Validity of Fluorescence-Based Devices Versus Visual-Tactile Method in Detection of Secondary Caries Around Resin Composite Restorations: Invivo Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-21

Study Completion Date

2021-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study will be conducted to evaluate the clinical performance and validity of both light-induced fluorescence intraoral camera and laser-induced fluorescence device in comparison to visual-tactile assessment method in detection of secondary caries around margins of resin composite restorations.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Reliability of Light Induced Fluorescence Intraoral Camera Versus Visual-Tactile Method in Assessment of Marginal Integrity of Resin Composite Restorations: Diagnostic Invivo Study

NCT03090061

Microleakage Around Resin Composite Restorations

UNKNOWN NA

Reliability of Fluorescent Camera in Diagnosis of Occlusal Carious Lesion

NCT03224962

Caries

UNKNOWN

Reliability of Secondary Caries Detection Around Composite Restoration Using Light Induced Fluorescence

NCT03558113

Secondary Caries

UNKNOWN NA

Reliability of Fluorescent Camera and Caries Detection Dye Versus the Visual Tactile Method

NCT03051594

Dental Caries

UNKNOWN NA

In-Vivo Validation of Novel Diagnostic Devices Versus Visual ICDAS-II Criteria in Detection of Early Occlusal Caries

NCT06790485

Dental Caries (Diagnosis)

COMPLETED

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Each patient should have at least one resin composite restoration. The restoration will be evaluated by all diagnostic methods. Each examiner will independently record the dental findings using all methods, the visual- tactile assessment method and both fluorescent-aided identification methods. The visual-tactile assessment method includes the use of mirror, probe under good illumination condition, while the fluorescent-aided identification methods will be performed by both light-induced fluorescence intraoral camera and laser-induced fluorescence device. Then Diagnostic performance for caries detection was evaluated, assessing the validity of each diagnostic method in diagnosing secondary caries around margins of resin composite restorations

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Secondary Caries Around Resin Composite Restorations

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

The assessors will not be blind about the type of intervention/control assessment methods. However it will not be allowed amongst the examiners to exchange any information throughout the entire study period

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.