Impact Of Digital Photography & Conventional Method On The Accuracy Of Dental Shade Matching In The Esthetic Zone

NCT ID: NCT03229707

Last Updated: 2021-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

9 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-01

Study Completion Date

2019-08-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study:

Is to evaluate the accuracy of digital photography in optimizing shade matching when compared to conventional method of shade selection.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Randomized control trial, 2 groups will be included. Group 1: Color matching using Vita 3D master, using modified (USPHS) criteria Group 2: Color matching using digital photography using (Photoshop adopt) the assessment will be through a questionnaire for the patient satisfaction outcome using Visual analogue scale

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Accuracy of Dental Shade Selection in the Aesthetic Zone

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group 1 Color matching using Vita 3D master

Outcome Name: Color Matching measured by :

Modified (USPHS) criteria

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Vita 3D master shade guide

Intervention Type DEVICE

Alpha (A)Perfectly matched Beta (B)Not perfectly matched Charlie (C)unacceptable Determent by 10 observers

group 2 Color matching using digital photography

Outcome Name: Color Matching measured by Digital Photography using (Photoshop)

Software:

* 0 to 1: no difference in perception
* 1 to 2: only perceptible to a trained observer
* 2 to 3.5: perceptible difference
* 3.5 to 5: marked difference

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Digital photography using software Photoshop

Intervention Type DEVICE

When taking the image, a gray card is used for subsequent exposure calibration in Adobe Camera Raw (which is packaged with Photoshop).

* Images are then opened into Photoshop.
* The "INFO" panel must be open.
* Click on the small eyedropper in the Info panel window and click on ''Lab Color".
* Place the mouse over the center of the tooth to be measured for L value.
* Click on the "HSB Color" option, which stands for hue, saturation, and brightness.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Digital photography using software Photoshop

When taking the image, a gray card is used for subsequent exposure calibration in Adobe Camera Raw (which is packaged with Photoshop).

* Images are then opened into Photoshop.
* The "INFO" panel must be open.
* Click on the small eyedropper in the Info panel window and click on ''Lab Color".
* Place the mouse over the center of the tooth to be measured for L value.
* Click on the "HSB Color" option, which stands for hue, saturation, and brightness.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Vita 3D master shade guide

Alpha (A)Perfectly matched Beta (B)Not perfectly matched Charlie (C)unacceptable Determent by 10 observers

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Conventional shade matching

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients between 18-70 years old, able to read and sign the informed consent document.
2. Patients requiring restorations in the esthetic zone.
3. Patients don't have active periodontal or pulpal diseases
4. Patients willing to return for follow-up examination and evaluation.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients in the growth stage.
2. Patients with poor oral hygiene and lack of motivation.
3. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rawan Ferroukhi

Master Student

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rawan Ferroukhi, Masters in FixedProsthodontics

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

MSc Student of Fixed Prosthodontics, Division of Fixed Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cairo University

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBC-CU-2017-07-17

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.