Preparation Time Of Bioflx Crowns Compared To Zirconia Crowns On Primary Molars

NCT ID: NCT06968767

Last Updated: 2025-05-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-06-15

Study Completion Date

2026-06-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to evaluate and compare the preparation time required for Bioflx crowns versus zirconia crowns on primary molars through a randomized clinical trial.

• Primary Objective: To compare the preparation time required for Bioflex crowns and zirconia crowns on primary molars in pediatric patients.

• Secondary Objectives:

To evaluate the clinical performance of Bioflex crowns compared to zirconia crowns, including:

Retention, Patient Satisfaction, Parental Satisfaction, Occlusal Wear and Gingival Health.

the main question it aim to answer: Is there a significant difference in the preparation time required for Bioflx crowns compared to zirconia crowns in the primary molars of pediatric patients?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In pediatric dentistry, achieving efficient and aesthetic restoration of primary molars remains a significant challenge, particularly when treating young or anxious patients who may struggle with long or complex procedures. Zirconia crowns are widely used due to their durability, excellent biocompatibility, and natural tooth-like appearance, making them the gold standard for full-coverage aesthetic restorations in children. However, their placement involves extensive tooth preparation, which results in longer chair time and an increased risk of pulp exposure. These factors can negatively impact both treatment outcomes and patient behavior management.

Bioflex crowns have emerged as a potential alternative, offering a more flexible and user-friendly design that simplifies placement and reduces the amount of tooth preparation required. This may result in shorter procedure times and improved patient comfort. Despite these potential benefits, there is currently limited clinical evidence comparing the preparation time and efficiency of Bioflex crowns versus zirconia crowns for restoring primary molars.

This gap in knowledge makes it difficult for clinicians to make fully informed decisions about which crown system offers the best balance of procedural efficiency, aesthetics, and patient cooperation. By directly comparing Bioflex and zirconia crowns in terms of tooth preparation time and overall clinical practicality, the proposed study aims to determine whether Bioflex crowns provide a significant advantage in pediatric settings. The results could help identify the most time-efficient and effective restorative option for primary molars, ultimately improving care outcomes for pediatric patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Carious Primary Molars

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group A performed bioflx crown

(Nu smile, united state) introduced Biofix Crowns and claimed as the first flexible, durable, and esthetic preformed crown for primary molars. Biofix Crowns are monochromatic, metal-free, tooth-colored crowns made up of high-strength resin polymer used in the medical device industry having high strength, flexibility, and durability. These crowns are autoclavable and are like SSC in tooth preparation as claimed by the manufacturer. Their flexibility and snap-fit technology aim to improve retention while minimizing trauma during placement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

bioflx crown

Intervention Type OTHER

(Group A: Preformed Biofix Crown - Assigned Intervention)

Crown Selection \& Tooth Preparation:

Measure the mesiodistal width using calipers to select an appropriately sized crown. If a mesial or distal wall is missing, use the contralateral tooth for size selection. Choose the crown that closely matches the measured mesiodistal width. Select the smallest crown that preserves proximal contacts using a trial-and-error approach. If crimping is necessary, use Howe's pliers.

Perform 1-1.5 mm occlusal reduction using a tapered diamond bur.

Reduce proximal areas by approximately 0.5 mm to clear the contact area.

Crown Placement \& Cementation:

Ensure a snug fit of the selected crown. Apply a thin layer of glass ionomer cement inside the crown. Seat the crown firmly using finger pressure. Have the child bite down gently to ensure proper seating.

Final Adjustments \& Cleanup:

Remove excess cement with floss or an explorer. Verify the crown's fit, occlusion, and stability.

group B performed zirconia crown

NuSmile Zirconia Crowns are prefabricated, esthetic full-coverage restorations designed for primary teeth. Known for their superior strength, durability, and natural tooth-like appearance, these crowns provide an excellent alternative to traditional stainless steel crowns. Made from high-quality medical-grade zirconia, they are biocompatible, resistant to chipping, and highly polished to minimize plaque accumulation and gingival irritation.

