Clinical Performance of Zirconia Reinforced GI Versus Conventional Viscous GI in Geriatric Patients
NCT ID: NCT04298151
Last Updated: 2024-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
28 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-09-01
2022-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Evaluation of Glass Ionomer With Glass Hybrid Technology Versus Conventional High Viscosity Glass Ionomer in Class I Cavities of High Caries Risk Patients
NCT02856932
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Reinforced Glass Ionomer Restorations
NCT04288791
Evaluation of the Clinical Performance of Bioactive Giomer Restoration in Class II Cavities After One Year
NCT06603116
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Zirconomer Restorative
NCT06254053
Assessment of Bioactive Bulk Fill Composite Versus High Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations for Carious Lesions
NCT05332041
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
P: Geriatric Patients with posterior Caries lesions I: Zirconia reinforced GI (Zirconomer Improved) C: Conventional viscous GI, (Ketac Molar quick Aplicap) O: The Clinical performance of the Glass Ionomer restorations Using USPHS Criteria
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
zirconomer improved
zirconia reinforced glass ionomer restoration
Zirconomer Improved
glass ionomer restoration reinforced with nano-zirconia particles to improve strength and esthetics
ketac molar quick aplicap
conventional viscous glass ionomer restoration
Ketac Molar quick Aplicap
highly viscous glass ionomer with improved mechanical properties than the conventional GI
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Zirconomer Improved
glass ionomer restoration reinforced with nano-zirconia particles to improve strength and esthetics
Ketac Molar quick Aplicap
highly viscous glass ionomer with improved mechanical properties than the conventional GI
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Geriatric patients with Class I or II Posterior carious lesions.
* Males or Females.
* Pulp asymptomatic vital carious posterior teeth.
* Co-operative patients approving to participate in the trial.
Exclusion Criteria
* Disabilities.
* Deep extensive carious cavities that may lead to fracture of the tooth or pulpal affection.
* Teeth with signs and symptoms of irreversible pulpitis or pulp necrosis.
* Heavy smoking.
* Lack of compliance.
60 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Doaa Mohammed Mohammed Abdou
Assistant lecturer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Doaa Abdou
Giza, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Klinke T, Daboul A, Turek A, Frankenberger R, Hickel R, Biffar R. Clinical performance during 48 months of two current glass ionomer restorative systems with coatings: a randomized clinical trial in the field. Trials. 2016 May 8;17(1):239. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1339-8.
Walia R, Jasuja P, Verma KG, Juneja S, Mathur A, Ahuja L. A comparative evaluation of microleakage and compressive strength of Ketac Molar, Giomer, Zirconomer, and Ceram-x: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016 Jul-Sep;34(3):280-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.186746.
Albeshti R, Shahid S. Evaluation of Microleakage in Zirconomer(R): A Zirconia Reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2018 Jun;52(2):97-104. doi: 10.15644/asc52/2/2.
de Franca Lopes CMC, Schubert EW, Martins AS, Loguercio AD, Reis A, Chibinski ACR, Wambier DS. Randomized Clinical Trial of ART Class II Restorations Using Two Glass Ionomer Cements: One-Year Follow-Up. Pediatr Dent. 2018 Mar 15;40(2):98-104.
Friedl K, Hiller KA, Friedl KH. Clinical performance of a new glass ionomer based restoration system: a retrospective cohort study. Dent Mater. 2011 Oct;27(10):1031-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2011.07.004. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Zirconia GI Conventional GI
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.