Retrospective Analysis of Complications and Survival of Teeth Restored Following Crown Lengthening
NCT ID: NCT07259187
Last Updated: 2025-12-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
81 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-03-22
2023-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In order to assist dentists to make an evidence-based decision during treatment planning, this retrospective study aims to investigate the complications and survival rate of the teeth receiving crown following crown lengthening.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical and Radiographical Evaluation of CAD-CAM Crowns With and Without Deep Margin Elevation
NCT06114030
Cone Beam Computed Tomography Versus Intraoral Digital Radiography in Detection and Measurements of Simulated Periodontal Bone Defects
NCT03729843
Using Superimposition of Intra-Oral Scan and CBCT in Single Implant Restorations in Aesthetic Zone.
NCT05053958
Digital Subtraction Radiography Evaluation of SMART Restoration With Partial Caries Removal in Primary Teeth
NCT01749267
Influences of Gingival Cord Retractor in Retention Rate of Non-carious Cervical Lesions Restorations.
NCT02961049
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this retrospective study the records of patients who received surgical CLP prior to receiving full coverage crowns at X hospital between January 2011 to January 2021 were obtained and reviewed by A.AH and F.AR for possible inclusion in the study. Retrospective data were collected manually from digital records of registered patients (Dental4windows, Centaur Software Development Co Pty Ltd., Australia). All personal information is de-identified and securely stored with a study code number. The data were then organized into categories based on a pre-determined form for single crowns with CLP .
The calculation of sample size was based on a 10-year survival rate of 78.4% tooth preservation after crown lengthening procedure and restorative treatment in department of periodontics and oral medicine at the school of dentistry of the university of Michigan (where p is the prevalence of crown after crown lengthening, d is the precision of the estimate, and z\_(α/2)\^2 is the quartile of the 95% confidence interval).
Using the above equation and data from the aforementioned study, the sample size needed is determined to be 260 teeth.
Statistical Analysis The collected data will be transferred to Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows (IBM- SPSS) version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for statistical analysis.
Significance for statistical analysis will be set at P \< 0.05. Chi-square analysis will be used to measure the association strength between the frequency of both the survival of crown after crown lengthening and the complications. Kaplan-Meier will be used for analysis of the survival and Logistic regression will be used for the potential risk factors. P values \<0.05 will be considered as a statistically significant.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
single crowns post surgical crown lenghtening
Patients who underwent surgical crown lengthening prior to receiving single-crown restorations were contacted to participate in the study. The restored teeth were clinically and radiographically examined. Demographic data, patient- and tooth- related details, prevalence of prosthodontic, periodontal, and/or endodontic complications, as well as failure rate with underlying reason were documented and analyzed.
Periapical radiograph
Clinical and radiographic examinations were completed for the treated teeth. For participants who had radiographs within past one year of examination no further radiographs were obtained. Demographic parameters, systemic and patient-related factors such as smoking, diabetes mellitus, parafunctional habits (self-reported or diagnosed bruxism and clenching), location of tooth (maxilla or mandible, anterior or posterior), history of treated periodontitis, history of endodontic treatment, and history of regular dental attendance were documented. Furthermore, periodontal status was evaluated by assessing mobility, probing pocket depth, bleeding index, plaque index, restorative margin position in relation to the gingival margin, and crown to root ratio based on periapical radiographs taken using long-cone parallel technique. In addition, prosthetic factors including crown material and opposing dentition, namely tooth, crown, or removable partial denture were recorded.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Periapical radiograph
Clinical and radiographic examinations were completed for the treated teeth. For participants who had radiographs within past one year of examination no further radiographs were obtained. Demographic parameters, systemic and patient-related factors such as smoking, diabetes mellitus, parafunctional habits (self-reported or diagnosed bruxism and clenching), location of tooth (maxilla or mandible, anterior or posterior), history of treated periodontitis, history of endodontic treatment, and history of regular dental attendance were documented. Furthermore, periodontal status was evaluated by assessing mobility, probing pocket depth, bleeding index, plaque index, restorative margin position in relation to the gingival margin, and crown to root ratio based on periapical radiographs taken using long-cone parallel technique. In addition, prosthetic factors including crown material and opposing dentition, namely tooth, crown, or removable partial denture were recorded.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient Characteristics:
Age between 18 and 70 years at the time of the CLP. Able and willing to participate, with written informed consent obtained.
\- Follow-up and Documentation Requirements: A minimum of 12 months had elapsed since placement of the definitive crown at the time of data collection. Baseline intraoral radiographs available prior to CLP to document periodontal and structural condition.
\- Tooth-Level Clinical Criteria: Tooth mobility not exceeding Miller Class I at baseline. A planned or anticipated crown-root ratio ≥1:1 following CLP based on clinical and radiographic evaluation.
Exclusion Criteria
* Cases involving intentional endodontic treatment and CLP performed solely to correct supra-eruption for prosthetic clearance (i.e., without biological indication).
* Baseline Dental and Periodontal Condition:
Teeth exhibiting furcation involvement at baseline. Mobility greater than Miller Class I preoperatively.
* Teeth functioning as abutments for fixed dental prostheses, due to altered biomechanical loading.
* Treatment Completion and Record Accuracy:
Absence or incompleteness of clinical or radiographic documentation prior to CLP. Incomplete endodontic, periodontal, or definitive restorative treatment at the time of review.
* The final restoration was not a full-coverage definitive crown.
* Follow-up and Participant Availability:
Follow-up duration less than 12 months after crown placement. Patients who declined participation or could not be contacted for consent.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Maanas Shah
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maanas Shah, BDS MSD CAGS MRACDS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mohammed Bin Rashid University of Medicine and Health Sciences
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Dubai Dental Hospital
Dubai, , United Arab Emirates
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ashnagar S, Barootchi S, Ravida A, Tattan M, Wang HL, Wang CW. Long-term survival of structurally compromised tooth preserved with crown lengthening procedure and restorative treatment: A pilot retrospective analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jul;46(7):751-757. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13124. Epub 2019 May 31.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MBRU-IRB-2022-97
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.