Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
379 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-08-01
2026-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessment of Root Canal Curvatures of the Permanent Mandibular First and Second Molars in a Sample of Egyptian Population Using CBCT
NCT04555070
The Prevalence of Extra Root Canals and the Root Canal Configuration in Mandibular Anterior Teeth in a Sample of Egyptian Population Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography
NCT03935711
Prevalence of Second Mesiobuccal Canal of Maxillary First and Second Molars Among Egyptian Population
NCT03225573
A Cone-beam Computed Tomography Study of Root and Root Canal Morphology of Maxillary Premolars in an Egyptian Subpopulation
NCT03563508
Frequency of Root Fenestration and Dehiscence in Adult Egyptian Population Using CBCT.
NCT03471715
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The reported success rate of endodontic treatments by general dentists ranges from 60% to 75%. Procedural errors are a significant factor contributing to the suboptimal success rate of endodontic treatments performed by general dentists. Moreover, the global prevalence of periapical lesion is approximately 52% in individuals and 5% in teeth, with higher frequency in teeth with root-filled teeth compered to non-treated teeth.
Procedural errors may be difficult to correct. Certain procedural errors could need endodontic retreatment, apicoectomy, or even tooth extraction. Root canal transportation, apical perforation, strip perforation, access cavity perforation, and instrument fracture are among the commonly occurring procedural errors. The working length of the root canal filling is a critical factor, with fillings short of the apex by 2 mm reducing success rates to 68-77% and overfills beyond the apex yielding around 75% success rates.
Endodontic treatment for molar teeth is more challenging and requires more caution than anterior and premolar teeth, and is associated with a higher rate of procedural errors. The reason for this is their difficulty in accessibility and anatomical complexity. This is reflected in the distribution of errors, were Procedural errors were more frequently observed in mandibular teeth (53.1%) than maxillary teeth (46.9%), with the highest error rate found in the right and left permanent mandibular first molars (20.2% and 14.3%, respectively).
Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) it delivers high-quality images and images providing three-dimensional imaging, allowing detailed views of individual teeth from any angle. This makes it an effective tool for diagnosing, planning, and monitoring endodontic treatment. CBCT can detect periapical radiolucency before they would be apparent on conventional radiographs. While traditional radiographs are less expensive and expose patients to lower radiation doses, research has demonstrated that CBCT images are better for diagnosing periapical lesions.
Rationale for conducting the research:
In Egypt, there is a lack of comprehensive data regarding the prevalence and distribution of procedural errors in endodontically treated teeth. This knowledge gap limits our understanding of how these errors differ between the maxilla and mandible and restricts the development of targeted strategies to enhance treatment quality and reduce failure rates.
Despite significant advancements in endodontic techniques and imaging modalities, procedural errors remain a critical challenge in achieving optimal treatment outcomes. These errors are particularly problematic in molar teeth due to their anatomical complexity and reduced accessibility. Although several international studies have evaluated the prevalence of endodontic procedural errors, there is limited research focusing specifically on the Egyptian subpopulation.
Understanding the patterns and frequencies of procedural errors in maxillary and mandibular teeth among Egyptians can aid clinicians in anticipating challenges, refining treatment strategies, and minimizing procedural failures. Moreover, differences in error distribution between the two jaws reported in other populations highlight the need for local investigation.
CBCT technology provides a detailed three-dimensional assessment of dental anatomy and procedural errors, offering superior diagnostic capabilities compared to two-dimensional radiography. This makes it an ideal tool for evaluating the prevalence and distribution of endodontic procedural errors.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the prevalence and distribution of endodontic procedural errors in the maxilla and mandible using CBCT imaging in a selected Egyptian subpopulation.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No Clinical Intervention - Analysis of Previously Acquired CBCT Scans
This study does not involve any clinical or therapeutic intervention. It is solely based on the retrospective analysis of previously acquired CBCT scans from patients who have undergone root canal treatment. No drugs, devices, or procedures are administered or applied to participants as part of this study.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scans showing both jaw (maxilla and mandible) .
* Scans with good image quality and a voxel size of 0.2 mm or 0.3 mm.
* Egyptian nationals of either gender.
* Age over 18 years.
Exclusion Criteria
* Completely edentulous patient.
* Low-quality images or scans with artefacts.
* Scans with voxel size larger than 0.3 mm.
* Non- Egyptian patients.
* Surgically treated endodontic cases (e.g., apicoectomy).
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Esbah Adam Ahmed Mohamed
Master Degree Candidate in Endodontics, Cairo University
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Nehal N. Roshdy, Professor of Endodontics
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Cairo University
Dr.sara, Lecturer in Endodontics
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Cairo University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Yousuf W, Khan M, Mehdi H. Endodontic Procedural Errors: Frequency, Type of Error, and the Most Frequently Treated Tooth. Int J Dent. 2015;2015:673914. doi: 10.1155/2015/673914. Epub 2015 Aug 10.
de Paula-Silva FW, Wu MK, Leonardo MR, da Silva LA, Wesselink PR. Accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans in diagnosing apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a gold standard. J Endod. 2009 Jul;35(7):1009-12. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.04.006.
Patel S, Durack C, Abella F, Shemesh H, Roig M, Lemberg K. Cone beam computed tomography in Endodontics - a review. Int Endod J. 2015 Jan;48(1):3-15. doi: 10.1111/iej.12270. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
Nascimento EHL, Gaeta-Araujo H, Andrade MFS, Freitas DQ. Prevalence of technical errors and periapical lesions in a sample of endodontically treated teeth: a CBCT analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Sep;22(7):2495-2503. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2344-y. Epub 2018 Jan 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
New ENDO 1-1-1 n/code=7 (3/5 G
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.