Comparison of 2 Different Resin Based Filling Materials in Posterior Teeth - a Multicenter Study

NCT ID: NCT01925040

Last Updated: 2024-10-28

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-06-30

Study Completion Date

2022-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical performance of a new resin based filling material to an established resin-based filling material in posterior teeth at 2 different study centers.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of this study is to compare the performance of the composite resin Venus Pearl and a commercially available control composite material for the restoration of class II-cavities. Primary endpoints of the study are a mean score for each patient calculated from aesthetic, functional attribute and biological parameters. Secondary endpoints are the evaluation of secondary caries, plaque accumulation and gingival reactions and the comparison of the primary score at week 1, month 6, month 12 and month 24 after restoration. Beside this, the single components of the three categories of the primary endpoints will be compared. The study will be executed as a multi-center (Oregon Health \& Science University, Portland, OR, USA and Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany), single-blinded and randomized clinical investigation. 90 comparable cavities per study site will be treated (45 cavities for each material at each site).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Caries Unsatisfactory or Defective Restoration of Tooth

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Venus Pearl

Placement of restoration using Venus Pearl in carious teeth or as a replacement of a defective previous restoration.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Placement of restoration

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placement of restorations

control resin-based filling material

Placement of restoration using a control resin-based filling material in carious teeth or as a replacement of a defective previous restoration.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Placement of restoration

Intervention Type DEVICE

Placement of restorations

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Placement of restoration

Placement of restorations

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients should be 18 years and older.
* Study teeth should have an interproximal (Class II) carious lesion or an existing defective class II restoration requiring restorative therapy on premolars or molars.
* The maximum cavity depth determined by the radiograph will be D2 (Tyas classification).
* The teeth included in the study need to have a proximal contact with the adjacent tooth and be in occlusion with the opposing dentition.
* The teeth included in the study should be vital with no signs of pulpal pathology.
* Patients that report brushing regularly without severe gingival inflammation and/or extensive caries.
* Patients should have no allergies or systemic diseases which inhibit the treatment.
* Patients should have voluntary participation and sign a written informed consent form.
* Patients should be willing to participate in the recall/re-examination appointments.

Exclusion Criteria

* Simultaneous participation in another study about dental restorative materials.
* Written informed consent form not signed.
* Nonvital pulp / periapical lesion.
* Insufficient oral hygiene despite detailed instructions.
* Pregnancy/ breast feeding before placement of the study restoration.
* Minors.
* Severe malocclusion/ malalignment/ traumatic occlusion/ bruxism.
* Known allergy to any components present in any of the materials that are used for this study.
* Unclear mucosal alterations, e.g. oral lichenoid reactions/lesions.
* Severe medical complications (organ transplants, cancer, immune-compromised, long-term antibiotic or steroid therapy).
* Infectious diseases such as HIV/Aids, Hepatitis, etc.
* Application of bleaching products less than 14 days before placement of the restoration.
* Orthodontic treatment during the study.
* Xerostomia.
* Untreated periodontal diseases.
* Rampant or extensive caries present.
* Systemic diseases with potential oral manifestation.
* Sufficient isolation according to the criteria of adhesive techniques not possible, e.g. application of rubber dam.
* Direct adhesive restoration not indicated.
* Replacement of more than one cusp indicated.
* Dental fears patients.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Heraeus Kulzer GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Werner Geurtsen, Prof. Dr.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hannover Medical School

Gabriela Ibarra, DDS, MPH, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oregon Health and Science University

Werner Geurtsen, Prof. Dr.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical School Hannover

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Oregon Health and Science University-School of Dentistry

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Medical School Hannover

Hanover, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Germany

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

HKG-DT-01/2011-SOCO-CLIN

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.