Clinical Evaluation of SI-R21204 Versus Nano-hybrid Resin Composite: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial
NCT ID: NCT02823769
Last Updated: 2024-02-21
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-01-31
2020-08-16
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The objective of this controlled clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical performance of restorative material "SI-R21204 resin composite" versus a "nano-hybrid resin com-posite" materials for Class I and Class II cavities that needs to be restored in per-manent teeth.40 patients are recruited to the project which is carried out at the School of dentistry, Istanbul Medipol University, Turkey.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Performance of Resin-modified Glass Ionomer and Composite Restorations in Permanent Teeth
NCT05583682
Clinical Comparison of Composite Materials
NCT06058026
Evaluation of Marginal Integrity of Hydroxyapatite Nano-Fiber Reinforced Flowable Composite Versus Conventional Resin-Based Flowable Composite in Initially Demineralized Pits and Fissure: A One Year, Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT03242291
Restoration Repairs Using Composite Resin Versus Glass Ionomer in Primary Molars: a Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT04491981
Performance of GIOMER Based Resin Composite
NCT06021028
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The project includes 40 patients. Most of the patients have been recruited from the Istanbul Medipol University Dental Clinics in Istanbul. After giving their consent to take part in the study Class I \& II restorations of both upper and lower molars and premolars are performed.The treatment procedure is: The patients are offered local anesthetic before treatment start. The cavity is excavated and filled according to the guidelines for composite restorations.
The control procedure is:
The restoration is evaluated according to marginal adaptation, cavo surface marginal discoloration, approximal contact, fractures, caries associated with restorations and postoperative hypersensitivity. The controls will take place after two weeks, one year, two years and three years.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SI-R21204 resin composite
Fillings made with a new dental filling material
SI-R21204 resin composite
Primary caries of posterior teeth will be restored using SI-R21204 resin composite. Procedures will be done under local anesthesia if necessary. The preperation and restoration of the tooth will be done according to to the guidelines for ordinary restorative techniques.
Nanohybrid resin composite
Fillings made with nanohybrid resin composite (Clearfil Majesty)
Nanohybrid resin composite
One of the cavities will be restored with a nanohybrid resin composite (Clearfil Majesty) as a control restoration wth ordinary restorative techniques.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SI-R21204 resin composite
Primary caries of posterior teeth will be restored using SI-R21204 resin composite. Procedures will be done under local anesthesia if necessary. The preperation and restoration of the tooth will be done according to to the guidelines for ordinary restorative techniques.
Nanohybrid resin composite
One of the cavities will be restored with a nanohybrid resin composite (Clearfil Majesty) as a control restoration wth ordinary restorative techniques.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Class I \& II restorations
* No obvious untreated caries, dental health problems (regularly checked by a dentist)
* Good or moderate oral hygiene (plaque score of less than 30% in anterior region before treatment)
* No untreated periodontal disease (only DPSI 1, 2)
* Subjects had to present no active carious lesions
* Subjects had to be over the age of 18, be classified according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) as ASA I or ASA II, present with good oral hy-giene, and be free of periodontal disease (probing depth and attachment levels within normal limits, no furcation involvement, and no mobility)
* Subjects had to agree to keep the scheduled recall appointments for data collec-tion and maintenance and plan to stay in the area for at least 3 years.
Exclusion Criteria
* Caries extends cemento-enamel junction in Class II.
* Considerable horizontal and/or vertical mobility of teeth: tooth mobility index score 2 or 3
* Considerable periodontal disease without treatment (DPSI 3-, 3+ and 4)
* Endodontic treatment with extensive loss of tooth tissue
* Patients who still want to bleach their teeth or bleached teeth less than 3 weeks ago
* Excluding the teeth, with opposing natural dentition (either intact or restored with intracoronal or extracoronal fixed restorations), and with a minimum of 20 teeth
* Subjects who presented with severe wear facets and/or reported parafunctional activities such as clenching or nocturnal bruxism
* Subjects who were restored with a removable partial dental prosthesis (RPDP), unless the RPDP replaced the tooth that was planned to be restored in the study
* Subjects who were pregnant pregnant during the duration of the study
* Subjects who are known to be allergic to the ingredients of resin materials
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shofu Inc.
INDUSTRY
Istanbul Medipol University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Funda Ozturk Bozkurt
Prof.Dr.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Emir Yuzbasioglu, DDS,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medipol University
Mutlu Özcan, DDS,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Zurich
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Istanbul Medipol University School of Dentistry
Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Toz-Akalin T, Ozturk-Bozkurt F, Kusdemir M, Ozsoy A, Yuzbasioglu E, Ozcan M. Three-year clinical performance of direct restorations using low-shrinkage Giomer vs. nano-hybrid resin composite. Front Dent Med. 2024 Oct 9;5:1459473. doi: 10.3389/fdmed.2024.1459473. eCollection 2024.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
3215
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.