NuSmile Zirconia Crowns require significant tooth preparation for proper fit and retention. They are available in various sizes to accommodate different primary molars and anterior teeth. Their lifelike translucency and color-matching capabilities make them a preferred choice for parents and clinicians.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

zirconia crown

Intervention Type OTHER

Group B: Preformed Zirconia Crown - Assigned Intervention)

Crown Selection:

Measure the mesiodistal width using calipers to select the appropriate crown. If a mesial or distal wall is missing, use the contralateral tooth for size selection. Choose the one that closely matches the mesiodistal width. Select the smallest crown that preserves proximal contacts.

Tooth Preparation:

Reduce the occlusal surface by 1.5-2 mm using a tapered diamond bur.

Reduce interproximal areas by 1-1.5 mm, ensuring a feather-edge finish.

Perform a 1-2 mm subgingival preparation in passively placed fissure bur.

Crown Placement \& Passive Fit Check:

Place the selected crown on the prepared tooth.

Cementation of the Crown:

Apply a thin layer of glass ionomer cement inside the crown. Seat the crown with passive finger pressure. Have the child bite down gently to ensure seating.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

bioflx crown

(Group A: Preformed Biofix Crown - Assigned Intervention)

Crown Selection \& Tooth Preparation:

Measure the mesiodistal width using calipers to select an appropriately sized crown. If a mesial or distal wall is missing, use the contralateral tooth for size selection. Choose the crown that closely matches the measured mesiodistal width. Select the smallest crown that preserves proximal contacts using a trial-and-error approach. If crimping is necessary, use Howe's pliers.

Perform 1-1.5 mm occlusal reduction using a tapered diamond bur.

Reduce proximal areas by approximately 0.5 mm to clear the contact area.

Crown Placement \& Cementation:

Ensure a snug fit of the selected crown. Apply a thin layer of glass ionomer cement inside the crown. Seat the crown firmly using finger pressure. Have the child bite down gently to ensure proper seating.

Final Adjustments \& Cleanup:

Remove excess cement with floss or an explorer. Verify the crown's fit, occlusion, and stability.

Intervention Type OTHER

zirconia crown

Group B: Preformed Zirconia Crown - Assigned Intervention)

Crown Selection:

Measure the mesiodistal width using calipers to select the appropriate crown. If a mesial or distal wall is missing, use the contralateral tooth for size selection. Choose the one that closely matches the mesiodistal width. Select the smallest crown that preserves proximal contacts.

Tooth Preparation:

Reduce the occlusal surface by 1.5-2 mm using a tapered diamond bur.

Reduce interproximal areas by 1-1.5 mm, ensuring a feather-edge finish.

Perform a 1-2 mm subgingival preparation in passively placed fissure bur.

Crown Placement \& Passive Fit Check:

Place the selected crown on the prepared tooth.

Cementation of the Crown:

Apply a thin layer of glass ionomer cement inside the crown. Seat the crown with passive finger pressure. Have the child bite down gently to ensure seating.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Children aged between 4 and 8 years with a primary molar that needs to be covered by a crown.

Medically healthy children (ASA I or II according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification).

Children whose parent or guardian is willing to sign an informed consent.

Children whose parent or guardian are willing to comply with follow-up visits.

Frankl's positive and definitely positive patient.

Exclusion Criteria

* Molars with severe structural loss that may compromise crown retention.

Children with poor oral hygiene that may contribute to higher plaque levels and affect the clinical outcomes of the crown restorations.

Children with a history of allergies; known allergies to dental local anesthesia or to the materials used in Biofix crowns.

Children with any systemic conditions or disabilities that may affect their ability to participate in the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

4 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

8 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Halah Mosaed Ali Alshaeri

principle investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hala m Alshaeri, Bachelor of Dental surgery

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cairo university faculty of dentistry

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Dentistry Cairo University

Cairo, Egypt, Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

halah M alshaeri, Bachelor of Dental surgery

Role: CONTACT

00201149038858 ext. 002

Manal A Elshiekh, prof, phd

Role: CONTACT

0223642705 ext. 002

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

faculty of dentistry cairo university

Role: primary

0020223642705

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PT-BFC VS ZRC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.