Assessment of Tooth Shade After De- and Re-Hydration During Clinical Restorative Procedures

NCT ID: NCT04348773

Last Updated: 2020-04-16

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: UNKNOWN
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 10 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2020-04-15
• Study Completion Date: 2020-06-01

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to investigate any change in tooth color resulting from dehydration resulted from rubber dam application and the time required for any change to return to baseline and to investigate the nature of change and areas of the teeth most affected.

Detailed Description

Architecturally speaking, a smile comprises 60% of the weight of our face. Subconsciously, a smile has a visual impact on people appearance. Also statistically reveal that people place a high value on their smiles according to the American academy of cosmetic dentistry survey (AACD)2017. As the population becomes increasingly aware of the role teeth play in appearance, patients' expectations of aesthetics in contemporary dentistry are ever increasing. So practicing esthetic dentistry that is defined as reproducing natural looking teeth by creating perfect esthetic restorations has been for long time a strict challenge due to many materials' limitations impacting either shade integration or surface quality, and possibly colour stability.

Tooth colour was the main reason for patient dissatisfaction in a survey concerned with esthetic appearance.(1) Thus accurate shade measurement together with proper communication of tooth colour is integral to a successful aesthetic outcome.(2) It is compulsory that clinicians understand the light interaction with tooth structures as well as the proper histo-anatomic principles for a better material and shade selection during direct and indirect restorative procedures. Tooth structures form a complex optical medium for light as it passes through enamel, dentino-enamel complex and dentin in terms of gradient between transparency (complete transmission of light) and opacification (complete reflection of light).(3)Furthermore, this behavior changes over the years, as tissues change in morphology and composition. Comprehension of dynamic aging of tooth structures is a key for success when selecting the proper value and chromaticity for restorative materials.(4,5) Thus clinicians and technicians should have sufficient training in tooth shade selection. For achieving excellent esthetic outcomes there are four main contributing variables: Dynamic Light Interaction, Histo-anatomical Features, Smilography and the 9 Elements of visual synthesis.(3) In the modern dental practice, restoring the optical features of the intact tooth presents a challenging task, due to the inherent translucent nature of enamel, the dentinoenamel complex (DEC) and dentin. Translucent materials offer a significant color measurement challenge since they interact with light in a far more complex manner than most other materials. The old traditional visual estimation approaches that solely employ the Munsell color model system based on hue, chroma, and value (H/C/V) dominating the dental market appear to be insufficient when assigning the relevant information among the dental team members (clinician/technician/patient).(6) In 1931 The Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage (CIE) defined a standard light source, developed a standard observer and enabled the calculation of tri-stimulus x, y, z values, which represent how the human visual system responds to a given colour and allows us to transform spectral energy data into meaningful colour data. It should be noted that the DE in the L*a*b* colour space indicates the degree of colour difference not the direction of the colour difference. It is frequently interpreted in dental literature that a DE of 1 is the 50:50 perceptibility threshold. The hues of natural teeth tend to be in the yellow to yelloworange range, determined mainly by the colour of dentine, with enamel playing only a minor role through scattering at wavelengths in the blue range.(7) Instruments for clinical shade matching include spectrophotometers, colourimeters and digital imaging systems.(8) It has been reported that VITA Easyshade has to be the most reliable instrument in both in vitro and in vivo circumstances.(2) It has been reported that dehydration of teeth can make them appear whiter by increasing enamel opacity when examined by The Easyshade as the light can no longer scatter from hydroxyapatite crystal to crystal.(6,10,11)The resulted loss of translucency on dehydration therefore causes more reflection masking the color of the underlying dentine and thus appears lighter. Russell et al.(12) applied a rubber dam to the anterior teeth of seven subjects and allowed the teeth to dehydrate for 15 min that was measured using a spectrophotometer and further three spectrophotometric measurements were taken at 10 min intervals after removal of rubber dam and tooth rehydration. It was noticed that tooth colour had become lighter and less saturated after dehydration and the colour of the teeth returned to their baseline values 20 min after removal of the rubber dam. Most dental procedures cause some dehydration of teeth.(13-16) It is recommended to record the shade of teeth at the begining of the appointment but there is insufficient evidence in the dental literature to support it.(14) Color mismatch between restoration and natural teeth is a common complaint resulting in remake of restorations and increased expense.(2) As most dental procedures lead to dehydration of teeth which can alter their shade and may lead to errors in shade matching. And in order to avoid unacceptable mismatch of color between natural teeth and dental restoration, it is important that the shade matching procedure is carried out at the beginning of the appointment. Thus the aim of this study was to investigate any change in tooth color resulting from dehydration resulted from rubber dam application and the time required for any change to return to baseline and to investigate the nature of change and areas of the teeth most affected.

Conditions

Tooth Shade

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: DOUBLE

Study Groups

Dehydration

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Dehydration

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Dehydration of the natural tooth by tooth isolation

Rehydration

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Rehydration

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Rehydration

Interventions

Dehydration

Dehydration of the natural tooth by tooth isolation

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Rehydration

Rehydration

Intervention Type: PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients with unrestored intact maxillary central incisors with no tooth bleaching performed during the previous year.

Exclusion Criteria

• Presence of any restorations or fixed orthodontic appliance or any fixed retainers on central incisors

• Minimum Eligible Age: 20 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 55 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes

Sponsors

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Sameh Abou-steit

Sameh Abou-Steit

Responsibility Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Ahmed El Zohairy, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Head of Operative department

Locations

Faculty of Dentistry, Cairo Univerity

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

Egypt

Central Contacts

Sameh Abou-Steit, PhD

Role: CONTACT

samehabousteit@gmail.com

01001891010

Ahmed El Zohairy, PhD

Role: CONTACT

aelzohairy@gmail.com

01227848002

Facility Contacts

Ahmed El Zohairy, PhD

Role: primary

aelzohairy@gmail.com

01227848002

References

Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Geiger SB, Levin L. Patients' satisfaction with dental esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007 Jun;138(6):805-8. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0269.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17545270 (View on PubMed)

Burki Z, Watkins S, Wilson R, Fenlon M. A randomised controlled trial to investigate the effects of dehydration on tooth colour. J Dent. 2013 Mar;41(3):250-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.11.009. Epub 2012 Nov 14.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23160038 (View on PubMed)

Bazos P, Magne P. Bio-Emulation: biomimetically emulating nature utilizing a histoanatomic approach; visual synthesis. Int J Esthet Dent. 2014 Autumn;9(3):330-52.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 25126615 (View on PubMed)

Hariri I, Sadr A, Nakashima S, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Estimation of the enamel and dentin mineral content from the refractive index. Caries Res. 2013;47(1):18-26. doi: 10.1159/000342416. Epub 2012 Oct 10.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23051596 (View on PubMed)

Hariri I, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Effects of structural orientation of enamel and dentine on light attenuation and local refractive index: an optical coherence tomography study. J Dent. 2012 May;40(5):387-96. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.01.017. Epub 2012 Feb 7.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22342164 (View on PubMed)

Joiner A. Tooth colour: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2004;32 Suppl 1:3-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.10.013.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 14738829 (View on PubMed)

Paul S, Peter A, Pietrobon N, Hammerle CH. Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res. 2002 Aug;81(8):578-82. doi: 10.1177/154405910208100815.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12147751 (View on PubMed)

Brewer JD, Wee A, Seghi R. Advances in color matching. Dent Clin North Am. 2004 Apr;48(2):v, 341-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2004.01.004.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15172604 (View on PubMed)

Douglas RD, Steinhauer TJ, Wee AG. Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Apr;97(4):200-8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2007.02.012.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17499089 (View on PubMed)

Stevenson B. Current methods of shade matching in dentistry: a review of the supporting literature. Dent Update. 2009 Jun;36(5):270-2, 274-6. doi: 10.12968/denu.2009.36.5.270.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19585849 (View on PubMed)

Dozic A, Kleverlaan CJ, El-Zohairy A, Feilzer AJ, Khashayar G. Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices. J Prosthodont. 2007 Mar-Apr;16(2):93-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2007.00163.x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 17362418 (View on PubMed)

Russell MD, Gulfraz M, Moss BW. In vivo measurement of colour changes in natural teeth. J Oral Rehabil. 2000 Sep;27(9):786-92. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00610.x.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 11012854 (View on PubMed)

Meng Z, Yao XS, Yao H, Liang Y, Liu T, Li Y, Wang G, Lan S. Measurement of the refractive index of human teeth by optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2009 May-Jun;14(3):034010. doi: 10.1117/1.3130322.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19566303 (View on PubMed)

Suliman S, Sulaiman TA, Olafsson VG, Delgado AJ, Donovan TE, Heymann HO. Effect of time on tooth dehydration and rehydration. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019 Mar;31(2):118-123. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12461. Epub 2019 Feb 23.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 30801926 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

CEBD-2020-4-040

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id