Custom-Made Zirconia Crowns and 3D-Printed Resin Crowns Versus Ready-Made Zirconia Crowns in Primary Molars

NCT ID: NCT06581510

Last Updated: 2024-09-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-25

Study Completion Date

2026-02-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main problem introduced in this study is the aggressive reduction needed for ready-made zirconia crowns to be passively fitted. In addition, its relatively expensive cost and wear of the opposing tooth structure. In this study, different crown materials will be introduced, such as customized zirconia crowns and novel 3D printed resin crowns who may offer better adaptability and gingival health and are relatively cost effective. The proposed study will help in increasing studies of different crown materials for primary teeth

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

According to AAPD, pulpally treated or deep carious primary teeth should be restored with full coverage crowns for protection of the remaining tooth structure and integrity of occlusion. Different crown materials and compositions have been introduced; however, each with their own drawbacks. Stainless steel crowns have remained the gold standard for restoring primary molars, with the advantages of minimal preparation needed and better adaptability of margins due to their burnishing ability. On the other hand, stainless steel crowns suffer from poor aesthetics and gingival health. The aesthetics of pre-veneered stainless-steel crowns improved but were significantly reduced when the veneered surface was chipped, which was a major drawback in the crown; in addition to their decreased strength and durability in comparison to stainless steel crowns. Strip crowns and polycarbonate crowns were also introduced; however, because of their weak bonding capacity, they have poor strength and an uncertain position in the posterior primary teeth. Due to the increase of aesthetic demand in pediatric dentistry, zirconia crowns have been introduced. Zirconia crowns present the highest aesthetics compared to different pediatric crowns and highest strength compared to all ceramic restorations. However, they need very deep subgingival preparation, poor adaptability because it can't be crimped due to poor burnishing ability and relatively expensive.

Recently, new advances in pediatric crowns have been introduced including computerized 3D printed resin or milled zirconia crowns. Those recent advances have promising results in aesthetics and strength in comparison to ready-made zirconia crowns. Ready-made zirconia crowns have been an exceptionally good biocompatible material. One of the main benefits of those crowns is their durability alongside an outstanding aesthetic appearance. Furthermore, because of their extremely polished surface, ready-made zirconia crowns have proved to have less plaque buildup when compared to other materials. However, because they are costly, need extensive sub-gingival tooth reduction, and cause wear of opposing tooth structure, there are several clinical restrictions and drawbacks.

New computer-aided design digital models serve as the foundation for three-dimensional (3D) printing technologies, which are sophisticated manufacturing techniques that generate customized 3D objects automatically. With applications in almost all fields of dentistry, three-dimensional printing fabricates excellent fitted, accurate, and biocompatible crowns that may overcome ready-made zirconia crowns.

On the other hand, currently the zirconia-based CAD/CAM system has the strongest fracture strength of any all-ceramic material and has continuously produced the most accurate, aesthetically pleasing replication of natural dentition.

They've been acknowledged by patients and dentists alike. The zirconia-based CAD/CAM system is recommended for crowns and bridges in natural teeth, implants, and telescopic dentures. Customized zirconia crowns could be an alternative to the drawbacks presented in ready-made zirconia crowns

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dental Crowns

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Custom-Made Zirconia crowns

CAD/CAM zirconia crown customized for each patient

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

esthetic dental crowns

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Minimal Preparation of esthetic dental crown

3D Printed Resin Crowns

Printed resin crowns customized for each patient

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

esthetic dental crowns

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Minimal Preparation of esthetic dental crown

Ready-Made Zirconia Crowns

Nuu smile ready made zirconia crown

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

control group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Nuu smile ready-made zirconia crown with its well-known reduction

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

esthetic dental crowns

Minimal Preparation of esthetic dental crown

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

control group

Nuu smile ready-made zirconia crown with its well-known reduction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy children within age range of 5-8 years old
* Upper and lower primary second molars
* Vital primary second molars
* Cooperative children Frankl scale 3 (positive) and 4 (definitely positive)

Exclusion Criteria

* Radiographic radiolucency related to the furcation and periapical area or any evidence of root resorption
* Deep bite
* More than 2 walls lost due to caries
* Presence of parafunctional habits
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

8 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

British University In Egypt

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Fatema usama

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

The British university in Egypt

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

The British university in Egypt

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Fatemah usama

Role: CONTACT

+201098781655

Sara Magdy

Role: CONTACT

+201006786219

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Fatemah usama

Role: primary

01098781655

Sara Magdy

Role: backup

01006786219

Noha Kabil, Professor

Role: primary

+201005131500

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Alrashdi M, Ardoin J, Liu JA. Zirconia crowns for children: A systematic review. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2022 Jan;32(1):66-81. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12793. Epub 2021 Apr 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 33772904 (View on PubMed)

Alzanbaqi SD, Alogaiel RM, Alasmari MA, Al Essa AM, Khogeer LN, Alanazi BS, Hawsah ES, Shaikh AM, Ibrahim MS. Zirconia Crowns for Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 28;19(5):2838. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052838.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35270531 (View on PubMed)

Jain S, Sayed ME, Shetty M, Alqahtani SM, Al Wadei MHD, Gupta SG, Othman AAA, Alshehri AH, Alqarni H, Mobarki AH, Motlaq K, Bakmani HF, Zain AA, Hakami AJ, Sheayria MF. Physical and Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Provisional Crowns and Fixed Dental Prosthesis Resins Compared to CAD/CAM Milled and Conventional Provisional Resins: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Polymers (Basel). 2022 Jun 30;14(13):2691. doi: 10.3390/polym14132691.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35808735 (View on PubMed)

Dewan H. Clinical Effectiveness of 3D-Milled and 3D-Printed Zirconia Prosthesis-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Aug 27;8(5):394. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8050394.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37754145 (View on PubMed)

Sztyler K, Wiglusz RJ, Dobrzynski M. Review on Preformed Crowns in Pediatric Dentistry-The Composition and Application. Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 11;15(6):2081. doi: 10.3390/ma15062081.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 35329535 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

24-010

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.