Comparison of the Functional Properties of Two Injectable Materials in Posterior Teeth: Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT ID: NCT06894186
Last Updated: 2025-03-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2025-03-31
2026-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations
NCT03608306
Clinical Performance of an Alkasite-based Restorative Material
NCT06317857
Aesthetic Performance of Two Injectable Resin Composites in Class V Cavities: A Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT06950762
Three-Year Clinical Performance of Fiber-reinforced Versus Indirect Resin Composite Posterior Restorations
NCT06803537
Clinical Performance of Short Fiber Reinforced Flowable Resin Composite Restorations 2y RCT
NCT04720638
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
beautiful flow plus x
shofu's beauitifil flow plus x is advanced bioactive material with the adaptability of flowable composite and mechanical properities of hybird composite
Gaenial universal injectable
GC Gaenial universal injectable advanced injectable composite with nano sized filler that merge the adaptation of flowable composite and mechanical properties of hybird composite
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Gaenial universal injectable
GC Gaenial universal injectable advanced injectable composite with nano sized filler that merge the adaptation of flowable composite and mechanical properties of hybird composite
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
21 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Future University in Egypt
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nourhan elsayed
Principal investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hancer Sarica S, Arslan S, Balkaya H. Comparison of the 2-year clinical performances of class II restorations using different restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2025 Feb 13;29(2):128. doi: 10.1007/s00784-025-06207-6.
Elderiny HM, Khallaf YS, Akah MM, Hassanein OE. Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite vs Conventional Nanohybrid Composite in Posterior Restorations: An 18-Month Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2024 Aug 1;25(8):794-802. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3737.
Rajabi H, Denny M, Karagiannopoulos K, Petridis H. Comparison of Flexural Strength and Wear of Injectable, Flowable and Paste Composite Resins. Materials (Basel). 2024 Sep 27;17(19):4749. doi: 10.3390/ma17194749.
Neto CCL, das Neves AM, Arantes DC, Sa TCM, Yamauti M, de Magalhaes CS, Abreu LG, Moreira AN. Evaluation of the clinical performance of GIOMERs and comparison with other conventional restorative materials in permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Dent. 2022 Aug 1. doi: 10.1038/s41432-022-0281-8. Online ahead of print.
Ozer F, Patel R, Yip J, Yakymiv O, Saleh N, Blatz MB. Five-year clinical performance of two fluoride-releasing giomer resin materials in occlusal restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Dec;34(8):1213-1220. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12948. Epub 2022 Aug 7.
Deepika U, Sahoo PK, Dash JK, Baliarsingh RR, Ray P, Sharma G. Clinical evaluation of bioactive resin-modified glass ionomer and giomer in restoring primary molars: A randomized, parallel-group, and split-mouth controlled clinical study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2022 Jul-Sep;40(3):288-296. doi: 10.4103/jisppd.jisppd_139_22.
2022. Flowable GIOMER Vs Conventional Flowable Composite For Retention And Prevention Of Caries Recurrence When Used As Sealants For Initially Demineralized Fissures. A Randomized Clinical Trial. Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results. (Nov. 2022), 3257 3263
Badr C, Spagnuolo G, Amenta F, Khairallah C, Mahdi SS, Daher E, Battineni G, Baba NZ, Zogheib T, Qasim SSB, Daher T, Chintalapudi N, Zogheib CM. A Two-Year Comparative Evaluation of Clinical Performance of a Nanohybrid Composite Resin to a Flowable Composite Resin. J Funct Biomater. 2021 Sep 9;12(3):51. doi: 10.3390/jfb12030051.
Kitasako Y, Sadr A, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Thirty-six month clinical evaluation of a highly filled flowable composite for direct posterior restorations. Aust Dent J. 2016 Sep;61(3):366-73. doi: 10.1111/adj.12387.
Kramer N, Reinelt C, Frankenberger R. Ten-year Clinical Performance of Posterior Resin Composite Restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2015 Aug;17(5):433-41. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a35010.
Bayraktar Y, Ercan E, Hamidi MM, Colak H. One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017 May;8(2). doi: 10.1111/jicd.12210. Epub 2016 Jan 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Restoring class II cavities
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.