Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Restorative Materials

NCT ID: NCT06109987

Last Updated: 2024-04-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

160 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-11

Study Completion Date

2023-09-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

High-viscosity glass ionomer cements have been developed to improve the weak mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements, increase wear resistance and improve their limited indications. There are limited clinical studies on the use of high-viscosity glass ionomer cements in areas with large cavities bearing stress. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical performance of two different high-viscosity glass ionomer cements with a bulk-fill resin composite in different cavities.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study was a double-blind (evaluator and patient) randomized controlled clinical study with three study groups with an equal allocation. Three different restorative materials were compared in Class I, II, and V restorations.

The treated patients were called back for controls after one week, six months, and eighteen months. Restorations were evaluated clinically according to modified FDI criteria. In terms of marginal discoloration, fracture and retention, marginal adaptation, post-operative sensitivity, secondary caries, color match and difference criteria were examined.

Clinical evaluation was performed by one qualified clinicians using a mirror and probe under reflector light. Bite-wing radiographs were taken from the patients who were called for controls at 6-moth and 18-month to evaluate the formation of secondary caries.

Differences between adhesives at each time period were evaluated using Fisher's Exact test. The effect of time on restorations was evaluated using Wilcoxon Signed rank test (p \< 0.05).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Caries; Dentin

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

World Dental Federation criteria (FDI)

Restorations were evaluated with FDI criteria.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Voluntarily agreed to participate in the study after being informed about the study.
* Volunteer must not be under 18 years of age
* No systemic disease
* Having healthy oral hygiene
* As a result of clinical and radiographic examination, there is a carious lesion at D1 and D2 levels according to the caries classification method.
* The tooth to be restored is vital

Exclusion Criteria

* Refusal to participate in the study after being informed about the study
* The patient has a history of teeth grinding
* Volunteer must be under 18 years of age
* The volunteer is undergoing or will begin orthodontic treatment
* The volunteer has a serious systemic disease
* The tooth to be restored has endodontic and periodontal problems
* Volunteer's pregnancy status
* Extraction of one of the teeth opposite or in contact with the tooth to be restored
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Muhammet Karadaş

Assistan Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Muhammet 53 Karadaş, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Recep Tayyip Erdogan University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Muhammet Karadaş

Rize, Merkez, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RTEUDHFMKARADAS002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Clinical Evaluation of a Bioactive Material
NCT04825379 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
Clinical Performance of Different Resin Cements
NCT04694690 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA