Effect of Modeling Resin on Anterior Direct Composite Veneer
NCT ID: NCT06485024
Last Updated: 2024-07-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-07-31
2025-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Assessment of Indirect Restoration Fabricated From Nano Hybrid Composite Blocks Versus Ceramic Blocks in Badly Broken Teeth One Year Follow up
NCT04563624
Clinical Assessment of Injectable Composite Versus Packable Composite in Treatment of Carious Primary Anterior Teeth
NCT06991582
Clinical Performance of Two Different Resin-Matrix Ceramic Restorations
NCT07265609
Clinical Performance and Wear Resistance of Two Nano Ceramic Resin Composite in Class I Cavities
NCT04738604
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Resin Composites Versus Caries Control Technique in Management of Class I Carious Cavities in High Caries Risk Patients: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06797843
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The research will employ a randomized controlled trial design with a two-arm parallel approach. Adult patients (18-45 years) with anterior tooth defects suitable for composite veneer restoration will be recruited. The intervention group will receive nanohybrid resin composite with modeling resin, while the comparator group will receive the composite without modeling resin. Outcomes will be assessed using modified USPHS criteria, including color stability, color match, anatomical form, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, retention rate, presence of secondary caries, and postoperative sensitivity, at baseline and at follow-up intervals of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Statistical analysis will involve independent t-tests for intergroup comparisons and repeated measures ANOVA for intragroup comparisons, with a significance level set at 0.05. The study aims to determine if the use of modeling resin influences the clinical outcomes of resin composite veneer restorations. Ethics approval will be obtained, and confidentiality of participant data will be strictly maintained throughout the study period.
Overall, this research seeks to provide insights into optimizing the application of resin composites in dental practice to enhance patient outcomes and satisfaction
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
intervention
the use of Modeling resin as the last layer applied to the NanoHybrid composite direct veneer
Modeling Resin
it is the application of Modeling liquid to make easier manipulation and sculpting the composite veneer and reflect on its physical properties and clinical performance
comparator
the regular application of the NanoHybrid composite as a direct anterior veneer restoration
Modeling Resin
it is the application of Modeling liquid to make easier manipulation and sculpting the composite veneer and reflect on its physical properties and clinical performance
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Modeling Resin
it is the application of Modeling liquid to make easier manipulation and sculpting the composite veneer and reflect on its physical properties and clinical performance
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Males or females.
* Community-dwelling
* Have all his/her anterior teeth with sufficient enamel structure
* With ≥ 1 anterior tooth defect
* Have sufficient cognitive ability to understand consent procedures
* Anterior tooth defect indicated for direct composite veneer
* Vital upper or lower anterior teeth with no signs or symptoms of irreversible pulpitis.
* Mobility grade: no clinical mobility
* Plaque index ≤ 2
Exclusion Criteria
* Systemic diseases or severe medically compromised.
* Lack of compliance.
* Evidence of severe bruxism, clenching or temporomandibular joint disorders.
* Cognitive impairment
Periapical pathosis or signs of pulpal pathology.
* Malocclusion
* Possible prosthodontic restoration within 1 year.
* Non-vital tooth.
* Endodontically treated tooth.
* Severe periodontal affection or tooth indicated for extraction.
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sarah Azzazy ali
Master's student
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Munchow EA, Sedrez-Porto JA, Piva E, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS. Use of dental adhesives as modeler liquid of resin composites. Dent Mater. 2016 Apr;32(4):570-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
Stefanski S, van Dijken JW. Clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite with and without an intermediary layer of flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Feb;16(1):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0485-8. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
Rosentritt M, Esch J, Behr M, Leibrock A, Handel G. In vivo color stability of resin composite veneers and acrylic resin teeth in removable partial dentures. Quintessence Int. 1998 Aug;29(8):517-22.
Al-Asmar AA, Ha Sabrah A, Abd-Raheam IM, Ismail NH, Oweis YG. Clinical evaluation of reasons for replacement of amalgam vs composite posterior restorations. Saudi Dent J. 2023 Mar;35(3):275-281. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Mar 4.
Bhadra D, Shah NC, Kishan KV, Dedania MS. An in vitro comparative evaluation of commonly consumed catechu and catechu with lime on surface roughness and color stability of the conventional nano-hybrid composite. J Conserv Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;22(1):87-91. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_181_18.
Crins LAMJ, Opdam NJM, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Sterenborg BAMM, Huysmans MCDNJM, Loomans BAC. Randomized controlled trial on the performance of direct and indirect composite restorations in patients with severe tooth wear. Dent Mater. 2021 Nov;37(11):1645-1654. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.018. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
Demarco FF, Collares K, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing? Braz Oral Res. 2017 Aug 28;31(suppl 1):e56. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0056.
Cortopassi LS, Shimokawa CAK, Willers AE, Sobral MAP. Surface roughness and color stability of surface sealants and adhesive systems applied over a resin-based composite. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Jan;32(1):64-72. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12548. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
Malekipour MR, Sharafi A, Kazemi S, Khazaei S, Shirani F. Comparison of color stability of a composite resin in different color media. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Jul;9(4):441-6.
Gianordoli-Neto R, Padovani GC, Mondelli J, de Lima Navarro MF, Mendonca JS, Santiago SL. Two-year clinical evaluation of resin composite in posterior teeth: A randomized controlled study. J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(4):306-10. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.186446.
Heintze SD, Rousson V, Hickel R. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations--a meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2015 May;31(5):481-95. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
Maia TS, Lima TD, Ramos VM, Faria-E-Silva AL, Menezes MS. Effect of modeling liquids on resin composite roughness and color parameters after staining and toothbrushing. Braz Oral Res. 2023 Mar 31;37:e024. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0024. eCollection 2023.
Paolone G, Mazzitelli C, Josic U, Scotti N, Gherlone E, Cantatore G, Breschi L. Modeling Liquids and Resin-Based Dental Composite Materials-A Scoping Review. Materials (Basel). 2022 May 24;15(11):3759. doi: 10.3390/ma15113759.
Pizzolotto L, Moraes RR. Resin Composites in Posterior Teeth: Clinical Performance and Direct Restorative Techniques. Dent J (Basel). 2022 Nov 27;10(12):222. doi: 10.3390/dj10120222.
Cetin AR, Unlu N. One-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. Dent Mater J. 2009 Sep;28(5):620-6. doi: 10.4012/dmj.28.620.
Sedrez-Porto JA, Munchow EA, Brondani LP, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Effects of modeling liquid/resin and polishing on the color change of resin composite. Braz Oral Res. 2016 Aug 18;30(1):S1806-83242016000100275. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0088.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MR in anterior
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.