Assessment of the Outcome of Endodontic Treatment Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

NCT ID: NCT03660163

Last Updated: 2018-09-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

65 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-11-01

Study Completion Date

2019-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the study is to assess the correlation between pre-obturation bacterial detection using fluorescence amplification and outcome of endodontic treatments. Thus, enabling a suitable detection threshold to predict the likelihood of treatment failure. This has the potential to be used a bench side tool in general dental practice to act as a surrogate endpoint for clinicians performing root canal treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Pre-obturation root canal samples were taken using paper points from patients undergoing primary root treatments. The samples were analyzed using a fluorescent spectrometer and a molecular fluorescent vital dye (Calcein AM).

Pre-operative and 1-year post-operative periapical radiographs and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans were assessed by two calibrated expert examiners to evaluate the outcome of the root canal treatments.

The use of a chairside bacterial stain can allow the clinician to predict the outcome of treatment with confidence. Sampling the root canal space with endodontic paper points followed by ex-situ fluorescent staining and analysis provides a patient-friendly, simple to use and rapid way of predicting root canal treatment outcome.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Periapical Periodontitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with at least one tooth diagnosed with the endodontic disease.
* teeth that were tender to percussion and palpation.
* teeth that had a sinus tract and/ swelling.
* Both primary treatment teeth and teeth which had already been root treated were considered.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients were excluded if they were pregnant.
* Immunosuppressed patients.
* Non-restorable teeth.
* Teeth with a periodontal probing depth greater than 3mm.
* Teeth with apical radiolucencies with the longest dimension above 1.2cm.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

King's College London

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shanon Patel, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

King's College London

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Knight A, Blewitt I, Al-Nuaimi N, Watson T, Herzog D, Festy F, Patel S, Foschi F, Koller G, Mannocci F. Rapid Chairside Microbial Detection Predicts Endodontic Treatment Outcome. J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 3;9(7):2086. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072086.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32635158 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

08/H0804/79 v.3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.