART technique) (group 2) (D2):(21)
* A protective coating was applied to the lips and skin to prevent a temporary henna-appearing tattoo that can occur if soft tissues come into contact with SDF.
* SDF was applied carefully using bended micro sponge brush. The brush was dipped into SDF and dabbed on the side of the plastic dish to remove excess liquid before application.
* SDF was applied directly to only the affected tooth surface of lower first primary molar.
* Excess SDF was removed with gauze, cotton roll, or cotton pellet to minimize systemic absorption.
* Application time was at least one minute. No more than one drop of SDF was used for the entire appointment.
* The lesion was dried for 15 seconds with gentle flow of compressed air.
* After one week GIC was applied according to manufacturer's instructions.
Evaluation:
All primary molars were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 6 and 12 months for the overall success/failure criteria:
* Presence/absence of {recurrent caries (catch with probe), pain (spontaneous, with eating, with percussion), clinical abscess, mobility}.
* Presence/absence of {internal root resorption, external root resorption, interradicular radiolucency, periapical radiolucency}.
Statistical Analysis:
The collected data were tabulated and statistically analyzed . The results were considered statistically significant at p≤0.05.
* Chi-Square test was performed to compare the significance between the groups in clinical and radiographic evaluation.
* Kappa index was performed to correlate between clinical and radiographic results.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ART group
Atraumatic restorative technique: excavation of caries then application of Glass ionomer capsule (GC, USA)
Atraumatic Restorative Technique (ART)
Glass ionomer capsule (GC, USA)
SMART group
SMART technique: excavation of caries and application of silver diamine fluoride (SDF 38%) then glass ionomer cement
SMART Technique
silver diamine fluoride (SDF) then glass ionomer cement capsule (GC, USA)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Atraumatic Restorative Technique (ART)
Glass ionomer capsule (GC, USA)
SMART Technique
silver diamine fluoride (SDF) then glass ionomer cement capsule (GC, USA)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* children in the study were. Apparent healthy and free from any systemic diseases or chronic conditions.
* Child should have bilateral restorable carious lower first primary molars, occlusal caries, ICDAS score (4, 5), asymptomatic or have reversible pulpitis.
* Radiographic examination show intact lamina dura, absence of internal and external pathological root resorption or periapical infection.
Exclusion Criteria
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
sahar mohammed, dentist
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mansoura University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University
Al Mansurah, El Gomhoria Street, Mansoura,egypt, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Contreras V, Toro MJ, Elias-Boneta AR, Encarnacion-Burgos A. Effectiveness of silver diamine fluoride in caries prevention and arrest: a systematic literature review. Gen Dent. 2017 May-Jun;65(3):22-29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
A 04030919
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id