Radiographic and Histological Assessment of Autogenous Onlay Block Versus Cortical Shell on Anterior Maxilla

NCT ID: NCT06450535

Last Updated: 2024-06-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

16 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Two groups of patient with horizontally deficient anterior maxilla indicated for bone augmentation ,one will be subjected to autogenous onlay bone block from retromolar bone and the other to cortical shell from retromolar bone also.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

* Two groups of patients with horizontally deficient anterior maxilla indicated for bone augmentation, the first group will be subjected to autogenous onlay bone block from retromolar bone and the other group to cortical shell from retromolar bone also.
* periodontal therapy will be performed before any procedure and oral hygiene measures will be given to the patient.
* After injecting local anesthesia in the anterior maxillary region a trapezoidal flap will be performed in the area of horizontal bone defect (the recipient site).
* The recipient site will be decorticated and recontoured using a round bone bur for better adaptation of the graft and to improve graft-to-recipient bone contact.
* Bone harvesting will be carried out from retromolar region (the donor site) a crestal incision will be carried out 5 mm below and parallel to the gingival margin of the mandibular molars.
* subperiosteal dissection will be extended to expose the ascending ramus and the retromolar region.
* Using piezoelectric device a crestal cut and two proximal vertical cuts penetrating the cortex of the external oblique ridge will be performed then the inferior cut will be carried out.
* Using a mallet and chisel the bone block will be sheared off.
* The underlying cancellous bone will be gently retrieved and the collected bone will be conserved in sterile saline, followed by suturing the mucosal wound.
* Onlay bone block graft procedure (control group)
* In the first intervention, a bone block harvested from the donor site will be fixed with osteosynthesis titanium screws to the recipient site as an onlay graft to achieve a horizontal enlargement of the alveolar ridge.
* Cortical shell graft procedure (intervention group)
* The harvested cortical plate will be split longitudinally in two parts using a micro-saw and thinned with the bone scraper to achieve a plate of 1 mm thickness.
* The plate will be fixed at a distance from the residual ridge with 2 screws.
* Autogenous bone particles, collected with the bone scraper, were tightly packed into the gap between the plate and the recipient site.
* Radiographic assessment will be achieved by CBCT scan immediately and 4 months postoperatively to evaluate bone regeneration and final horizontal bone width.
* In the two groups, the screws will be removed 4 months postoperatively after final CBCT.
* The bone formed in the gap between the bone segment and the original bone will be measured from the CBCT scan.
* Before the intraoperative installment of the dental implants, bone core biopsies will be retrieved from each patient's recipient sites followed by implant placement.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Alveolar Bone Loss

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomzed cinical trial

A trial will be caried out in hosptal of Oral and Maxllolacial surgery department- Faculy of Oral and Dental Medicine Cairo Univerity.

Equal randomizaion: participants wih equal probabilites for intervenion

Postive controlled :Both groups receiving treatment

Parallel group study: Each group of patients receives a single treatment simutaneously
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
This trial is considered a randomized single blind clinical trial due to the following:

* The participants will be blinded to the technique that will be used during the surgical procedure.
* The operator will not be blinded for both techniques during the surgical procedure as the two techniques are different.
* The outcome assessor cannot be blinded. C) Data collection, management, and analysis:

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Autogenous onlay block from retromolar bone

In the first intervention, a bone block harvested from the donor site was fixed with osteosynthesis titanium screws to the recipient site as an onlay graft to achieve a horizontal enlargement of the alveolar ridge.

● Placement of the bone graft was always guided by an augmentation template

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Autogenous onlay bone block harvesting from retromolar bone in anterior maxilla

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Surgical protocol ( retromolar bone harvesting) After injecting local anesthesia a crestal incision is done, from a point on the occlusal surface along the external oblique ridge and extending anteriorly and inferiorly through the buccal mucosa, parallel to the gingival margin of the mandibular molars.

The subperiosteal dissection extend to expose the ascending ramus and the retromolar region With the aid of surgical carbide burs, two proximal vertical cuts penetrating the cortex of the external oblique ridge.

The depth of penetration of the posterior cut did not exceed 2.5 mm to avoid injury to the inferior alveolar nerve.

By using microsaw , an inferior cut of 3.2 mm in depth joining the anterior and posterior vertical cuts was done.

Small perforations of 3-4 mm in depth were performed on the superior aspect of the external oblique ridge using 1 mm drill bur.

Finally, the block was sheared off using a chisel.

Cortical shell technique from retromolar bone

The harvested cortical plate was then split longitudinally in two parts using a microsaw, and thinned with the bone scraper to achieve a plate of 1 mm thickness.

* The plate was fixed at a distance from the residual ridge with 2 screws.
* Autogenous bone particles, collected with the bone scraper, were tightly packed into the gap between the plate and the recipient site.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Autogenous cortical shell technique from retromolar bone in anterior maxilla

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The harvested cortical plate was then split longitudinally in two parts using a microsaw, and thinned with the bone scraper to achieve a plate of 1 mm thickness.

The plate was fixed at a distance from the residual ridge with 2 screws. Autogenous bone particles, collected with the bone scraper, were tightly packed into the gap between the plate and the recipient site.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Autogenous onlay bone block harvesting from retromolar bone in anterior maxilla

Surgical protocol ( retromolar bone harvesting) After injecting local anesthesia a crestal incision is done, from a point on the occlusal surface along the external oblique ridge and extending anteriorly and inferiorly through the buccal mucosa, parallel to the gingival margin of the mandibular molars.

The subperiosteal dissection extend to expose the ascending ramus and the retromolar region With the aid of surgical carbide burs, two proximal vertical cuts penetrating the cortex of the external oblique ridge.

The depth of penetration of the posterior cut did not exceed 2.5 mm to avoid injury to the inferior alveolar nerve.

By using microsaw , an inferior cut of 3.2 mm in depth joining the anterior and posterior vertical cuts was done.

Small perforations of 3-4 mm in depth were performed on the superior aspect of the external oblique ridge using 1 mm drill bur.

Finally, the block was sheared off using a chisel.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Autogenous cortical shell technique from retromolar bone in anterior maxilla

The harvested cortical plate was then split longitudinally in two parts using a microsaw, and thinned with the bone scraper to achieve a plate of 1 mm thickness.

The plate was fixed at a distance from the residual ridge with 2 screws. Autogenous bone particles, collected with the bone scraper, were tightly packed into the gap between the plate and the recipient site.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Autogenous onlay block from retomolar bone Cortical shell technique from retromolar bone

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients in both sex with partial edentulism of the maxilla and requiring horizontal ridge augmentation
* The ages of the patients ranged from 20 to 60 years.
* The residual ridge width in these patients are less than 4.m
* Sufficient bone in intra-oral donor sites are available (external oblique ridge)
* Patients free from any systemic conditions and bone metabolism diseases that might interfere with the surgical intervention, soft tissue or hard tissue healing.
* The vertical level should be in a favourable esthetic appearance with normal inter-arch space
* The minimum number of missing teeth in the anterior maxilla alveolar ridge is one single extracted teeth

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area less than 1 year before implantation.
* Poor oral hygiene and motivation.
* Uncontrolled diabetes.
* Pregnant or nursing.
* Substance abuse.
* Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations.
* Severe bruxism or clenching.
* Immunosuppressed or immunocompromised.
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Maria Ibrahim Nageeb

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

mohamed atef, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

faculty of oral and dental medicine,cairo university

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

faculty of oral and dental medicine ,Cairo university

Cairo, Giza Governorate, Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

maria ibrahim nageeb, BSc

Role: CONTACT

01002402712

maria ibrahim nageeb, BSc

Role: CONTACT

01002402712

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

MARIA ibrahim nageeb, BSc

Role: primary

01002402712

mohamed atef, PhD

Role: backup

01009612708

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18585604/

Breakage of internal maxillary distractor: considerable complication of maxillary distraction osteogenesis

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4393991/

The outcome of intraoral onlay block bone grafts on alveolar ridge augmentations: A systematic review

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27476677/

Lateral Ridge Augmentation Using Autogenous Block Grafts and Guided Bone Regeneration: A 10-Year Prospective Case Series Study

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28095518/

Long-Term Results of Peri-implant Conditions in Periodontally Compromised Patients Following Lateral Bone Augmentation.

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10453672/

Augmentation of the sinus floor with mandibular bone block and simultaneous implantation: a 6-year clinical investigation

http://www.stoma.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Fachbeitraege/JOS_microscrew_Khoury_Hidajat.pdf

"Secure and effective stabilization of different sized autogenous bone grafts."

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24894890/

Mechanisms of guided bone regeneration: a review

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25654055/

Evolution of Barrier Membranes in Periodontal Regeneration-"Are the third Generation Membranes really here?

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34224171/

Treatment concepts of horizontally deficient ridges-A retrospective study comparing narrow-diameter implants in pristine bone with standard-diameter implants in augmented bone.

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12956475/

Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study.

http://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7751111/

The edentulous ridge expansion technique: a five-year study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBD_CU_2024_26_1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.