Retrospective Evaluation of Posterior Direct Restorations
NCT ID: NCT04827823
Last Updated: 2021-04-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
80 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-05-10
2017-12-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Evaluation of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
NCT04293770
Clinical Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Composites
NCT06667271
Retrospective Evaluation of RMGI/GI Class V Restorations
NCT04401618
Postoperative Pulpal Complications in Posterior Resin Composite Restorations Without Glass-ionomer Cement Lining
NCT01567514
Clinical Performance of Posterior Indirect Adhesive Restorations
NCT04838483
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1- Amalgam restorations
Multi-surface amalgam restorations performed by dental students and are in function for about 5 years.
Retrospective evaluation of amalgam and composite restorations
Multi-surface restorations that were performed by dental students and that are in function for the last five years will be clinically evaluated with mirrors and probes according to the modified USPHS criteria.
Group 2- Composite restorations
Multi-surface composite restorations performed by dental students and are in function for about 5 years.
Retrospective evaluation of amalgam and composite restorations
Multi-surface restorations that were performed by dental students and that are in function for the last five years will be clinically evaluated with mirrors and probes according to the modified USPHS criteria.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Retrospective evaluation of amalgam and composite restorations
Multi-surface restorations that were performed by dental students and that are in function for the last five years will be clinically evaluated with mirrors and probes according to the modified USPHS criteria.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Restorations performed before or after five years on the time of evaluation
* Restorations with fewer than 3 surfaces
25 Years
85 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Western University, Canada
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Schulich Medicine and Dentistry - Western University
London, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cetin AR, Unlu N, Cobanoglu N. A five-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite resin restorations in posterior teeth. Oper Dent. 2013 Mar-Apr;38(2):E1-11. doi: 10.2341/12-160-C. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
Mjor IA, Jokstad A. Five-year study of Class II restorations in permanent teeth using amalgam, glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cerment and resin-based composite materials. J Dent. 1993 Dec;21(6):338-43. doi: 10.1016/0300-5712(93)90006-c.
Vidnes-Kopperud S, Tveit AB, Gaarden T, Sandvik L, Espelid I. Factors influencing dentists' choice of amalgam and tooth-colored restorative materials for Class II preparations in younger patients. Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;67(2):74-9. doi: 10.1080/00016350802577800.
Correa MB, Peres MA, Peres KG, Horta BL, Barros AD, Demarco FF. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material. J Dent. 2012 Sep;40(9):703-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.04.020. Epub 2012 Apr 28.
Rasines Alcaraz MG, Veitz-Keenan A, Sahrmann P, Schmidlin PR, Davis D, Iheozor-Ejiofor Z. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 31;(3):CD005620. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005620.pub2.
Rho YJ, Namgung C, Jin BH, Lim BS, Cho BH. Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study. Oper Dent. 2013 Nov-Dec;38(6):572-82. doi: 10.2341/12-432-C. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
Beck F, Lettner S, Graf A, Bitriol B, Dumitrescu N, Bauer P, Moritz A, Schedle A. Survival of direct resin restorations in posterior teeth within a 19-year period (1996-2015): A meta-analysis of prospective studies. Dent Mater. 2015 Aug;31(8):958-85. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.05.004. Epub 2015 Jun 16.
Borgia E, Baron R, Borgia JL. Quality and Survival of Direct Light-Activated Composite Resin Restorations in Posterior Teeth: A 5- to 20-Year Retrospective Longitudinal Study. J Prosthodont. 2019 Jan;28(1):e195-e203. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12630. Epub 2017 May 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
109006
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.