One Year Clinical Evaluation of Conservative Versus Conventional Ceramic Onlays

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-27

Study Completion Date

2023-08-12

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

the aim of present study is to evaluate clinically the fracture liability , marginal adaptation , and patient satisfaction of conservative versus conventional ceramic Onlays use e-max press to restore defective restored molar with old restoration or caries. with one or more cusp defect

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Biological and Esthetic Evaluation of Ceramic Onlay With Different Preparation Designs

NCT04438642

Unsatisfactory Restoration of Tooth Carious Teeth

UNKNOWN NA

Clinical Outcomes of Premolars Restored With Ceramic Vonlay Restorations Versus Onlay Using Modified USPHS Criteria

NCT05114122

Clinical Performance of Ceramic Vonlays

UNKNOWN NA

Clinical Performance Of Conserved Chalky White Demineralized Enamel Cavity Margins Versus Totally Removed Carious Margins In Class V Cavities Restored With Composite Resin

NCT05614076

Class V Dental Caries

UNKNOWN NA

Injectable Resin Composite Versus Dual-cured Resin Cement for Cementation of Indirect Onlay Restorations

NCT05954156

Cementation Teeth Badly Broken Down Vital Teeth

COMPLETED NA

Clinical Evaluation of Direct Composite Veneer Restorations

NCT05842590

Molar Incisor Hypomineralization

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Tooth Decay

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

onlays conservative

conservative onlays preparation with partial cusp coverage only defective cusps

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

onlays conservative

Intervention Type OTHER

Partial coverage of cusps with shoulder finish line

onlays conventional

onlays preparation design conventional as all cusps covered with shoulder finish line preparation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

onlays conventional

Intervention Type OTHER

all coverage of cusps as overlay with shoulder finish line

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

onlays conservative

Partial coverage of cusps with shoulder finish line

Intervention Type OTHER

onlays conventional

all coverage of cusps as overlay with shoulder finish line

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

All subjects are required to be:

1-From 18-50 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document. 2- Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations 3- Psychologically and physically able to withstand conventional dental procedures 4- Patients with teeth problems indicated for onlay restoration:

1. Decayed teeth
2. Teeth restored with defected filling restorations

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patient less than 18 or more than 50 years
2. Patient with active resistant periodontal diseases
3. Patients with poor oral hygiene and uncooperative patients
4. Pregnant women
5. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth
6. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations
7. Lack of opposing dentition in the area of interest

\-

\-

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No