Reliability of Light Induced Fluorescence Intraoral Camera Versus Visual-Tactile Method in Assessment of Marginal Integrity of Resin Composite Restorations: Diagnostic Invivo Study

NCT ID: NCT03090061

Last Updated: 2017-08-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

29 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-07-01

Study Completion Date

2018-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will be conducted to assess diagnostic predictive values of a light induced fluorescence intraoral camera versus those of the visual-tactile assessment method according to FDI criteria in clinical evaluation the margins of resin composite restorations

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Each patient should have at least one resin composite restoration. The restoration will be evaluated by two diagnostic methods.

Each examiner will record the dental findings using both the visual- tactile assessment method and the fluorescent-aided identification method. The visual-tactile assessment method includes the use of mirror, FDI probe under good illumination condition, while the fluorescent-aided identification method will be performed by light induced fluorescence intraoral camera then the reliability of each diagnostic tool will be assessed.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Microleakage Around Resin Composite Restorations

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The assessors will not be blind about the type of intervention/control assessment methods. However it will not be allowed amongst the examiners to exchange any information throughout the entire study period

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Light induced fluorescence intraoral camera

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Light induced fluorescence intraoral camera

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

assessment of marginal integrity of resin composite restorations by light induced fluorescence intraoral camera

Visual-tactile assessment method according to FDI criteria

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Visual-tactile assessment method according to FDI criteria

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

assessment of marginal integrity of resin composite restorations by visual-tactile method that includes the use of mirror, FDI probe under good illumination condition,

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Light induced fluorescence intraoral camera

assessment of marginal integrity of resin composite restorations by light induced fluorescence intraoral camera

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Visual-tactile assessment method according to FDI criteria

assessment of marginal integrity of resin composite restorations by visual-tactile method that includes the use of mirror, FDI probe under good illumination condition,

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients should be over 18 years of age.
* Patients should have an acceptable oral hygiene level.
* Patients must have at least one posterior resin composite restoration.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a compromised medical history.
* Severe or active periodontal disease.
* Heavy bruxism or a traumatic occlusion.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Aya Mohamed Adly

internal resident

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Faculty of Oral and Dental Medicine, Cairo University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBC-CU-2017-03-14

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Comparative Evaluation of Class V Restorations
NCT06164418 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA