Cone Beam Computed Tomography Versus Intraoral Digital Radiography in Detection and Measurements of Simulated Periodontal Bone Defects
NCT ID: NCT03729843
Last Updated: 2018-11-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
15 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-11-10
2020-11-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Thus, it is very important to have access to accurate diagnostic tools that can aid clinicians in cultivating an appropriate treatment choice. Periodontal assessments utilizing both clinical and radiographic examinations allow for the establishment of an accurate diagnosis as well as subsequent treatment choices.
Radiography plays an important role in periodontal diagnosis mainly because radiographs can reveal the amount and type of damage caused to the alveolar bone.
Digital imaging technique has created challenging opportunities for dental radiographic diagnosis. Digora was the first digital system for dental radiography based on a photostimulable phosphor technology.
E9ickholz et al. at 1999 compared linear measurements of interproximal bone loss on digitized radiographic images after application of different filters to the gold standard of intrasurgical measurements they concluded that all radiographic assessments on the digitized images came close to the intasurgical gold standard.
2D technologies do not allow for measurement of the bucco-lingual (B-L) width of the defect. Only the vertical height and the mesio-distal (M-D) width of the defect can be measured with 2D images.
Use of 3D volumetric images and 2D images in artificial bone defects have shown that CBCT has a sensitivity of 80% to 100% in detection and classification of bone defects, while intraoral radiographs present a sensitivity of 63% to 67%.
When compared with periapical and panoramic images, the CBCT has also shown an absence of distortion and overlapping, and the dimensions of the images that it presents were compatible with the actual size of the individual.
A few studies have been published comparing CBCT with digital radiography for the detection and measurements of periodontal bone defects.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Periapical Radiography and Cone Beam Computed Tomography on Periapical Assessment Following Surgical Endodontic Treatment
NCT04333940
The Use Of Specially Designed Probe Versus Cone- Beam Computerized Tomography In The Measurement Of Gingival Thickness: Diagnostic Accuracy Study
NCT03628742
Accuracy of Linear Measurements of Ultra-low Dose Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Panoramic Radiography
NCT03719235
The Accuracy of Computer Aided Detection of Periapical Radiolucencies on Cone -Beam Computed Tomography Images Using Artificial Intelligence
NCT05538104
A Comparison of the Accurate Diagnosis of the Horizontal & Vertical Bitewing Images
NCT04341636
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Regenerative therapies for both intrabony and furcation defects are viable options, but early management of these defects offers the greatest potential for periodontal health. Intrabony defect morphology as well as degree of furcation involvement may affect overall regenerative outcomes and/or optimal treatment strategies.
Radiographic bone loss is also useful for assigning descriptors to indicate severity of periodontitis: \<1/3 bone loss = mild, 1/3 to ½ bone loss = moderate, and \>½ bone loss = severe. Classification of bony defects given by Papapanou et al. 2000 was used to differentiate bone defects into: Suprabony defects (SB), Infrabony defects (IB), Interradicular defects (IR).For classifying the intrabony defects (IT), the investigators used classification system by Goldman and Cohen 1958 which classified the IT defects into: 1 wall, 2 wall , 3 wall and Combined bone defects (CB). Other bone defects (OB) were classified by their topography as:Bulbous bone contour (BB), Reversed architecture (RA), Dehiscence (DH).
The potentially existing radiological furcation involvement was examined by identifying the furcation upper boundary and furcation lower boundary and was classified as Subclass A, B, and C according to the classification system by Tarnow and Fletcher 1984, where he added the vertical component to the diagnosis of furcation involvement. Subclass based on the vertical bone resorption from the furcation fornix was added.
* Subclass A: Denotes furcation involvements with vertical bone loss of 3 mm or less.
* Subclass B: Denotes furcation involvements with vertical bone loss from 4 to 6 mm.
* Subclass C: Presents with bone loss from the fornix of 7 mm or more.
* The SB, IB, and OB defects were considered as absolute defects while IR defects were considered as relative defects because IR defects do not depict a particular bone lesion or defect rather they represent the stage in progress of periodontitis, i.e., once the periodontal disease progresses or its severity increases, it is bound to erode the bone between the multirooted teeth and involve the furcation.
Digital radiography is changing the diagnosis and treatment of dental diseases by incorporating computer technology into the field of dentistry. digital radiography have several advantages over film radiography, including immediate image production with solid-state devices; interactive display on a monitor with the ability to enhance image features and make direct linear and densitometric measurements; integrated storage; fast communication of images; lower contamination of the environment; security mechanisms to identify original images; ability to tag information such as a patient identifier, date of exposure and other relevant details; interoperability of the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) file format, which enables practitioners with different equipment and software to view and enhance the same images.
Furthermore, digital radiography offers a plethora of technical innovations to dentistry and is sure to significantly influence the arts of diagnosis, monitoring, research, as well as the treatment of dental diseases.
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a relatively new extra-oral imaging system which was specifically developed to overcome the limitations of periapical radiographs as it produces undistorted 3D information of the maxillofacial skeleton with a substantially lower radiation dose compared to conventional CT.
Consequently, CBCT has the potential to become non-invasive diagnostic instrument for various dental applications in which defect characterization, localization and volume measurements are important.
CBCT is currently being considered as a superior diagnostic tool for applications in periodontology. CBCT scanning was found to be more effective than other 2D imaging modalities in assessing periodontal structures. As CBCT had better potential of detecting periodontal bone defects in all directions compared with periapical radiographs. More over interproximal areas also, buccal and lingual defects could not be recognized from each other with intraoral radiographs.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CBCT and intraoral digital radiography
simulated bone defects will be detected and measured by 2 techniques using CBCT and using intraoral digital radiography and the all measurements will be compared with the gold standard real measurements on the dry jaws
CBCT and intraoral digital radiography
Simulated periodontal bone defects will be measured by 2 techniques: group I detected and measured using CBCT and group II intraoral digital radiography and all the measurements will be compared with the gold standard real measurements on the dry jaws
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CBCT and intraoral digital radiography
Simulated periodontal bone defects will be measured by 2 techniques: group I detected and measured using CBCT and group II intraoral digital radiography and all the measurements will be compared with the gold standard real measurements on the dry jaws
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The teeth will be naturally attached to human jaws.
* The study samples will not identified by age or gender group.
Exclusion Criteria
* Teeth with anomalies and fractures.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Marwa Mohamed Ali
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marwa Mohamed Ali
Lecturer Assistant of Oral Radiology Department
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hossam Kandil, Professor
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Cairo University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HPHH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.