Evaluation of the Efficacy of Allograft Versus Tenting Technique in Open Sinus Lifting With Immediate Implant Placement

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-01

Study Completion Date

2024-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Implant placement in deficient posterior maxilla is a challenging clinical situation that necessitates appropriate treatment options to restore this area.

-Aim of the study: To compare allograft vs tenting technique in terms of implant stability and bone height.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Comparative Study Between Autogenous Bone Block and Tent Pole Technique for Augmentation of Atrophic Anterior Maxilla

NCT06125938

Bone Atrophy, Alveolar

RECRUITING NA

Evaluation of Two Different Techniques for Sinus Elevation, Open Versus Closed .

NCT06265467

Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Sinus Floor Augmentation Maxillary Sinus

COMPLETED NA

Posterior Maxillary Ridge Augmentation With Sinus Lift Using Mineralized Plasmatic Matrix Versus Autogenous Bone Graft

NCT03014388

Bone Resorption

UNKNOWN NA

Marginal Bone Changes Around Dental Implant Placed With Open vs. Closed Sinus Elevation

NCT06811337

Marginal Bone Levels Open Sinus Elevation Closed Sinus Elevation

COMPLETED PHASE4

Tenting Abutment Technique Versus Screw"Tent-Pole" Technique for Augmentation of Posterior Atrophic Mandible

NCT06443476

Posterior Atrophic Mandible

UNKNOWN NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale for carrying out the trial:

The research population will be divided into two groups. Group1 will be treated by allograft with immediate implant technique, Group2 will be treated by tenting technique with immediate implant technique. Allograft has been effective in augmenting bone growth and has been proven to be a vital asset in sinus lifting.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sinus; Dental Implant Complication Surgery-Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sinus lifting without graft (control )

Patients will receive sinus lifting with immediate implant placement without graft placement.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Sinus lifting without graft

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants will receive sinus lifting with immediate implant in premolar-molar area without graft

Sinus lifting with graft (intervention)

Patients will receive sinus lifting with immediate implant and allograft placement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Sinus lifting with allograft

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Participants will receive sinus lifting and allograft with immediate implant in premolar-molar area.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Sinus lifting with allograft

Participants will receive sinus lifting and allograft with immediate implant in premolar-molar area.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Sinus lifting without graft

Participants will receive sinus lifting with immediate implant in premolar-molar area without graft

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Tenting technique

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patient with missing upper pre molar , molar teeth
2. Patients in need of bone grafting of the maxillary sinus to house an implant.
3. Patients with residual alveolar crest of at least 3-4mm in height and 5mm in width distal to the canine as measured on CBCT scan
4. Patients with adequate inter-arch space

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients suffering from any sinus pathosis.
2. Patients who are heavy smokers (\>10 cigarettes/day).
3. Patient under psychiatric therapy or unrealistic expectations
4. Patients of systemic conditions that may interfere with carrying out the surgical procedure.
5. Lack of opposite occluding dentition/prosthesis in the area intended for implant placement
6. Severe bruxism or clenching
7. Poor oral hygiene (full mouth bleeding on probing and full mouth plaque index \>25%)

Minimum Eligible Age

30 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes