Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
87 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-09-01
2024-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Prevalence of Incisal Angle of Maxillary Central Incisors in Adults
NCT07006519
Assessment of Root Canal Curvatures of the Permanent Mandibular First and Second Molars in a Sample of Egyptian Population Using CBCT
NCT04555070
Using Superimposition of Intra-Oral Scan and CBCT in Single Implant Restorations in Aesthetic Zone.
NCT05053958
Assessment of Variations of The Number of Roots &Amp; Root Canal Configurations of Maxillary Premolars and Their Relation to the Floor of the Maxillary Sinus
NCT04018352
Use of Artificial Intelligence in Oral Radiology: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study in Egypt
NCT06908603
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ovoid dental arch
No interventions assigned to this group
Square dental arch
No interventions assigned to this group
Tapered dental arch
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scans of patients who have complete set of permanent dentitions (third molars are not considered), or at least not more than one tooth is missed in each arch.
* CBCT scans with field of view that shows the full view of TMJ.
Exclusion Criteria
* CBCT scans of patients with pathological lesions in the TMJ or articular eminence.
* CBCT scans with artifacts that could interfere with the assessment of the articular eminence and dental arches.
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sarah Mohamed Khaled Hassan Mohamed Ali
Dr. Sarah Khaled
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bertram F, Hupp L, Schnabl D, Rudisch A, Emshoff R. Association Between Missing Posterior Teeth and Occurrence of Temporomandibular Joint Condylar Erosion: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study. Int J Prosthodont. 2018 January/February;31(1):9-14. doi: 10.11607/ijp.5111. Epub 2017 Nov 16.
Costa EDD, Peyneau PD, Roque-Torres GD, Freitas DQ, Ramirez-Sotelo LR, Ambrosano GMB, Verner FS. The relationship of articular eminence and mandibular fossa morphology to facial profile and gender determined by cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2019 Dec;128(6):660-666. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
Dzingute A, Pileicikiene G, Baltrusaityte A, Skirbutis G. Evaluation of the relationship between the occlusion parameters and symptoms of the temporomandibular joint disorder. Acta Med Litu. 2017;24(3):167-175. doi: 10.6001/actamedica.v24i3.3551.
Fan XC, Ma LS, Chen L, Singh D, Rausch-Fan X, Huang XF. Temporomandibular Joint Osseous Morphology of Class I and Class II Malocclusions in the Normal Skeletal Pattern: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Mar 18;11(3):541. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030541.
Hamza MK, Shantha AM, Ashwathappa DT, Rajanna S, Puttegowda AK. Assessing the Articular Eminence Asymmetry in Dentate, Partially Edentulous and Edentulous patients Using Cone-Beam Ct. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S667-S671. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_685_20. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
Hou X, Xu X, Zhao M, Kong J, Wang M, Lee ES, Jia Q, Jiang HB. An overview of three-dimensional imaging devices in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022 Dec;34(8):1179-1196. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12955. Epub 2022 Aug 15.
Ilguy D, Ilguy M, Fisekcioglu E, Dolekoglu S, Ersan N. Articular eminence inclination, height, and condyle morphology on cone beam computed tomography. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014 Feb 13;2014:761714. doi: 10.1155/2014/761714. eCollection 2014.
Matsuda S, Yamaguchi T, Mikami S, Yoshimura H, Gotouda A. Can malocclusion provide clinicians with information for differential diagnosis of temporomandibular joint diseases?: A review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 19;101(33):e29247. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029247.
Moscagiuri F, Caroccia F, Lopes C, Di Carlo B, Di Maria E, Festa F, D'Attilio M. Evaluation of Articular Eminence Inclination in Normo-Divergent Subjects with Different Skeletal Classes through CBCT. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jun 3;18(11):5992. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115992.
Othman SA, Xinwei ES, Lim SY, Jamaludin M, Mohamed NH, Yusof ZY, Shoaib LA, Nik Hussein NN. Comparison of arch form between ethnic Malays and Malaysian Aborigines in Peninsular Malaysia. Korean J Orthod. 2012 Feb;42(1):47-54. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.1.47. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
Omar H, Alhajrasi M, Felemban N, Hassan A. Dental arch dimensions, form and tooth size ratio among a Saudi sample. Saudi Med J. 2018 Jan;39(1):86-91. doi: 10.15537/smj.2018.1.21035.
Reissmann DR, Anderson GC, Heydecke G, Schiffman EL. Effect of Shortened Dental Arch on Temporomandibular Joint Intra-articular Disorders. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2018 Summer;32(3):329-337. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1910.
Sumbullu MA, Caglayan F, Akgul HM, Yilmaz AB. Radiological examination of the articular eminence morphology using cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2012 Mar;41(3):234-40. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/24780643. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
Verner FS, Roque-Torres GD, Ramirez-Sotello LR, Devito KL, Almeida SM. Analysis of the correlation between dental arch and articular eminence morphology: a cone beam computed tomography study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017 Oct;124(4):420-431. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
Virlan MJR, Paun DL, Bordea EN, Pellegrini A, Spinu AD, Ivascu RV, Nimigean V, Nimigean VR. Factors influencing the articular eminence of the temporomandibular joint (Review). Exp Ther Med. 2021 Oct;22(4):1084. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10518. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
Zhang J, Jiao K, Zhang M, Zhou T, Liu XD, Yu SB, Lu L, Jing L, Yang T, Zhang Y, Chen D, Wang MQ. Occlusal effects on longitudinal bone alterations of the temporomandibular joint. J Dent Res. 2013 Mar;92(3):253-9. doi: 10.1177/0022034512473482. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Dental arch&Articular eminence
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.