Comparison in Marginal Adaptation Between Conventional and Gull Wing Preparation in Laminates Veneers
NCT ID: NCT03214549
Last Updated: 2017-07-11
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
38 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-07-13
2018-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Marginal Adaptation, Shade Matching, of Polychromatic Feldspathic VS Polychromatic Hybrid Ceramic Laminate Veneer
NCT04942418
One Year Clinical Evaluation of E-max CAD and Lava Ultimate Laminate Veneers
NCT03086928
Clinical Evaluation of Fracture Resistance and Color Changes of Laminate Veneer With Gull Wing Preparation
NCT03321474
Clinical Performance of Ceramic Laminate Veneers Made With Celtra Duo Press and IPS e.Max Press Ceramic
NCT03713970
Clinical Evaluation of Laminate Veneers With Coronal Post Versus Post and Core Foundation Restoration With Single Crown for Restoration of Endodontically Treated Anterior Teeth (Randomized Controlled Trial) "In-vivo Study"
NCT03314545
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Visit 2: Teeth preparation, secondary impression,temporary restoration and teeth sensitivity evaluation using United States Public Health Service criteria.
Visit 3: Placement and permanent cementation of the final restoration
Visit 4: marginal adaptation measurement by electron microscope using impression replica.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
gull wing preparation veneers
intervention: gull wing preparation in laminates veneers proximal margin of the preparation is placed toward the lingual .The area of the proximal margin between the contact area and the gingival papilla is placed even further to the lingual. This preparation design helps to hide the margin when the restorations are viewed from an angle.
gull wing preparation of laminates veneers
preparation involving mesial and distal extension further lingualy.
conventional preparation veneers
intervention: conventional preparation in laminates veneers preparation of veneers without lingual extension of preparation in mesial and distal areas
conventional preparation of laminates veneers
preparation not involving mesial and distal extension further lingualy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
gull wing preparation of laminates veneers
preparation involving mesial and distal extension further lingualy.
conventional preparation of laminates veneers
preparation not involving mesial and distal extension further lingualy.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Be physically and psychologically able to tolerate conventional restorative Procedures.
* Have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations.
* Patients with teeth problems indicated for laminate veneer (e.g:discoloration, fracture not involve more than 50% enamel loss, mild malposition.
* Be willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient with fractured teeth of more than 50% enamel loss.
* Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation.
* Pregnant women.
* Patient with post and core endodontically treated teeth.
* Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
* Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for restoration
18 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Housham nabiel hassan musa
principal investigator
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CairoUni
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.