Digital Radiography in Detection of Recurrent Caries Underneath Chlorhexidine Containing Adhesive Versus Conventional Adhesive After One Year Follow up: Randomized Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT03139409

Last Updated: 2019-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

37 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-07-20

Study Completion Date

2018-07-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will be conducted to compare the effect of chlorexidine containing adhesive versus conventional one in prevention of secondary caries lesion underneath composite restoration over one year follow up null hypothesis

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

each patient will have at least 2 class II cavities.one will be restored using the intervention and the other using the control.

Digital radiographs will be taken and the images will be processed using a digital system. Then the teeth will be evaluated by expert in dental radiology who had no awareness of the results of the visual inspection. The examiner will use a radiograph viewer and a radiographic film magnifier to determine the presence or absence of radiolucency underlying the restoration. The clinical and radiographic examination will be assessed according to the FDI World Dental Federation clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations The aim of this equivalent trial is to examine if the chlorhexidine containing adhesive is effective as the conventional adhesive in prevention of recurrent caries under resin composite restoration after one year follow up in high caries risk patients with class II cavities. Based on the previous papers by Papagiannoulis et al .,1999 and kohler et al.,2000, the success rate reported was about 95% (absence of caries). If there is truly no difference between the standard and experimental treatment, then 37 patients are required to be 80% sure that the limits of a two-sided 90% confidence interval will exclude a difference between the standard and experimental group of more than 15 %. The sample size was calculated by sealed envelope online.

Data will be analyzed using IBM SPSS advanced statistics (statistical package for social sciences), version 21 ( SPSS Inc. Chicago , IL). Numerical data will be described as mean and standard deviation or median and range. Categorical data will be described as numbers and percentages. Comparisons between categorical variables will be performed using the chi square test. An equivalent limit will be tested. A P -value less than or equal 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. All tests will be two tailed

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Recurrent Caries Incidence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

conventonal adhesive

peak lc bond

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

adhesive bond with chlorhexidine

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Peak® Universal Bond (ultradent, 505 West 10200 South, South Jordan, UT 84095،USA ) light-Cured Adhesive with Chlorhexidine (0.2%), 7.5% filler, phosphate and containing hydroxyethyl methacrylate with ethyl alcohol as the carrier. its viscosity has been optimized for minimal film thickness (2μm) and superior strength. using self etch adhesive with chlorexidine as one step in the bonding component may give chance to proper penetration of resin tags, decrease the micro-organisms due to the antibacterial effect of chlorexidine (Bin-Shuwaish, 2016) and also the addition of chlorexidine in bonding system may be an excellent tool to increase the stability of collagen fibrils within the hybrid layer against host-derived metaloproteinases (MMP) without the need for additional steps for the bonding protocol (Stanislawczuk, et al., 2009), which results in better durability and good restorations with decreasing the incidence of recurrent caries

Time variable

Diagnosis and follow up will be immediate ,6 months later and 1 year

Group Type OTHER

Time variable

Intervention Type OTHER

Diagnosis and follow up will be immediate , 6 months later and 1 year

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

adhesive bond with chlorhexidine

Peak® Universal Bond (ultradent, 505 West 10200 South, South Jordan, UT 84095،USA ) light-Cured Adhesive with Chlorhexidine (0.2%), 7.5% filler, phosphate and containing hydroxyethyl methacrylate with ethyl alcohol as the carrier. its viscosity has been optimized for minimal film thickness (2μm) and superior strength. using self etch adhesive with chlorexidine as one step in the bonding component may give chance to proper penetration of resin tags, decrease the micro-organisms due to the antibacterial effect of chlorexidine (Bin-Shuwaish, 2016) and also the addition of chlorexidine in bonding system may be an excellent tool to increase the stability of collagen fibrils within the hybrid layer against host-derived metaloproteinases (MMP) without the need for additional steps for the bonding protocol (Stanislawczuk, et al., 2009), which results in better durability and good restorations with decreasing the incidence of recurrent caries

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Time variable

Diagnosis and follow up will be immediate , 6 months later and 1 year

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

peak universal bond

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients should be 20-25 years of age with high caries risk. Patients should have an acceptable oral hygiene level. Patients must have at least two proximal lesions to be restored.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients with a compromised medical history. Severe or active periodontal disease. Heavy bruxism or a traumatic occlusion. Lack of compliance
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

25 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Katreen Tawfik

Internal Resident

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Oral Medicine and Dentistry

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBC-CU-2017-044-16

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.