Clinical Evaluation of SI-R21204 Versus Nano-hybrid Resin Composite: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT02823769

Last Updated: 2024-02-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2020-08-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Despite the advances in adhesive restorative techniques and materials, dental caries still remains a critical concern even today. In addition, recurrent caries related to microleakage is a common mode of failure of directly placed resin composite restorations. Resin composites are particularly susceptible to recurrent caries due to polymerization contraction and also imperfect adhesion of restorative to tooth tissue. Thus, strong durable bond between adhesive restoratives and tooth tissue and increasing the resistance of teeth to acid by encouraging the development of remineralization are essential to withstand secondary caries. Fluoride has been documented as a major contributing factor for the decline in the incidence of dental caries and also it has been accepted as an agent in the prevention of caries. Giomers are a new group of anhydrous resin based direct adhesive restorative materials based on the filler technology (PRG) have both advantages of glass ionomers namely, fluoride release and recharge, and resin composites with excellent optical and mechanical properties. The chemistry of Giomer materials facilitates fluoride ion release with the potential for a lower incidence of recurrent caries that was accepted as a major factor to retreat a resin restoration. Limited number of studies is available on their fluoride release, and polishability, as well as clinical survival.

The objective of this controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical performance of restorative material "SI-R21204 resin composite" versus a "nano-hybrid resin com-posite" materials for Class I and Class II cavities that needs to be restored in per-manent teeth.40 patients are recruited to the project which is carried out at the School of dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Turkey.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of this controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical performance of restorative material "SI-R21204 resin composite" versus a "nano-hybrid resin com-posite" materials for Class I and Class II cavities that needs to be restored in per-manent teeth. Giomers are a new group of anhydrous resin based direct adhesive restorative materials based on the filler technology (PRG) to form a stable phase of glass ionomer in the restorative. These materials have both advantages of glass ionomers namely, fluoride release and recharge, and resin composites with excellent optical and mechanical properties. PRG fillers are fabricated by acid-base reaction of glass particles and polyacrylic acid in the presence of water and forms wet silicous hydrogel. S-PRG filler particles exhibit a three-layer structure where the glass core is enveloped by a stable glass-ionomer hydrogel. This hydrogel is surrounded by the "reforming phase," which provides structural protection for the hydrogel. These materials with S-PRG technology therefore, differ from polyacid modified composite resins because the glass ionomer hydrogel forms only after water uptake by the compomer resin matrix after polymerization. The chemistry of Giomer materials facilitates fluoride ion release with the potential for a lower incidence of recurrent caries that was accepted as a major factor to retreat a resin restoration. Limited number of studies is available on their fluoride release, and polishability, as well as clinical survival. The study will be carried out as a prospective study, with assessment of the restorationsafter three year.

The project includes 40 patients. Most of the patients have been recruited from the Istanbul Medipol University Dental Clinics in Istanbul. After giving their consent to take part in the study Class I \& II restorations of both upper and lower molars and premolars are performed.The treatment procedure is: The patients are offered local anesthetic before treatment start. The cavity is excavated and filled according to the guidelines for composite restorations.

The control procedure is:

The restoration is evaluated according to marginal adaptation, cavo surface marginal discoloration, approximal contact, fractures, caries associated with restorations and postoperative hypersensitivity. The controls will take place after two weeks, one year, two years and three years.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Caries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SI-R21204 resin composite

Fillings made with a new dental filling material

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SI-R21204 resin composite

Intervention Type DEVICE

Primary caries of posterior teeth will be restored using SI-R21204 resin composite. Procedures will be done under local anesthesia if necessary. The preperation and restoration of the tooth will be done according to to the guidelines for ordinary restorative techniques.

Nanohybrid resin composite

Fillings made with nanohybrid resin composite (Clearfil Majesty)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Nanohybrid resin composite

Intervention Type DEVICE

One of the cavities will be restored with a nanohybrid resin composite (Clearfil Majesty) as a control restoration wth ordinary restorative techniques.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SI-R21204 resin composite

Primary caries of posterior teeth will be restored using SI-R21204 resin composite. Procedures will be done under local anesthesia if necessary. The preperation and restoration of the tooth will be done according to to the guidelines for ordinary restorative techniques.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Nanohybrid resin composite

One of the cavities will be restored with a nanohybrid resin composite (Clearfil Majesty) as a control restoration wth ordinary restorative techniques.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Primary caries removal
* Class I \& II restorations
* No obvious untreated caries, dental health problems (regularly checked by a dentist)
* Good or moderate oral hygiene (plaque score of less than 30% in anterior region before treatment)
* No untreated periodontal disease (only DPSI 1, 2)
* Subjects had to present no active carious lesions
* Subjects had to be over the age of 18, be classified according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) as ASA I or ASA II, present with good oral hy-giene, and be free of periodontal disease (probing depth and attachment levels within normal limits, no furcation involvement, and no mobility)
* Subjects had to agree to keep the scheduled recall appointments for data collec-tion and maintenance and plan to stay in the area for at least 3 years.

Exclusion Criteria

* Composite or amalgam removal
* Caries extends cemento-enamel junction in Class II.
* Considerable horizontal and/or vertical mobility of teeth: tooth mobility index score 2 or 3
* Considerable periodontal disease without treatment (DPSI 3-, 3+ and 4)
* Endodontic treatment with extensive loss of tooth tissue
* Patients who still want to bleach their teeth or bleached teeth less than 3 weeks ago
* Excluding the teeth, with opposing natural dentition (either intact or restored with intracoronal or extracoronal fixed restorations), and with a minimum of 20 teeth
* Subjects who presented with severe wear facets and/or reported parafunctional activities such as clenching or nocturnal bruxism
* Subjects who were restored with a removable partial dental prosthesis (RPDP), unless the RPDP replaced the tooth that was planned to be restored in the study
* Subjects who were pregnant pregnant during the duration of the study
* Subjects who are known to be allergic to the ingredients of resin materials
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Shofu Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Istanbul Medipol University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Funda Ozturk Bozkurt

Prof.Dr.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emir Yuzbasioglu, DDS,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medipol University

Mutlu Özcan, DDS,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Zurich

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istanbul Medipol University School of Dentistry

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Toz-Akalin T, Ozturk-Bozkurt F, Kusdemir M, Ozsoy A, Yuzbasioglu E, Ozcan M. Three-year clinical performance of direct restorations using low-shrinkage Giomer vs. nano-hybrid resin composite. Front Dent Med. 2024 Oct 9;5:1459473. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2024.1459473. eCollection 2024.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39917677 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3215

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Clinical Comparison of Restorative Materials
NCT06637605 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING