Tenting Abutment Technique Versus Screw"Tent-Pole" Technique for Augmentation of Posterior Atrophic Mandible

NCT ID: NCT06443476

Last Updated: 2024-06-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-01

Study Completion Date

2024-10-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To evaluate a novel method using a designed tenting abutment to reduce number of surgeries and the edentulous healing period is shortened. In addition, to prevent vertical and horizontal collapse of the bone graft and minimizes resorption of the bone graft during the healing the atrophic posterior mandible.

The tent pole provides excellent mechanical properties; stability \& fixation, yet very poor features to preserve the integrity of the soft tissue.

Using the tenting abutment technique will help preserve the soft tissue and decrease the amount of dehiscence that might accompany the use of the tent pole.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Augmentation of insufficient bone volume can be brought about by different methods, including, particulate and block grafting materials, guided Bone Regeneration with or without growth and differentiation factors, ridge splitting, expansion and distraction osteogenesis, either alone or in combination. These techniques may be used for horizontal/vertical ridge augmentation.

Xenograft bone has been utilized for the reconstruction of large 3-dimensional defects because it has no donor site morbidity and is of an unlimited volume in quantity.

Guided bone regeneration (GBR) describes the use of membranes to regenerate bony defects. A membrane for GBR needs to be biocompatible, cell occlusive, non-toxic, moldable and possess space-maintaining properties including stability.

* e. Explanation for choice of comparators (conventional titanium mesh): Tent pole offers superb mechanical properties for guided bone regeneration treatment in larger areas and it is regarded one of the most available covers for guided bone regeneration yet one of the cheapest.

B. Objectives:
* a. Aim of the study:

* To evaluate the quantity of gained bone under tenting abutment compared to a tent pole.
* To evaluate amount of wound dehiscence postoperatively using tenting abutment technique compared to a tent pole.
* ·To optimize the anatomical situation in order to facilitate implant installation.

7b. Hypothesis:

* Bone is a dynamic and living tissue with the capacity to repair and regenerate in response to injury. It is further possible to guide bone cells into an area that previously consisted of bony tissue to regenerate bone and increase the bone volume.
* Tenting abutment is suitable as a biomaterial for creating a space between the bone cortex and the periosteum to enhance new bone regeneration.
* Tenting abutment material will enhance the quantity and quality of newly formed bone.
* Tenting abutment will cause less soft tissue dehiscence and will dramatically decrease the percentage of the collapse of the space produced by the bone graft and minimizes resorption of the grafting material compared to the titanium mesh.

7c. Primary and secondary objectives:
1. Primary objective:

Evaluate bone gained (height and width) and the period of time of healing in the atrophic posterior mandible when using tenting abutment technique compared to tent pole.
2. Secondary objectives:

Evaluation of soft tissue dehiscence and resorption of the grafting material that might occur using tent pole compared to the tenting abutment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Posterior Atrophic Mandible

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Evaluate bone gained (height and width) and the period of time of healing in the atrophic posterior mandible when using the tenting abutment technique compared to the tent pole
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

conventional group

Using a tent pole to gain bone in the atrophic posterior mandible.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tent pole technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

using the Tent pole technique to gain bone vertical and horizontal loss

study group

Using a Tenting abutment to gain bone in the atrophic posterior mandible

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tenting abutment technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

To evaluate a novel method using a designed tenting abutment to reduce number of surgeries and the edentulous healing period is shortened. In addition, to prevent vertical and horizontal collapse of the bone graft and minimizes resorption of the bone graft during the healing the atrophic posterior mandible.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tenting abutment technique

To evaluate a novel method using a designed tenting abutment to reduce number of surgeries and the edentulous healing period is shortened. In addition, to prevent vertical and horizontal collapse of the bone graft and minimizes resorption of the bone graft during the healing the atrophic posterior mandible.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Tent pole technique

using the Tent pole technique to gain bone vertical and horizontal loss

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with atrophic posterior mandible.
* Both sexes.
* No intraoral soft and hard tissue pathology.
* No systemic condition that contraindicates implant placement

Exclusion Criteria

* Local criteria:

* Untreated gingivitis, periodontitis.
* Insufficient oral hygiene.
* Previous radiation therapy for the head and neck neoplasia, or bone augmentation to implant site..

Systemic criteria:

* Systemic disorders.
* Heavy smoking of more than 20 cigarettes per day.
* Bone pathology.
* ·Psychiatric problems. Emotional instability. Unrealistic aesthetic demands.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Alaa Mohmmed Salem Hafedh

PRINCIPLE INVESTIGATOR

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mohamed ahmed Farid shehab, professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

supervisor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Alaa Mohammed Hafedh

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

alaa Mohammed Hafedh, master

Role: CONTACT

+201008164907

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Alaa Mohammed Hafedh, Master

Role: primary

01008164907

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

OMFS (3-3-5)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Autogenous Tooth Graft for Ridge Augmentation
NCT06416605 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA